Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology Research Institute,
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
 |
Introduction |
The
signaling properties of
subunit of Gz protein
(G
z) are very similar to the three
G
i subtypes. All G protein-coupled receptors
that have been shown to interact with Gz are
known couplers of Gi proteins (Fields and Casey,
1997
; Ho and Wong, 1998
). Although the overall amino acid identity of
G
z and G
i2 is about
60%, they inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC) in a similar fashion (Wong et
al., 1992
; Kozasa and Gilman, 1995
). The sequence identities are even
higher when only their C-terminal halves are compared, where the
putative receptor- and effector-interacting domains were located.
However, subtle differences are found between the amino acid sequences
of G
i2 and G
z, which
suggest that they may use different structural elements to achieve
similar functions. Incorporation of the last five residues of either
G
i2 or G
z, which
shared very low homology to each other, to the corresponding region of
G
q broadened its receptor coupling profile to
both Gq- and Gi-linked
receptors (Conklin et al., 1993
). However, the replacement of the last
36 amino acids of G
z with those of
G
t1 did not block the coupling of the
resultant G
z/G
t1 to
Gi-linked receptors (Tsu et al., 1997
). Indeed, a
number of studies suggested that the amino terminus of G
subunit
might be crucial for receptor coupling (Hamm et al., 1988
; Kostenis et
al., 1997
). Furthermore, a stretch of amino acids, 220 to 240 of
G
16, has been shown to be essential for
receptor coupling (Lee et al., 1995
). It prompted us to identify the
essential determinants of G
z for specifying its receptor coupling property.
The effector interacting domains of various G
subunits are generally
localized at the C-terminal half of the amino acid sequence (Berlot and
Bourne, 1992
; Medina et al., 1996
; Grishina and Berlot, 1997
).
Although G
s and G
i2
regulate AC in opposite fashions, they have evolved similar and
different stretches of amino acids for effector interactions (Berlot
and Bourne, 1992
; Grishina and Berlot, 1997
). The AC inhibiting
residues of G
i2 were localized at the Switch
II region (similar to G
s) and
4/
6 loop
(unlike G
s) by alanine mutagenesis (Grishina
and Berlot, 1997
). It is unclear if regions similar to those found in
G
i2 are responsible for effector interaction
in G
z. Interestingly, mutations of the acylation-modified N-terminal residues altered the constitutive inhibitory action of G
z to AC (Wilson and
Bourne, 1995
). Moreover, alanine substitution of the protein kinase
C-phosphorylation sites of mutationally active
G
z attenuated its inhibitory effect on AC (Ho
and Wong, 1997
). It is still possible that the N-terminus of
G
z is also involved in effector regulation.
We attempted to localize the receptor interacting as well as AC
inhibiting domains of G
z by constructing
chimeric G
subunits using G
z and
G
t1. G
t1 is
approximately 60% identical with G
z; hence,
their tertiary structures should have considerable resemblance. Within
the G
i-subfamily, G
t1
is primarily coupled to rhodopsin and regulates cGMP phosphodiesterase.
Introduction of G
t1 portions into a
G
z backbone would be expected to have minimal
interference on the protein folding and AC inhibition. Desired
recombinant proteins were transiently expressed in human embryonic
kidney (HEK) 293 cells and the functions of the chimeras were assessed in two aspects. To study the receptor coupling events, the abilities of
chimeric G
subunits to couple to
-opioid receptor (DOR) were monitored by the 
-mediated stimulation of type 2 adenylyl cyclase (AC2). For studying the effector interaction, the abilities of the
chimeras to inhibit isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP accumulation upon the
activation of DOR were monitored. Another series of chimeras were
constructed with a point mutation that rendered GTPase-deficient phenotypes (Freissmuth and Gilman, 1989
; Graziano and Gilman, 1989
).
They were applied to investigate the constitutively inhibitory effects
of the chimeras on isoproterenol-stimulated AC activity.
 |
Experimental Procedures |
Materials.
AC2 and DOR cDNA were gifts from Randall Reed
(Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) and Christopher Evans
(University of California, Los Angeles, CA), respectively. Pertussis
toxin (PTX) was purchased from List Biological Laboratories, Inc.
(Campbell, CA). HEK 293 cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (Rockville, MD).
[d-Pen2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE)
was from Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA). Antisera against
G
z and G
t1 were from
Gramsch Laboratories (Schwabhausen, Germany) and Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY), respectively.
[3H]Adenine was purchased from Amersham
(Buckinghamshire, UK). Plasmid purification columns were obtained from
Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). Taq DNA polymerase, customized
primers, restriction endonucleases, and cell culture reagents were
obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Grand Island, NY). All other
chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Construction of Chimeric
Subunits.
A complete list of
chimeric and mutational G
subunits is shown in Table
1. The chimeras zt40 and zt43 were
constructed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a pair of chimeric
primers (Table 2). The full-length PCR
product was sequenced using Sequenase Version 2.0 DNA sequencing kit
from Amersham. Other chimeras were constructed by making use of
convenient unique restriction sites and exchanging the corresponding
restriction fragments of G
t1, zt40, or zt43
with G
z (Table 1). For example, the junctional restriction sites of tz36, tz60, and tz143 are BglII,
AflIII, and BamHI, respectively. The insertion
mutant +4t and PTX-resistant G
t1CG mutant were
made by PCR using G
t1 as the template, and +4t/CG is generated by combining +4t and G
t1CG
together through restriction cutting.
4z Is derived from
G
z with the residues 11 to 14 deleted. For
si143 and sz143, the portion of G
s was obtained by partial digestion with BamHI and then ligation
with the C-terminal portion of either G
i2 or
G
z. GTPase-deficient mutants of various
chimeras were made by replacing G
t1 and
G
z with G
t1RC (Ho et
al., 1999
) and G
zQL (Wong et al. 1992
),
respectively in the construction procedures. All the cDNA constructs
were subcloned in the mammalian expression vector pcDNAI at
EcoRI site.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
List of mutational and chimeric G subunits
Except for the last three constructs, the nomenclatures of the chimeras
are according to the parental G subunits (templates) and the numbers
of amino acids of G z present in the chimeras. All chimeras
are constructed either by PCR using the primers listed in Table 2 or by
restriction digestion (RD) of templates and subsequent ligation. The
restriction sites shown are the junctional sites of the ligated
fragments.
|
|
Transfection of HEK 293 Cells and cAMP Accumulation Assay.
HEK 293 cells were cultured with Eagle's minimal essential medium
(MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (v/v), 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2. They were cotransfected with
various recombinant DNA constructs using DEAE-dextran/chloroquine
method as described previously (Wong, 1994
). Transfected cells were
labeled with 1 µCi/ml of [3H]adenine in MEM
with 1% fetal calf serum and treated with 100 ng/ml PTX as
appropriate. Labeled cells were treated with proper receptor agonists
in 20 mM HEPES-buffered MEM with 1 mM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine for
30 min and the reactions were terminated by adding ice-cold 5%
trichloroacetic acid with 1 mM ATP. Separation of labeled cAMP from
other nucleotides was achieved by sequential ion exchange chromatography as described previously (Salomon, 1991
). The cAMP levels
were interpreted as the ratios of the counts per minute of
[3H]cAMP fractions to those of
[3H]ATP fractions and expressed as [cAMP/(cAMP + Total) × 1000]. Absolute values for cAMP accumulation varied
between experiments, but variability within a given set of transfection
was in general <10%. Data shown in the figures were the mean ± S.E.M. of three to five individual experiments performed in triplicate.
ANOVA and paired t test with 95% confidence was used to
analyze the significance between different treatment groups.
Western Blotting Analysis.
Crude membrane proteins from HEK
293 cells transfected with various chimeric G
subunits were
extracted as described previously (Ho and Wong, 1997
). Each protein
sample (50 µg) was resolved in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and
transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Antiserum 3A-170
(Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany) against the
carboxyl terminus of G
z was used for the detection of G
z, tz, and ztz chimeras, whereas
G
t1, zt40, and zt43 were identified with
anti-G
t1 antiserum (Transduction Laboratories).
 |
Results |
The Role of the C-Terminus of G
z in Coupling with
DOR.
The abilities of chimeric G
subunits to couple to DOR were
monitored by the 
-mediated stimulation of AC2. This reporter system is advantageous because it could be generally applied to assess
the coupling between different categories of receptor-G protein pairs
without considering the functions of the G
subunits. Moreover, AC2
is relatively insensitive to G
i-mediated
inhibition (Taussig et al., 1994
). It eliminates the possibility that
G
z and 
complex act on AC2 in an
antagonistic fashion. The AC2 system is especially useful for checking
the receptor coupling efficiencies of particular chimeric G
subunits
that have lost the integrity of effector interacting domains. A
schematic representation of the first series of chimeric G
subunits
was shown in Fig. 1A. We attempted to
examine the importance of the C-terminal tail of
G
z on receptor coupling using this series of
chimeras. In the vector control, HEK 293 cells expressing
G
sQL, DOR, and AC2 were treated with or
without PTX. Addition of 100 nM DPDPE stimulated the cAMP production to
about two times the basal level in the absence of PTX treatment (Fig.
1B). The DPDPE-induced enhancement was abolished in cells treated with
PTX, indicating that the coupling between DOR and the endogenous
Gi proteins was obstructed. Coexpression of
recombinant G
z provided a larger pool of G
protein trimers capable of coupling to DOR; hence, in the absence of
PTX treatment, a 150% enhancement of the cAMP production was observed
compared with the corresponding response in vector control. PTX
treatment partially reduced the cAMP level of
G
z-expressing cells, which suggested that
Gz could functionally replace the role of
endogenous Gi and mediated the DPDPE-induced cAMP
production in a PTX-resistant manner. In the case of
G
t1, the response in the absence of PTX treatment was significantly lower than that of vector control and was
close to the basal value. Suppression of 
-mediated AC2 activity
was caused by the strong 
-scavenging property of
G
t1. Moreover, there was no increase of cAMP
level in cells treated with PTX, which inactivated endogenous
Gi and the recombinant Gt1.
These results are consistent with those reported earlier (Tsu et al.,
1997
).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The first series of chimeric G subunits and
receptor-mediated regulation of AC2. The parental (G z
and G t1) and chimeric G subunits are diagrammatically
shown in A. B, mutationally active G sQL (0.025 µg/ml),
AC2 (0.25 µg/ml), DOR (0.25 µg/ml), and 0.25 µg/ml of one of the
G subunits in A were coexpressed in HEK 293 cells. Transfected cells
were treated with or without 100 ng/ml PTX as indicated. cAMP levels
were measured in the absence or presence of 100 nM DPDPE. Asterisks
indicate the DPDPE-induced cAMP levels are significantly higher than
those of vector control.
|
|
One of our recent studies showed that the
G
z/G
t1 and
G
z/G
i2 chimeras
containing the last 36 amino acids of G
t1 and
G
i2, respectively, can couple to DOR
efficiently (Tsu et al., 1997
). To determine whether the N-terminus is
required for receptor coupling, a reversed chimera tz36, an
G
t1 subunit with the C-terminal 36 residues of
G
z (Fig. 1A, the third construct), was
constructed and examined for its ability to couple to DOR. In this
assay system, tz36 did not release 
subunits for stimulating AC2
upon DOR activation (Fig. 1B). Subsequent substitution of larger
C-terminal portions of G
t1 with
G
z sequence up to 143 amino acids (tz60 and
tz143) also did not rescue the coupling to DOR. Two other chimeras
sz143 and si143 (Fig. 1A, the sixth and seventh constructs) were
constructed by replacing the C-terminal tail of
G
s with that of G
z or
G
i2 portions. These two chimeras resembled
tz143 and did not release 
complex for AC2 stimulation upon DOR
activation. These results further suggested neither the C-terminal 143 amino acids of G
i2 nor
G
z could rescue the receptor coupling and the loss of function of tz143, sz143, and si143 may not be related to the
choice of parental G
subunits for chimera construction. Obviously,
other essential receptor interacting regions were located on the
N-terminal half of G
z sequence.
The last three chimeras of this series were constructed as mirror
images of tz36, tz60, and tz143. The chimeras were denoted as zt319,
zt295, and zt212, respectively (Fig. 1A, the eighth to tenth
constructs; numbers refer to the last amino acid of
G
z). Replacement of the C-terminal tail of
G
z with that of G
t1
may alter its coupling to DOR. However, all three zt chimeras seemed to
couple to DOR and showed substantial increases of cAMP accumulation in
the absence of PTX treatment (enhanced by 60, 50, and 65% for zt319,
zt295, and zt212, respectively; see Fig. 1B). These results further
reinforced the idea that the C-terminal 143 amino acids of
G
z are sufficient for receptor recognition and
some critical structural elements are located on the N-terminal half of
G
z. Because these zt chimeras acquired the
C-terminal tail of G
t1, they should be
sensitive to PTX-mediated inactivation. Accordingly, there was no
increment of cAMP levels in all three cases when the cells were
pretreated with PTX (Fig. 1B).
The N-Terminus of
z Is Essential for Receptor
Coupling.
Recent studies highlighted the importance of the
N-terminus of G
subunit for receptor specificity (Kostenis et al.,
1997
). A second series of chimeras were thus constructed to
verify the role of the N-terminus of G
z on DOR
coupling. The chimera zt40 was constructed so that the N-terminal helix
became G
z-like (Fig. 2A, the third construct). In the absence
of PTX, DPDPE-induced enhancement of cAMP accumulation in
zt40-transfected cells resembled that of
G
z-transfected cells. However, zt40 is
PTX-sensitive because it acquired the C-terminus of
G
t1 and the DPDPE-induced cAMP production was
abolished in the presence of PTX (Fig. 2B). This result suggested that
the N-terminal region of G
z was an essential
determinant for receptor coupling. The chimera ztz40/36 was then
constructed based on zt40 and tz36 (Fig. 2A, the fourth construct) to
check whether the inclusion of the G
z-specific C-terminus would confer PTX resistance to the ztz40/36 chimera. The
phenotype of ztz40/36 was more or less the same as
G
z, except that the percentage response over
basal value was slightly lower than that of G
z
(Fig. 2B). It suggested that the C-terminus of G
z only conferred PTX-resistance but did not
further enhance the receptor coupling efficiency. Two other ztz
chimeras, ztz40/60 and ztz40/143 (Fig. 2A, sixth and seventh
constructs), were also able to couple to DOR and stimulate AC2 to
slightly greater degree than ztz40/36 (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The second series of chimeric G subunits and
receptor-mediated regulation of ACs. The parental (G z
and G t1) and chimeric G subunits are diagrammatically
shown in A. B, HEK 293 cells were transfected, labeled, and treated as
indicated in the legend to Fig. 1B. Basal cAMP levels ranged from
4.11 ± 0.33 to 6.72 ± 0.18. Single and double asterisks
indicate that the basal and DPDPE-induced cAMP levels, respectively,
are significantly higher than those of vector control. C, HEK 293 cells
were cotransfected with 2AR (0.15 µg/ml), DOR (0.025 µg/ml), and 0.25 µg/ml of one of the G subunits in A. Transfected cells were all treated with 100 ng/ml PTX. cAMP production
was triggered by treating the cells with 10 µM isoproterenol alone or
in the presence of 100 nM DPDPE. DPDPE-induced inhibition was expressed
as percentage inhibition of the isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP levels
that ranged from 10.55 ± 1.78 to 14.08 ± 1.24. Asterisks
indicate the DPDPE-induced inhibition of cAMP production is
significantly greater than that of vector control.
|
|
G
z has distinct biochemical properties in that
the loading and hydrolysis of GTP by G
z are
much slower than other G
subunits (Casey et al., 1990
). The main
reason is correlated to the variance of sequence identity in the G-1
GTP-binding region (amino acids 41-43). It is unknown whether the
triplet variations affect the receptor coupling efficacies of the
chimeras. zt43 and the corresponding series of ztz chimeras (ztz43/36,
ztz43/60, and ztz43/143) were made so that the G-1 region resembled the
G
z sequence (Fig. 2A, the seven to tenth
constructs). However, the profile of responses was similar to the zt40
series. All three ztz chimeras with N-terminal 43 residues of
G
z but not zt43 coupled to DOR and stimulated AC2 in the presence of PTX (Fig. 2B). The results eliminated the assumption that the variation of the G-1 GTP-binding region of G
z affected the receptor interaction and
subsequent release of 
subunits.
The Amino Acids 11 to 14 of
z Are Essential for
Receptor Coupling.
The N-terminus of G
t1
is considerably divergent from those of G
i2
and G
z in two aspects. First, the N-terminus
of G
z is more homologous to
G
i2 (47.1%) than to
G
t1 (33.3%). Second, the length of the
theoretical N-terminal helix of G
t1 is shorter than G
i2 or G
z by
four amino acids (Fig. 3A). Progressive
deletion of the six N-terminal residues of G
q
broadened its receptor coupling specificity (Kostenis et al., 1997
). It
is conceivable that the length of the N-terminal region of the chimeras
may affect receptor activation. In the case of zt40, its ability to
couple to DOR may be attributable to the elongation of its N-terminal
region. To test this possibility, an insertion mutant of
G
t1 was constructed by inserting the four
residues of G
z between residues 10 and 11 of
G
t1. The cysteine residue at
4 position of
the C-terminus of G
t1 was mutated into glycine
and the G
t1 mutant (termed +4t/CG) became
resistant to PTX-mediated inactivation. This mutation allowed us to
examine the coupling of +4t/CG with DOR without the interference caused
by endogenous Gi proteins. In the presence of
PTX, application of DPDPE can induce a modest increase of cAMP level in
+4t/CG-transfected cells, which is significantly higher than that of
G
t1CG- or vector-transfected cells (Fig. 3B).
It indicated that +4t/CG can indeed couple to DOR in a PTX-insensitive
manner although the response is relatively weak (~40% increase as
compared with the basal). To further confirm the role of these four
amino acids, a deletion mutant of G
z was constructed with the amino acids 11 to 14 removed (termed
4z) and the
mutant was tested for its ability to recognize DOR. In AC2 assays,
4z-transfected cells showed only slight reduction of DPDPE-induced
cAMP accumulation compared with G
z (Fig. 3B). The reduction of response was also observed when the cells were pretreated with PTX. It suggested that residues 11 to 14 of
G
z form one of the minor determinants for DOR
coupling. The reduction of DOR-induced inhibitory response in
4z-transfected cells is probably independent to its expression level
(Fig. 4) and effector interaction. A
constitutively active mutant of
4z,
4z/QL, inhibited isoproterenol-induced cAMP production in the cells cotransfected with
2-adrenoceptor to a similar extent as
G
zQL (Fig. 3C). Overall, these results
strongly suggested that the N-terminal residues 11 to 14 of
G
z are involved in receptor recognition.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Amino acids 11 to 14 of G z are
essential for DOR coupling. A, the sequences of the two termini of
G z, G t1, and three mutants were aligned.
Deletion of the residues 11 to 14 of G z yielded the
mutant 4z. A cysteine-to-glycine mutation was introduced to the 4
position of G t1 to form G t1CG. +4t/CG was
made by inserting the residues 11 to 14 of G z between
residues 10 and 11 of G t1CG. Underlined residues are the
mutated and inserted residues. B, HEK 293 cells were transfected,
labeled, and treated as indicated in the legend to Fig. 1B. Basal cAMP
levels ranged from 4.51 ± 0.73 to 5.45 ± 0.44. Single and
double asterisks indicate that the basal and DPDPE-induced cAMP levels,
respectively, are significantly higher than those of vector control. C,
HEK 293 cells were cotransfected with 0.15 µg/ml of
2AR and 0.25 µg/ml of one of the G subunits. cAMP
production was triggered by treating the cells with 10 µM
isoproterenol. The cAMP levels were expressed as percentage responses
of G z. WT, wild type; QL, active mutant.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Western blotting analysis of chimeric G subunits.
0.25 µg/ml of each chimeric G subunit cDNA was transfected into
HEK 293 cells and membrane proteins were extracted for immunodetection.
Antisera specific against G t1 and G z were
applied for blots in A and B, respectively. Two individual experiments
using different batches of protein samples showed similar results.
|
|
Protein Expression of Chimeric G
Subunits.
Membrane
proteins of the cells transfected with various chimeras studied here
were separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis and the chimeras were
detected by specific antisera. The expression levels of zt40 and zt43
were similar to tz36, but lower than G
t1 in
HEK 293 cells as detected by an anti-G
t1
antiserum (Fig. 4A). Both G
t1CG and +4t/CG
were expressed strongly in HEK 293 cells. Detection with an antiserum
against the last 15 residues of G
z facilitated
direct comparison of the expression levels of various chimeras (Fig.
4B). All chimeric
subunits were expressed to similar levels in HEK
293 cells as G
z. The results indicated that
most of the chimeras studied here are expressed to similar levels.
Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of AC by Chimeric
Subunits.
Some of the chimeras contained increasing lengths of C-terminal
tails of G
z, and could serve as useful tools
for localizing the AC-inhibiting regions on
G
z. Thus, we tested these chimeras for their
ability to inhibit AC. HEK 293 cells transfected with
2-adrenoceptor, DOR, and a parental or
chimeric G
subunit were pretreated with PTX and then stimulated with
10 µM isoproterenol to elevate the intracellular cAMP level.
Coadministration of DPDPE to the cells expressing
G
z showed about 30 to 40% reduction of isoproterenol-induced cAMP level, which was not observed in the cases
of vector control or G
t1-transfected cells
(Fig. 2C). Both zt40 and zt43-transfected cells lacked DPDPE-induced
inhibition of AC activity. The N-terminal
G
z-specific sequence of these two chimeras did
not contain sufficient structural elements for AC inhibition. Next, we
examined the six ztz chimeras, because it has been shown that the
N-terminal region of G
z was important for the
coupling to DOR. ztz40/36 and ztz43/36 showed no significant inhibitory
effect on the cAMP levels (Fig. 2C). Chimeras containing 60 or more
C-terminal amino acids of G
z inhibited AC
significantly. Such results indicated that one of the essential AC
inhibitory domains must be located within amino acids 296 to 319 of
G
z.
Inhibition of AC by Constitutively Active Chimeric G
Subunits.
Introduction of a point mutation at the GTP-binding
regions of G
subunit created receptor-independent constitutively
active mutants (Freissmuth and Gilman, 1989
; Graziano and Gilman,
1989
). This approach has been successfully applied for studying the
effector interacting domains of various G
subunits even when the
receptor interacting domains were disrupted in the chimeras (Medina et al., 1996
; Grishina and Berlot, 1997
). For the constructs used in this
study, Arg-174 of the G
t1 domain and Gln-205
of the G
z portion were mutated to cysteine and
leucine, respectively, and these chimeras were used to examine the
receptor-independent constitutive inhibition of AC activity. Results
are summarized in Fig. 5. As a positive
control, the G
z mutant
G
zQL (Wong et al., 1992
) inhibited isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP level by 40 to 50% compared with the
vector control, whereas G
t1 exhibited no
observable inhibition on the AC activity. Among the three tz chimeras,
tz60(RC) and tz143(RC) inhibited AC significantly, albeit to a lesser
extent than that of G
zQL. Among the three zt
chimeras, only zt319(QL) inhibited AC efficiently. Of the six ztz
chimeras, only four
ztz40/60(RC), ztz40/143(RC), ztz43/60(RC), and
ztz43/143(RC)
were able to inhibit AC significantly. The degrees of
inhibition for all these chimeras were comparable with each other but
slightly weaker than G
zQL. The protein
expression levels of all these constitutively active chimeras were
similar to each other and also comparable with those of their wild-type
counterparts (Fig. 4). Collectively, the results confirmed the
essential role of amino acids 295 to 319 of G
z for AC inhibition because all chimeras that possess the ability to
inhibit AC contained this stretch of residues from
G
z.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Constitutive inhibition of AC by mutationally active
chimeric G subunits. HEK 293 cells were cotransfected with 0.15 µg/ml of 2AR and 0.25 µg/ml of one of the G
subunits. cAMP production was triggered by treating the cells with 10 µM isoproterenol. The cAMP levels of the chimera-transfected cells
were expressed as percentage inhibition of the mean value of the
isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP levels of the vector control. Asterisks
indicate the cAMP levels are significantly greater than the vector
control.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
Gz is not simply a PTX-resistant substitute
of the three Gi subtypes but it may be involved
in a number of novel signaling events. The specific functional
interactions of G
z with newly discovered
proteins such as RGSZ1 (Glick et al., 1998
), Rap1GAP (Meng et al.,
1999
), and GRIN1 (Chen et al., 1999
) suggested that G
z has its distinct roles in signal
transduction in addition to the regulation of ACs. Localization of the
functional domains of G
z could provide
valuable information for a better understanding of the roles of
G
z in different molecular events. The present study investigated the receptor and AC-interacting domains of G
z. Two major findings could be concluded.
First, the N-terminal sequence of G
z seemed to
be a critical determinant for the coupling to DOR. Second, one of the
AC inhibiting domains of G
z is located at
amino acids 296-319.
A series of chimera studies indicated that the last five amino acids of
G
subunits are essential for determining the receptor specificity
(Conklin et al., 1993
, 1996
). The last five amino acids of
G
t1 are identical with those of
G
i2 (Fig. 6),
yet G
t1 primarily couples to rhodopsin. Both
an evolutionary trace analysis (Lichtarge et al., 1996
) and an
extensive mutagenesis study (Onrust et al., 1997
) suggested that
residues spanning the whole
5 helix of the GTPase domain of G
subunit interacts with receptor. Moreover, a recent study indicated
that the intramolecular interaction between the GTPase and helical
domains (
4/
3 and
G/
4 loops) of G
subunit is important
for receptor-mediated activation (Marsh et al., 1998
). The series of tz
chimeras retaining up to 143 C-terminal G
z
residues essentially covered all the regions identified in the previous studies for receptor-mediated activation. The lack of DOR coupling with
tz chimeras clearly indicated that the N-terminal half of G
subunit
also contain essential elements for receptor coupling.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Alignment of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions
of G i2, G t1, and G z.
Portions of the amino acid sequences of G i2,
G t1, and G z were extracted from their
complete alignment using CLUSTAL X program (numbers in brackets
indicate the positions of the residues; Jeanmougin et al., 1998 ). The
strictly and homologously conserved amino acids are marked with
asterisks and dots, respectively, at the bottom of the aligned
sequences. A, inverted and underlined
residues are essential and nonessential for receptor coupling,
respectively (Conklin et al., 1993 ; Beck et al., 1997 ; Ho and Wong,
1997 ; Onrust et al., 1997 ). B, inverted and
underlined residues are important and unrelated to
effector interactions, respectively (Faurobert et al., 1993 ; Spickofsky
et al., 1994 ; Grishina and Berlot, 1997 ).
|
|
Alignment of the amino acid sequences of G
i2,
G
z, and G
t1 yielded
useful information (Fig. 6). The most interesting point is that the
N-terminal helix of G
t1 is 4 amino acids
shorter than G
i2 and
G
z, but the charge distribution of the aligned residues are reasonably similar. A fair prediction would be the length
of the N-terminal helix determined the receptor coupling efficiency.
The phenotypes of the mutants +4t/CG and
4z (Fig. 3) supported the
importance of N-terminus of G
subunit in receptor coupling. Recent
studies on the receptor coupling of G
q also support this notion. Deletion of the N-terminal six amino acids of
G
q allowed the mutant to be activated by
Gi-linked receptors (Kostenis et al., 1997
).
Alignment of the N-terminal sequences of various G
subunits showed
that the first six residues were unique for
G
q. Indeed, the sequence identities and
lengths of the N-terminal helices of different G
subunits are very
divergent and may be related to the peculiarities of the functions of
each G
subunit. For example, the N-terminal residues of
G
q are involved in membrane attachment (in
addition to the palmitate attached) and phospholipase C activation
(Hepler et al., 1996
). In one of our previous studies (Ho and Wong,
1997
), mutation of the two protein kinase C-phosphorylation sites at
the N-terminus of G
z abolished its
constitutive inhibitory effect on AC. Further studies on the roles of
N-terminal residues of other G
subunits should provide more insights
on their specific functions.
The crystal structures of trimeric G proteins (Wall et al., 1995
;
Lambright et al., 1996
) provided clear evidence that the N-terminus of
G
subunit is one of the major 
-interacting sites. An early
study of the interaction between G
o and 
subunits suggested that the reduction of the length of the N-terminus
of G
o by four residues (positions 7-10)
diminishes its binding to 
subunits (Denker et al., 1992
).
Preservation of the integrity of the N-terminal helix seems to be
necessary for binding 
subunits properly. In the present study,
changes in the ability of the chimeras to associate with the 
subunits might affect their coupling efficiencies to DOR. Moreover, it
has been suggested that the N-terminal helix of G
subunit is
sandwiched by G
subunit and receptor (Wall et al., 1995
; Lichtarge
et al., 1996
), and it may play a role in transmitting the
conformational changes of ligand-bound receptor to the subsequent
intra-and intermolecular conformational changes of G protein trimer.
Additional studies are required to address these possibilities.
One of the well-characterized representatives in the
G
i-subfamily in effector interaction is
G
i2, which is probably the closest member to
G
z. Berlot and coworkers have identified a region of 79 amino acids of G
i2, which was
sufficient to convey the AC inhibition (Medina et al., 1996
). The
residues of G
i2 for effector regulation were
resolved eventually using alanine mutagenesis by the same laboratory
(Grishina and Berlot, 1997
) and they are localized on two structural
elements of G
i2, the Switch II region and the
4/
6 loop. Our results coincided with the findings in
G
i2, the amino acids 291 to 314 of
G
z actually corresponded to
4/
6 loop on
the GTPase domain of G
z. The same loop
structure (but not the same residues at the corresponding positions) in
G
s, G
i2, and
G
t1 has also been shown to be an effector
interacting region (Berlot and Bourne, 1992
; Spickofsky et al., 1994
;
Grishina and Berlot, 1997
; Natochin et al., 1999
). It is interesting
that different categories of G protein-regulated effector enzymes have
evolved to interact with the similar structural elements of various
G
subunits. The
4/
6 loop may be more than just a structural
element bearing a single function. Using
G
t1/G
i1 chimeras, Bae
et al. (1997)
showed that the area bounded by the
4 helix and the
4/
6 loop of G
i1 is important for the
coupling of 5-HT1B receptor. Subsequent studies
by the same group (Bae et al., 1999
) demonstrated that two
4 helical
residues in G
i1 (Gln-304 and Glu-308) are
critical determinants of receptor-G protein coupling. In the present
study, the incorporation of the
4/
6 loop of
G
z in the G
t1
backbone (such as tz60 and tz143) did not allow coupling to DOR.
Although the
4 helix of G
z might be
involved in receptor recognition, it alone was insufficient to support
coupling to DOR.
We did not investigate further the importance of the Switch II region
of G
z on AC inhibition because
G
t1 and G
z have
sequences identical with G
i2 at that region
(Fig. 6) and so the corresponding region of
G
t1 could provide essentially the same
effector interacting residues. Inhibition of AC by
G
z was not related to the N-terminal sequence
of G
z because the constitutively active
chimera tz60(RC) already exerted the inhibitory action (Fig. 4). The
contribution of the variation of the G-1 GTP-binding region of
G
z to the regulation of AC was only minimal
(Fig. 2C). It implied that the slow GTP hydrolysis rate of
G
z might not be related to the abilities of the chimeras to inhibit AC.
In conclusion, this report provides clear evidence that the N-terminal
helix of G
z (and possibly that of
G
i) is crucial for receptor-mediated
activation. The length of the N-terminal helix is also critical for
determining the efficiency of receptor coupling. The AC-inhibiting
domains of G
z seem to be very similar to those
of G
i2, including the
4/
6 loop and
Switch II region. Our results strongly suggested that
G
z inhibited AC in a fashion similar to other
inhibitory G
subunits.
This work was supported in part by the Hong Kong Jockey Club
and Grants HKUST 567/95M and 6096/98M from the Research Grants Council
of Hong Kong to Y.H.W.