|
|
|
|
Vol. 59, Issue 2, 331-338, February 2001
2-AR Subtypes
Specific Regulation of cAMP Accumulation in Adenylyl Cyclase II
Transfected DDT1-MF2 Cells
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Reproduction, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ESA 7080, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France (I.L.-B., R.B.-A., J.-P.M., C.L.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (T.W.G.) and Department of Pharmacology (S.M.L.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-Adrenergic receptor (
2-AR) activation in the
pregnant rat myometrium at midterm potentiates
2-AR
stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) via G
regulation of the type
II isoform of adenylyl cyclase. However, at term,
2-AR
activation inhibits
2-AR stimulation of AC. This
phenomenon is associated with changes in
2-AR subtype expression (midterm
2A/D-AR
2B-AR;
term
2B
2A/D-AR), without any
change in ACII mRNA, suggesting that
2A/D- and
2B-AR differentially regulate
2-cAMP
production. To address this issue, we have stably expressed the same
density of
2A/D- or
2B-AR with AC II in
DDT1-MF2 cells. Clonidine (partial agonist) increased
2-AR-stimulated cAMP production in
2A/D-AR-ACII transfectants but inhibited it in
2B-AR-ACII transfectants. In contrast, epinephrine (full
agonist) enhanced
2-stimulated ACII in both
2A- and
2B-ACII clonal cell lines.
4-Azidoanilido-[
-32P]GTP-labeling of activated G
proteins indicated that, in
2B-AR transfectants,
clonidine activated only Gi2, whereas epinephrine, the full
agonist, effectively coupled to Gi2 and Gi3.
Thus, partial and full agonists selectively activate G proteins that
lead to drug specific effects on effectors. Moreover, these data
indicate that Gi3 activation is required for potentiation
of
2-AR stimulation of AC by
2A/D and
2B-AR in DDT1-MF2 cells. This may reflect an issue of
the amount of G
released upon receptor activation and/or 
composition of Gi3 versus Gi2.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In
pregnant rat myometrium,
2-adrenoceptor (AR)
signaling pathways differentially modulate
2-AR-mediated regulation of adenylyl cyclase
(AC) at midpregnancy and at term (Mhaouty et al., 1995
). At midterm,
2-AR activation potentiates adenylyl cyclase
activity stimulated by
2-AR, thus enhancing
uterine relaxation in response to catecholamines. This augmentation of
AC activity induced by
2-AR probably involves
the type II family isoform of AC and is caused by the input of G
released from Gi (Gi2 and/or
Gi3) that synergizes with Gs to further elevate
cAMP levels (Mhaouty-Kodja et al., 1997
). In contrast, at term,
myometrial
2-AR/Gi signaling pathways reduce
the
2-AR-induced-cAMP generation to allow
intracellular Ca2+ increase and cell contraction.
This switch in the stimulatory versus inhibitory input to
2-AR-dependent cAMP generation that occurs
between mid- and late pregnancy may be influenced by changes in the
expression of AC isoforms, G proteins, and/or
2-AR subtypes expression.
When comparing mid- and late pregnancy, no substantial modification in
the amounts of specific types of AC transcripts and no alteration in
the basal activity of the AC system (Mhaouty-Kodja et al., 1997
) could
be found. In particular, the expression of transcripts encoding for
members of AC type II family, which are involved in this potentiation
process, persisted throughout the time course of pregnancy up to
parturition (Mhaouty-Kodja et al., 1997
). Conversely, as shown by
pharmacological data (Bouet-Alard et al., 1997
) and Northern blot
analysis (Mhaouty et al., 1995
), the two
2-AR
subtypes expressed in rat myometrium,
2A- and
2B-AR, were differentially expressed at
midpregnancy and term (midpregnancy
2A/D-AR
2B-AR; term
2B
2A/D-AR). Also, significant changes in the
Gi2/Gi3 ratio could be
detected by immunoblot analysis (Tanfin et al., 1991
; Cohen-Tannoudji
et al., 1995
). Altogether, these data suggested that the switch of
regulation mediated by
2-adrenoceptors toward
2-dependent cAMP production could result from
a specific signaling of
2-AR subtypes toward
AC II activity and/or alteration in receptor coupling to G proteins.
As an initial approach, we used DDT1-MF2 (hamster vas deferens smooth
muscle cell) cotransfectants stably expressing
2A/D-AR (RG20) or
2B-AR (
2C2) and AC
type II isoform and studied the regulation induced by each
2-AR subtypes on
2-stimulated AC II activity.
We report, herein, agonist and receptor specific regulation of ACII
that involves selective coupling to Gi2 versus
Gi3. Our results also shed light upon molecular
mechanism by which clonidine acts as a partial agonist through
2B-AR.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[3H]cAMP (30 Ci/mmol),
[32P]ATP (30 Ci/mmol),
[3H]rauwolscine (81 Ci/mmol),
[
-32P]GTP (3000 Ci/mmol), and
[125I]cAMP radioimmunoassay kit were purchased
from NEN Life Sciences Products (Les Ulis, France). ARC-239 bichloride
(2[2-[4(O-methoxy-phen) piperazine-1-y]4,4dimethyl-1,3,2H-4H]
isoquinolinedione) was a gift from Karl Thomae (Biberach, Germany).
4-Azidoanilide was obtained from Fluka Biochemicals (Saint Quentin
Fallavier, France). 1-Ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl] carbodiimide
HCl and Dowex 50W-X4 (100-200 mesh, hydrogen form) were from Bio-Rad
(Ivry sur Seine, France). PEI-cellulose plates and aluminum
oxide (90 active neutral) were purchased from Merck (Nogent sur
Marne, France). Cell culture supplies were obtained from Life
Technologies (Cergy-Pontoise, France). Pansorbin cells were supplied
from Calbiochem (Meudon, France). GF/C glass-fiber filters were from
Millipore (Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France). All remaining drugs were
from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Quentin Fallavier, France).
Cell Culture and Transfection.
DDT1-MF2 cells were grown and
stably transfected with human
2B
(
2C2) or rat
2A/D
(RG20) cDNA as described previously (Duzic and Lanier, 1992
). Resistant
clones were tested for their
2-AR binding
capacity using the selective tritiated antagonist
[3H]rauwolscine as described under binding
studies. Clones expressing a receptor density between 1 and 1.5 pmol/mg
of membrane proteins, were further cotransfected with the ACII cDNA
expression vector and the drug resistance cassette pHyg according to
the transfection strategy described by Gorman (1986)
. Transfected cells
were selected by their resistance to hygromycin B (750 mg/ml). Each
clone was then analyzed for AC II expression by Northern blot using a
32P-labeled cDNA AC II probe [rat full-length (4 kilobases)] as described previously (Marjamaki et al., 1997
) and
tested for enzyme activity.
Partially Purified Membrane Preparation.
Membranes were
prepared by hypotonic lysis in ice-cold lysis buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mg/ml pepstatin A) and collected by
centrifugation (17,000g for 15 min at 4°C). Membrane
pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, for adenylyl cyclase
assay or 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM
EDTA for binding studies. Protein concentration was determined
according to the method of Schacterle and Pollack (1973)
using bovine
serum albumin as standard.
Binding Studies.
For saturation experiments, membranes
(30-40 µg) were incubated with the required concentrations of
[3H]rauwolscine [1-50 nM] for 20 min at
25°C in a final volume of 100 µl. Nonspecific binding was
determined in the presence of 10 µM phentolamine. Competition studies
were performed in presence of increasing concentrations (10 pM-50
µM) of various competitors and 8 nM
[3H]rauwolscine (a concentration near the
KD value). Bound radioligand was separated
from the free by vacuum filtration over GF/C glass-fiber filters as
described previously (Bouet-Alard et al., 1997
). Radioactivity was
counted by liquid scintillation in a 1214 Rack-
spectrometer (LKB,
Rockville, MD) with a counting efficiency of approximately 30%.
Adenylyl Cyclase Assay and Determination of Intracellular cAMP
Accumulation.
Adenylyl cyclase activity was measured as described
previously (E. Duzic and S.M. Lanier, 1992
) using 50 µg of crude
membrane. For intracellular cAMP accumulation, cells were plated at a
concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well in
six-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. One hour before
starting the experiment, the medium was removed and replaced with 4 ml
of serum-free DMEM containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 250 mM
isobutyl-L-methylxanthine. Then, cells were incubated with
drugs to be tested for 10 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by
aspiration of the medium and cells were disrupted by the addition of 1 ml of 10% ice-cold trichloracetic acid per well. After recovering the
cellular lysate by scrapping the wells, samples were centrifuged
(10,000g, 15 min at 4°C). The supernatants were then
extracted 3 times with diethyl ether (1v/4v) and cAMP contents
were determined by a cAMP radioimmunoassay system obtained from NEN
Life Sciences Products.
Immunoblot and Immunoprecipitation.
For immunoblotting, 50 µg of membranes obtained from DDT1-MF2 cells or tissues were resolved
on 10% SDS-PAGE and transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride-transfer
membrane POLYSCREEN (NEN Research Products, DuPont de Nemours, France).
After transfer, the blots were probed with anti-G
protein subtype
specific antibodies as described previously (Cohen-Tannoudji et al.,
1995
). Briefly, after blocking, the polyvinylidene difluoride blots
were incubated with the primary antibody [AS/7
(anti-Gi
2/Gi
1) or
EC/2 (anti-Gi
3/G
o) or GC/2
(anti-G
o)] for 1 h in a high-detergent 5% nonfat dry milk/Tris-buffered saline at room temperature at a dilution of 1:1000. After four successive washes, the blots were incubated for
1 h with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody in high-detergent 5%
nonfat dry milk/Tris-buffered saline. After washing, bound antibodies
were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, les Ulis, France). For immunoprecipitation, antisera
were raised against the C-terminal decapeptide (amino acids 345-354)
of Gi
3 and against the C-terminal decapeptide (amino acids 345-354) that is shared by both
Gi
1 and Gi
2 as described previously (Gettys et al., 1994
). The antisera were characterized with respect to titer, specificity, and cross-reactivity using lysates from bacteria transformed with cDNA for each of the G
proteins. Each antiserum was desalted and purified as described previously (Raymond et al., 1993
; Gettys et al., 1994
).
Photolabeling of Membrane G Proteins.
The
4-azidoanilido-[
-32P]GTP
([
-32P]AA-GTP) was synthesized according to
the method described by Offermanns et al., 1990
and 1991
), except that
[
-32P]AA-GTP was purified using a thin-layer
chromatography and finally resuspended in water at a concentration of
4 × 109 cpm/ml. Photoaffinity labeling of G
proteins was performed as described by Offermanns et al. (1991)
.
Briefly, cell membranes (50 µg) were preincubated with
2-AR agonists and/or antagonists for 10 min at
30°C in 50 µl of assay buffer containing 30 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 1 mM benzamidine, 5 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM leupeptin, and 3 µM GDP. Then, 10 µl of [
-32P]AA-GTP (0.4 × 109 cpm/ml) diluted in distilled water was added
to each sample and the labeling reaction was allowed to proceed for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 100 µl of ice-cold
assay buffer and immediate 4°C centrifugation at 12,000g
for 10 min. All subsequent procedures were performed at 4°C.
Supernatants containing free [
-32P]AA-GTP
were removed. Membrane pellets were rapidly resuspended in 55 µl of
assay buffer supplemented with 2 mM dithiothreitol and exposed, on ice,
to UV light (254 nm, 15 W) in the dark for 4 min. Before
immunoprecipitation, photolabeled membranes (50 µl) were then
solubilized by incubation in presence of 0.25% SDS at 60°C for 5 min
and addition of 50 µl of an immunoprecipitation buffer (0.5% SDS,
2% Nonidet P40, 1% cholate, 150 mM NaCl). Solubilized samples were
first incubated 30 min at 4°C with prewashed Pansorbin cells (25 µl
of a 10% solution in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) to further
minimize the nonspecific antibody binding. After removing Pansorbin
cells by centrifugation (700 g), each sample was divided in
two aliquots and incubated in presence of
anti-Gi
2 or -Gi
3 IgG
(1:50) over night at 4°C under constant rotation. The immunocomplexes were collected by the addition of 25 µl of Pansorbin cell suspension and centrifugation at 700g. Then, pellets were washed two
times in PBS and resuspended in 30 µl of 1.5% SDS and 30 µl of
Laemmli buffer (Laemmli, 1970
). Samples were boiled for 5 min before
10% SDS-PAGE analysis. After drying the gel, photolabeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography on Kodak X-Omat AR-5 films (Sigma-Aldrich). Incorporation of
[
-32P]AA-GTP into immunoprecipitated G
proteins
subunits was quantified by densitometric analysis of
autoradiograms with an Imstar computer-assisted image analyzer. Results
are expressed as -fold incorporation of [
-32P]AA-GTP into immunoprecipitated G
protein
subunits compared with unstimulated control subunits.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Establishment of the Experimental System.
DDT1-MF2 cells
express useful common and distinct signaling entities in comparison
with pregnant myometrium. Indeed, they display a similar density of
2 adrenoceptors and Gs proteins (Hadcock et
al., 1991
; Vivat et al., 1992
). They also express the same isoforms of
pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G proteins (Gi2
and Gi3) that exert a similar tonic inhibition of
adenylyl cyclase activity in an agonist-independent manner (Tanfin et
al., 1991
; Cohen-Tannoudji et al., 1995
). However, none of
2-AR subtypes (Philippe et al., 1989
; Duzic
and Lanier, 1992
) nor AC isoforms type II and IV could be detected
(Marjamaki et al., 1997
). Thus we established, in this cell line, an
experimental system expressing
2A/D- or
2B-AR subtype in presence of AC II using
stable gene transfection method to further assess their functional characterization.
2B-AR or the rat
2A/D-AR. After Scatchard analysis of
saturation binding studies using
[3H]rauwolscine, cell lines expressing ~ 1.5 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane proteins were isolated. No specific
binding of [3H]rauwolscine was seen in control
DDT1-MF2 cell membranes. As shown Fig.
1A, competition studies revealed that
[3H]rauwolscine-specific binding was inhibited
by subtype-selective compounds such as oxymetazoline
(
2A-specific), chlorpromazine and ARC 239 (
2B- specific) with
pKi values characteristic of human
2B-AR (Bylund et al., 1988
2B-AR receptors displayed
the expected ligand recognition properties. The
2-AR selective agonist clonidine inhibited the
2-AR-stimulated-cAMP production in a
dose-dependent manner (significant at concentrations as low as 1 nM, *p < 0.05) (Fig. 1B). This inhibitory
effect was mediated through
2B-AR, because it
was prevented by the
2-AR antagonist yohimbine
and was not observed in cells transfected with vector alone. Incubation
of the cells with PTX completely abolished the inhibition of stimulated
cAMP accumulation elicited by the activation of the expressed
2B-AR (data not shown). Maximal
reduction of the isoproterenol response was 59% ± 6 (EC50 value of ~ 30 nM). These additional
data indicated that, besides retaining its binding features,
2B-AR expressed in the plasma membranes of
DDT1-MF2 cells was functional and implicated in a negative cross talk
with the
2-AR/Gs cascade through PTX-sensitive G proteins.
|
2B-AR and
2A/D-AR were further stably cotransfected with
the cDNA encoding adenylyl cyclase II isoform. RNA screening using AC
II cDNA-specific probe indicated that transcripts of expected
4.2-kilobase size were detected in selected hygromycin resistant clones
but not in control cells transfected with vector alone (data not
shown). These clonal cell lines coexpressing the
2B-AR and adenylyl cyclase II were also assessed for functional evaluation of enzyme activity in response to a
saturating dose (10 µM) of GTP
S in comparison with DDT1-MF2 cells
expressing
2B-AR only. With regard to
DDT1-MF2-
2B and -
2A/D
transfectants, stimulation with GTP
S increased adenylyl cyclase
activity by ~6 fold in both DDT1-MF2-
2B-ACII
and -
2A/D-ACII cotransfectants [from 650 ± 27 to 3650 ± 460 and 570 ± 70 to 4100 ± 330 pmol
cAMP/10 min/mg of protein, respectively (Fig.
2)]. Similar observations have been made
in previous experiments in DDT1-MF2 cells stably transfected with
adenylyl cyclase II cDNA alone (Marjamaki et al., 1997
2B-ACII or
-
2A/D-ACII cotransfectants encoded for an
enzyme exhibiting the expected functional properties.
|
Effect of
2-AR Activation on Cellular cAMP in DDT1-MF2
Cotransfectants.
Whereas epinephrine stimulation potentiated the
2-activated cAMP production in
DDT1-MF2-
2B-ACII cotransfectants, clonidine decreased it (Fig. 3A). Indeed,
epinephine enhanced
2-stimulated cAMP
production up to 52% ± 2 at 10 µM with an
ED50 value of 114 ± 33 nM. Conversely,
clonidine produced a dose-dependent attenuation of cAMP accumulation
over a concentration range of 1 nM to 0.1 mM. Maximal inhibition
(
43%) was obtained at 1 µM (*p < 0.05). Half-maximal inhibition (ED50) occurred at 10 nM
clonidine. With higher concentrations of clonidine, negative input
persisted, although it was reduced. The inhibitory influence of the
clonidine-activated
2B-AR did not seem to be
caused by low receptor expression in
2B-ACII
cells. Indeed, in these cells, Bmax was
1.3 ± 1 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane protein, a receptor
density equivalent to the one measured in
2A/D-ACII cells (1.2 ± 0.045 pmol/mg). Furthermore, we tested six
2B-ACII clones
ranging in receptor density from 1 to 3 pmol/mg of protein; none
produced significant potentiation of isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP
accumulation using clonidine (data not shown). Conversely, they all
reduced cAMP-
2-AR dependent generation. These
data demonstrated that in
DDT1-MF2 cells expressing
type II AC isoform, the
2B-AR could translate into opposite response depending on the type of agonist used
(epinephrine or clonidine).
|
2B-AC II cotransfectants, both clonidine and
epinephrine increased isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production in
2A/D-AC II cotransfectants (Fig. 3B). The
maximal stimulation of cAMP accumulation was produced at 0.1 µM
clonidine (60 ± 1%) and 1 µM epinephrine (115 ± 41%). ED50 values were 9 ± 1.3 and 180 nM ± 48 nM, respectively.
In both cotransfectants (
2B-ACII and
2A/D-ACII), clonidine as well as epinephrine
effects were blocked by yohimbine (Fig. 3, A and B) and prior treatment
of cells with PTX (Fig. 4). These data
were consistent with the fact that these two agonists potentiated or
inhibited cAMP production acting on
2-ARs
through Gi/o family members endogenously expressed in DDT1-MF2.
However, epinephrine also produced a small PTX-insensitive potentiation
of cAMP levels when acting through
2B-AR. One
possible interpretation of this result is that
2B-AR, when present in high density in the
membrane, may also cross-react, to a low extent, with endogenous Gs
proteins, as reported previously in other cell lines (Eason et al.,
1992
|
2B-AR was able to mediate
opposite regulatory effects (positive input versus negative input) on
Gs-stimulated cAMP production via PTX-sensitive G proteins. To gain
insight on how
2B-AR could switch from a
positive to a negative regulation, we compared Gi protein coupling of
epinephrine- and clonidine-activated
2-AR subtypes.
Selective Recruitment of Gi Proteins by
2B- or
2A/D -AR in Response to Clonidine or Epinephrine.
Within the family of PTX-sensitive G proteins,
DDT1-MF2 cells and
myometrium express Gi2 and
Gi3 (Fig. 5)
(Hadcock et al., 1991
; Tanfin et al., 1991
, Cohen-Tannoudji et al.,
1995
). Thus, agonist-specific adenylyl cyclase II response could be the
consequence of a differential
2-AR subtype
specific recruitment of Gi2 and/or Gi3. So, we questioned whether the differences
observed in the receptor coupling to AC for clonidine and epinephrine
in the cell models reflected specific coupling to
Gi2 or Gi3. This issue was addressed by incubation of membranes with the photoreactive GTP analog,
4-azido-anilido-[
32P]GTP
([
-32P]AA-GTP) in the presence of ligand,
followed by cross-linking, solubilization, and selective
immunoprecipitation of Gi2 or
Gi3.
|
2 protein
exclusively. No significant incorporation of
[
-32P]AA-GTP was detected in
Gi
3 protein. At 1 µM clonidine, maximal labeling of G
i2 with
[
-P32]
AA-GTP (~ 2.5-fold compared with
control fraction) was completely inhibited with yohimbine, thus
indicating that recruitment of Gi
2 protein was
strictly dependent upon
2B-AR activation. It should be noted that 1 µM clonidine elicited maximal inhibition of
Gs-stimulated cAMP production (Fig. 3A). In marked contrast, when experiments of similar design were conducted with epinephrine, both G
i proteins (Gi
2 and
Gi
3) were photolabeled (Fig. 6B). Maximal
incorporation of [
-32P]AA-GTP was obtained
at 1 µM epinephrine for each endogenous Gi protein (~2.6-fold
compared with control fraction). This epinephrine-dependent [
-32P]GTP azidoanilide labeling resulted
from
2B-AR activation, because it could be
completely blocked by yohimbine. On membranes obtained from
DDT1-MF2-
2A/D-ACII cotransfectants where AC II
potentiation also occurred, clonidine induced activation of both types
of Gi proteins [~2.6- and 2-fold, respectively, for
G
i2 and G
i3 proteins compared with unstimulated fraction at 1 µM (Fig.
7)].
|
|
2-AR stimulation of AC II by
2A/D- or
2B-AR in
DDT1-MF2 cells. Furthermore, they suggested that heterotrimeric Gi2 and
Gi3 proteins may have specific roles in modulating stimulated AC II
activity in a given cell type.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of
2-AR subtypes induces
multiple cellular effects, including inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or,
in some physiological models or cell systems, an increase of cAMP
levels. The mechanisms responsible for inhibitory or stimulatory input
on adenylyl cyclase activity/cAMP production greatly depend on their
interaction with PTX-sensitive G inhibitory proteins and, additionally,
also reflect the type of adenylyl cyclases expressed in various cells.
The present work was motivated by the observation that, in the
midpregnancy and term myometrium, the cross talk between activated
2- and
2-ARs
differently affect the degree of intracellular cAMP generation (Mhaouty
et al., 1995
) and, consequently, the relaxed or contractile state of
the uterus (Do Khac et al., 1986
). Molecular events that underlie
these subtle changes in sensitivity of the smooth muscle to
catecholamines may result from 1) the alteration of the
2A/D-/
2B-subtypes
expression pattern (Bouet-Alard et al., 1997
); 2) the drastic changes
of Gi2/Gi3 protein ratio (Tanfin et al., 1991
; Cohen-Tannoudji et al., 1995
); and/or 3) the
functional properties of the pregnant myometrium adenylyl cyclase
population (Mhaouty-Kodja et al., 1997
; Suzuki et al., 1997
). As an
initial approach, we investigated whether
2A/D- and
2B-AR
subtypes could exert different regulatory roles on
2-AR catalyzed cAMP production. To address
this issue, DDT1-MF2 cells provided an interesting context, because
they endogenously express some of the molecular entities
(
2-AR, Gi2,
Gi3, and Gs proteins)
involved in myometrium
2-/
2-AR cross talk
but lack
2-AR subtypes and AC type II isoform.
Thus, we separately expressed
2B- or
2A/D-AR subtype in this cell line and, further
on, cotransfected each clone with the adenylyl cyclase II isoform that
potentiated cAMP production in response to
2-AR agonists in pregnant myometrium. Selected
clonal cell lines with comparable functional pools of ARs and adenylyl
cyclase have provided useful test models for a careful examination on
how
2-AR differ in their ability to modulate
adenylyl cyclase and to couple to endogenous Gi protein.
In this context, we found that, without any ACII expression, clonidine
induced an inhibition of
2-dependent cAMP
production in both
2A- and
2B-AR transfectants (at 1 µM clonidine
2A/D- and
2B-AR
transfectants: 34 ± 3% for and 62 ± 2% rspectively). This
result is consistent with those reported by Duzic and Lanier (1992)
in
the same cell line, demonstrating that
2B- and
2A/D-AR activation similarly inhibits
forskolin-induced increase in intracellular cAMP. When AC II was
coexpressed in DDT1-MF2-
2A/D transfectants, epinephrine as well as clonidine were able to switch the inhibitory signal into a stimulatory input through PTX-sensitive G proteins. In
DDT1-MF2-
2B-AC II cotransfectants, despite a
similar functional pool of AC II and an equivalent density of receptor,
clonidine was unable to trigger such a switch, in contrast with
epinephrine. Direct measurement of G protein activation by
photoaffinity labeling with [
-32P]AA-GTP
followed by selective separation of individual G protein
subunits
revealed that clonidine, acting on
2B-AR,
mediated an exclusive coupling to Gi2, whereas
the full agonist, epinephrine, led to the recruitment of both
PTX-sensitive G proteins, Gi2 and Gi3. Thus, using this photoaffinity probe, it
seems clear that, in DDT1-MF2 cells overexpressing AC II, the ability
of
2B-AR to switch from a negative to a
positive input to Gs-stimulated cAMP production greatly depends on the
recruitment of Gi3.
Previous works have established that the potentiation of Gs-stimulated
cAMP production is caused by the input of G
released from Gi to
AC II that synergizes with Gs to further elevate cAMP levels (Tang and
Gilman, 1991
; Federman et al., 1992
). Nevertheless, this phenomenon can
only occur from a threshold concentration of released Gi
(Tang
and Gilman, 1991
). Thus, the persistent inhibitory effect observed when
Gi2 is activated alone could be explained by the
following hypothesis: the total amount of
Gi2
released upon receptor activation would
be insufficient to overcome inhibitory influences exerted by
Gi
2 on endogenous AC. On the contrary, when
both Gi proteins (Gi2 and
Gi3) were recruited, the threshold concentration
would be reached, thus allowing AC II potentiation. Here, we should
note that the possibility of overcoming G
i2
inhibition was probably reinforced by the low ability of
Gi
3 to induce AC inhibition (Raymond et al.,
1993
; Gettys et al., 1994
). This might also reflect the fact that
Gi2
dimers released upon
2B-AR activation poorly interact or activate AC II compared with Gi3 
. Although there is
no direct evidence that Gi2
and
Gi3
differ in their capacity to potentiate
Gs-stimulated AC, such a hypothesis must be taken into account. Indeed,
several studies report that the regulation of 
-sensitive
effectors depends on the composition of the G
dimers with which
they are interacting (Müller et al., 1997
; Bayewitch et al.,
1998
; Maier et al., 2000
). Finally, because post-translational
modifications are considered important criteria in determining the
potency by which G
complexes modulate effectors (Ford et al.,
1998
), differential modifications of Gi2
and/or -
versus Gi3
and/or -
might also
contribute to the clonidine-specific effect.
The present work also brings some evidence as to whether changes in the
ratio of Gi2 to Gi3
proteins in late pregnant myometrium may play a crucial role for the
switch in the stimulatory versus inhibitory input to AC population from
the
2-AR/Gi protein signaling. The
down-regulation of Gi3 protein, together with
Gi2-increased expression (Cohen-Tannoudji et al.,
1995
), could prevent ACII potentiation, thus allowing the decrease of
2-AR stimulated cAMP production at term. The
inhibition of the synthesis of smooth muscle relaxation factor (cAMP)
together with the increase of intracellular Ca2+
would promote myometrial contractions at term.
In summary, these data provide the molecular basis of clonidine partial
agonist effect when acting through
2B-AR,
because they reveal that this compound selectively uncouples the
receptor from one of the normally targeted G proteins:
Gi3. From this finding, it can be predicted that,
in the situation where clonidine behaves as the full agonist, the
second messenger pathway would be exclusively regulated by
Gi2 in
Gi2/Gi3 expressing cells.
On the other hand, in systems in which clonidine acts as partial
agonist or even as an antagonist, Gi3 would play
a determinant or exclusive role. Furthermore, they suggested that
Gi2 and Gi3 have specific
roles in modulating AC II effector through
and/or 
subunits.
Finally, they shed light upon a possible molecular mechanism that might allow the versatility of signal routed through myometrial
2-AR during pregnancy involved changes in
Gi2/Gi3 ratio.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. S. Mhaouty-Kodja for helpful discussion, M. T. Robin for illustrations, and Noëlline Coudouel for technical assistance.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 26, 2000; Accepted October 4, 2000
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and by National Institutes of Health Grants DK53981 (T.W.G.) and MH59931 (S.M.L.).
Send reprint requests to: Isabelle Limon-Boulez, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS ESA 7080, Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Reproduction, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France. E-mail: isabelle.limon-boulez{at}snv.jussieu.fr
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AR, adrenoceptor;
AC, adenylyl cyclase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
[
-32P]AA-GTP, 4-azido-anilido-[
-32P]GTP;
PTX, pertussis toxin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|

subunits.
FASEB J
12:
1019-1025
2-adrenoceptors in human and rat myometrium and differential expression during pregnancy.
Br J Pharmacol
122:
1732-1738[Medline].
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in a cell type-specific manner.
J Biol Chem
267:
24045-24052
2-adrenergic receptors to two G-proteins with opposing effects. Subtype-selective coupling of
2C10,
2C4 and
2C2 adrenergic receptors to Gi and Gs.
J Biol Chem
267:
15795-15801
2-adrenergic receptor subtype coupling to Gs.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
696-702[Abstract].
subunits.
Nature (Lond)
356:
159-161[Medline].
-subunits by partial agonists of the human 5-HT1A receptor.
Biochemistry
33:
4283-4290[Medline].
2-adrenergic receptors.
J Biol Chem
266:
11915-11921
2-/
2-adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylyl cyclase system in rat myometrium during pregnancy.
J Biol Chem
270:
11012-11016
-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 for G protein 
subunits.
FEBS Lett
401:
25-29[Medline].
-32P]-GTP-azidoanilide.
Methods Enzymol
195:
286-301[Medline].
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes to cyclic AMP-dependent reporter gene expression in transiently transfected JEG-3 cells.
Mol Pharmacol
44:
802-809[Abstract].
and Gi3
during gestation.
FEBS Lett
278:
4-8[Medline].
subunits.
Science (Wash DC)
254:
1500-1503
2-adrenergic receptor gene in pregnant rat myometrium.
J Biol Chem
267:
7975-7978This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Cikos, P. Rehak, S. Czikkova, J. Vesela, and J. Koppel Expression of adrenergic receptors in mouse preimplantation embryos and ovulated oocytes Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1139 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dupuis, A. Levy, and S. Mhaouty-Kodja Functional Coupling of Rat Myometrial {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptors to Gh{alpha}/Tissue Transglutaminase 2 during Pregnancy J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19257 - 19263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||