MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nanoff, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nanoff, C.

Vol. 56, Issue 5, 1014-1024, November 1999


Tight Association of the Human Mel1a-Melatonin Receptor and Gi: Precoupling and Constitutive Activity

Florian Roka, Lena Brydon, Maria Waldhoer, A. Donny Strosberg, Michael Freissmuth, Ralf Jockers, and Christian Nanoff

Institute of Pharmacology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (F.R., M.W., M.F., C.N.), and Institut Cochin de Genétique Moléculaire, Paris, France (L.B., A.D.S., R.J.)

    Summary
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

If stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells, the human Mel1a-melatonin receptor activates Gi-dependent, pertussis toxin-sensitive signaling pathways, i.e., inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta ; the latter on condition that Gq is coactivated. The antagonist luzindole blocks the effects of melatonin and acts as an inverse agonist at the Mel1a receptor in both intact cells and isolated membranes. This suggests that the Mel1a receptor is endowed with constitutive activity, a finding confirmed on reconstitution of the Mel1a receptor with Gi. Because the receptor density is in the physiological range, constitutive activity is not an artifact arising from overexpression of the receptor. In addition, the following findings indicate that the Mel1a receptor forms a very tight complex with Gi which can be observed both in the presence and absence of an agonist. 1) In intact cells and in membranes, high-affinity agonist binding is resistant to the destabilizing effect of guanine nucleotides. 2) The ability to bind an agonist with high affinity is preserved even after exposure of the cells to pertussis toxin, because a fraction of Gi is inaccessible to the toxin in cells expressing Mel1a receptors (but not the A1-adenosine receptor, another Gi-coupled receptor). 3) An antiserum directed against the Mel1a receptor coprecipitates Gi even in the absence of an agonist. We therefore conclude that the Mel1a receptor is tightly precoupled and that its constitutive activity may play a role in pacing the biological clock, an action known to involve the melatonin receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Melatonin, the N-acetyl-5-methoxy metabolite of serotonin, is a hormone known for its ability to adjust the circadian clock and to induce seasonal changes in reproductive physiology (in animals with breeding seasons). Regulation of circadian physiology by melatonin is believed to be mediated primarily by a specific receptor, the melatonin1a (Mel1a) receptor, which is enriched in hypothalamic nuclei and in the pars tuberalis of the adenohypohyseal gland. In addition, the effect of melatonin on the circadian clock involves a second receptor that, as opposed to the Mel1a receptor, has a very low expression level and does not mediate inhibition of neuronal activity in the nucleus suprachiasmaticus, the site of the master clock (Liu et al., 1997). Both the Mel1a receptor and the second, unidentified receptor are G protein-coupled receptors. The small family of melatonin receptors comprises only three members, two of them, the Mel1a- and Mel1b receptors, are present in mammals. The melatonin receptors share little sequence homology with other receptor types, hence, they seem to have emerged early in the course of receptor evolution (for a review, see Dubocovich, 1995).

The pharmacological identification of melatonin receptors has relied largely on the labeling of receptors in brain slices with the agonist radioligand 2-[125I]iodomelatonin, which is endowed with high affinity and a low level of nonspecific binding. Because of the highly discrete expression of melatonin receptors, the signaling pathways became amenable to detailed characterization only after cloning and heterologous expression of the recombinant receptor. Signaling by melatonin is sensitive to pertussis toxin (PTX) (White et al., 1987; Carlson et al., 1989) and in accordance with these findings, the recombinant Mel1a receptor couples to G proteins of the Gi/Go class, leading to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (Witt-Enderby and Dubocovich, 1996). Additional signaling pathways activated by the Mel1a receptor (arachidonic acid release, Ca2+-release) were similarly suppressed by PTX, confirming the assumption that the receptor interacts predominantly with Gi (Godson and Reppert, 1997).

The ligand for the Mel1a receptor, melatonin, is produced in and secreted by the pineal gland. A regular phenomenon in vertebrate physiology, melatonin levels are elevated during the night. The biochemical basis for the circadian changes in melatonin levels was found in the variable activity of serotonin N-acetyltransferase, which catalyzes melatonin production (Gastel et al., 1998). Daylight reduces the stability of the enzyme toward proteasomal degradation. Not only the melatonin production but also the melatonin receptors are regulated in a diurnal rhythm (Tenn and Niles, 1993; Gauer et al., 1994; Neu and Niles, 1997); during the day the level of iodomelatonin binding to membranes from hypothalamic nuclei increases and drops again in the evening, before the hormone level rises. Thus, the melatonin receptor-expressing cell adapts to the day-night rhythm in a fashion that is inversely related to the ambient melatonin levels. Because the melatonin receptor is considered a potential drug target, variations in the expression level may cause therapeutically relevant changes in the response to administered melatonin receptor ligands. We have therefore generated a stable human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cell line in which the receptor is expressed to a density that presumably occurs in neuronal cells, given the cellular heterogeneity of brain tissue preparations and the distinct distribution of Mel1a receptors (several hundred femtomoles per milligram of membrane protein, Barrett et al., 1996). We report that if expressed in HEK293 cells, the Mel1a receptor reveals a marked degree of spontaneous activity. In addition, the Mel1a receptor exhibits features that are not predicted by the classical model of receptor/G protein (R/G) coupling. For example, whereas signal transduction of the Mel1a receptor is strongly reduced by PTX, the receptor retains the ability to bind an agonist ligand with high affinity after PTX treatment. We have examined this phenotype and find that the receptor forms a highly stable complex with Gi, such that the G protein alpha  subunit is shielded from PTX. The mode of Mel1a R/G coupling also results in a high basal activity of the receptor, i.e., the receptor is spontaneously active in the absence of agonists.

    Experimental Procedures
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials. [35S]GTPgamma S (guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate) and [125I]iodomelatonin were purchased from NEN (Boston, MA). (-)N6-3[125I](iodo-4-hydroxyphenyl-isopropyl) adenosine was synthesized according to Linden (1984). Guanine nucleotides, adenosine deaminase, protein A, and protein G Sepharose were from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). 1-O-n-octyl-D-glucopyranoside (octylglucoside, OG), CHAPS (3-[3-cholaminpropyl) dimethyl-ammonio]-1-propane-sulfonic acid) and HEPES were purchased from Biomol (Munich, Germany); suramin was obtained from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA). The materials required for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were obtained from Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA). Fetal calf serum was purchased from PAA Laboratories (Linz, Austria), Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), nonessential amino acids, beta -mercaptoethanol, and G418 (geneticin) were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Melatonin and luzindole were purchased from Tocris (Langford, Bristol, UK). N6-cyclopentyladenosine, PTX, L-glutamine, penicillin G, and streptomycin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Buffers and salts were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies directed against peptides derived from the carboxy-terminal domains of the alpha  subunits of Gi(1-3) and Gq/11 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies directed against epitopes in the amino terminus and carboxy terminus of Galpha o as well as a Gi-selective antiserum were a generous gift from Dr. G. Milligan, University of Glasgow (Glasgow, UK). Antiserum-536 directed against the extreme C terminus of the human Mel1a receptor peptide was produced as will be described in L.B., F.R., L. Petit, P. de Coppet, M. Tissot, P. Barrett, P. J. Morgan, C.N., A.D.S., and R.J. (submitted for publication).

Stable Cell Lines. Cloning of the human melatonin type 1a (Mel1a) receptor cDNA using polymerase chain reaction primers selected from the reported Mel1a receptor sequence and generation of stable cell lines expressing the Mel1a receptor will be described in detail elsewhere. In brief, human brain mRNA was obtained through polymerase chain reaction amplification, the coding sequence was cloned into the expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and confirmed by DNA sequencing. For stable receptor expression, HEK293 cells were transfected with the human Mel1a receptor cDNA together with a plasmid carrying the geneticin resistance gene by liposome-mediated transfection. Clones were selected in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 800 µg/ml of geneticin (G418) and screened for [125I]iodomelatonin binding. For the generation of HEK293 cells expressing the human A1-adenosine receptor see Waldhoer et al. (1998). Transfected HEK293 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, beta -mercaptoethanol, nonessential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 0.2 mg/ml geneticin at 5% CO2 and 37°C.

Membrane Preparation and Protein Purification. Cells were grown to confluence in 10-cm tissue culture dishes, rinsed once with ice-cold PBS, and scraped off their plastic support. After sedimentation, the cell pellet was resuspended in HME (25 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EDTA) and subsequently deep frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were thawed and disrupted by sonication. Membranes were sedimented by centrifugation at 38,000g for 10 min, were resuspended in HME at a protein concentration of 8 to 10 mg/ml and stored in aliquots at -80°C. For experiments in which contaminating nuclear matter had to be discarded, membranes were enriched by differential centrifugation; the supernatant obtained by centrifuging the homogenate at 9,000g, was sedimented at 50,000g.

Recombinant Galpha i-1 and rGalpha i-3 were produced in Escherichia coli and purified from bacterial lysates as described in Mumby and Linder (1994). G protein oligomers were purified from porcine brain and free beta gamma dimers were chromatographically resolved from the alpha  subunits as in Casey et al. (1989) with minor modifications; cholic acid was replaced by the zwitterionic detergent CHAPS and phenylsepharose was used instead of the heptylamine matrix for hydrophobic interaction chromatography (Nanoff et al., 1997).

Radioligand Binding Experiments. Equilibrium binding with [125I]iodomelatonin was carried out in a final volume of 25 to 100 µl containing: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 5 to 10 µg membrane protein. The binding reaction was carried out for 60 min at 30°C and terminated by filtration over glass fiber filters using a cell harvester (Skatron, Lier, Norway). [125I]Iodomelatonin binding to intact cells was carried out on cells that were detached from their growth support and resuspended in assay tubes. The binding reaction proceeded in DMEM for 90 min at 30°C. Specific [125I]iodomelatonin binding was not detectable on nontransfected HEK293 cells and on HEK293 cells transfected with the A1-adenosine receptor. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 100 µM luzindole and typically amounted to less than 10% of total binding.

Mel1a receptor-promoted G protein activation was determined by measuring the association rate of [35S]GTPgamma S to Mel1a receptor-expressing membranes. To suppress the spontaneous guanine nucleotide exchange, the following assay conditions were chosen. Membranes (~10 µg) were suspended in an assay volume of 30 µl buffer containing: 25 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 1.0 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.01 mM GDP. Following a preincubation of membranes in the presence or absence of receptor ligand (melatonin at 100 nM, luzindole at 100 µM) for 10 min at 25°C, the assay was initiated by adding [35S]GTPgamma S to yield a final concentration of ~3 nM (specific activity = 2400 cpm/fmol). After the indicated reaction times, 0.9 ml of ice-cold stop buffer containing: 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM GTP was added. Bound and free radioactivity were separated by filtration over glass fiber filters.

Uncoupling of Mel1a Receptor by G Protein-Selective Antibodies and Suramin. Membranes were prepared from HEK293 cells that had or had not been pretreated with PTX (16 h, 0.1 µg/ml), and from cells that were transfected with a Galpha q cDNA in a pCIS plasmid (kindly provided by Dr. M. Simon, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA) that drives the overexpression of Galpha q. Membranes (~10 µg protein/assay or ~25 µg protein/assay if the membranes had been prepared from PTX-treated cells) were preincubated with the indicated amounts of antibody in the presence of 0.2% OG in a volume of 20 µl for 20 min on ice. The binding reaction was started by adding [125I]iodomelatonin (300 pM) to give a final OG concentration of <0.05% and was terminated as described above. The nonspecific effect of adding immune globulin was controlled for by performing the binding experiment in parallel with nonimmune IgG.

Inhibition of agonist radioligand binding through inhibition of R/G interaction by suramin was assessed as described in Waldhoer et al. (1998). To rule out that suramin (which virtually does not permeate into cells) interfered with ligand binding by combining with the binding pocket of the Mel1a receptor, we evaluated the effect of suramin on iodomelatonin binding to intact cells; 100 µM suramin did not affect the affinity for iodomelatonin or the number of labeled receptors. Inhibition of iodomelatonin binding to isolated membranes by suramin then was evaluated at various radioligand concentrations. The incubation volume varied between 25 and 200 µl (for high and low radioligand concentrations, respectively) comprising between 10 and 40 µg membrane protein; membranes were used from untreated cells with or without the addition of detergent (at 0.1% OG) or from PTX-treated cells. At each radioligand concentration, suramin inhibition curves were established. The binding data were fitted to a monophasic displacement curve using nonlinear regression; IC50 estimates were replotted versus the relative receptor occupancy obtained at each radioligand concentration (specific binding measured in the absence of suramin relative to the Bmax of the membrane preparation). An increase in the relative receptor occupancy increases the IC50 according to the equation: IC50 = Ki/KA × A + Ki where Ki denotes the dissociation constant of suramin binding to the G protein, A indicates the number of activated receptors in the membrane, and KA describes the coupling affinity of the active, agonist-liganded receptor for the G protein (Freissmuth et al., 1999).

Determination of cAMP Formation and Inositol Phosphates (IP) Accumulation in Intact Cells. HEK293 cells expressing the Mel1a receptor were grown to confluence in 40-mm culture dishes in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum. The cellular ATP pool was labeled by incubating the cells with 2.5 µCi/ml of [3H]adenine for 16 h. After removing free [3H]adenine and rinsing, cells were incubated with DMEM containing rolipram (10 µM) and the assay was started by adding receptor ligands in the absence or presence of forskolin (20 µM). The reaction was stopped after 10 min by aspirating the assay medium and adding 800 µl of 2% perchloric acid with 100 µM cAMP. After neutralizing the cell extract with 80 µl of 4 M KOH, [3H]cAMP was separated from ATP by sequential chromatography on Dowex AG 1X-4W and Alumina columns (Johnson and Solomon, 1991). To monitor the recovery of [3H]cAMP, an internal [32P]cAMP standard was prepared using recombinant adenylyl cyclase consisting of the two, separately expressed catalytic domains of the type I and type II isoforms (Mitterauer et al., 1998).

Cells were grown in 40-mm dishes and labeled for 16 h with [3H]inositol (2.5 µCi/ml) in medium low in inositol (medium 199; Life Technologies). After medium exchange, cells were preincubated with 10 mM LiCl for 10 min. The assay was initiated by adding receptor ligands and carried out for 20 min. After aspirating the assay medium, cells were lysed by adding trichloroacetic acid (TCA; 5%) and the supernatant was transferred to polypropylene tubes. TCA was removed with water saturated diethyl ether; the remaining sample was diluted in 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5 and applied to ion-exchange chromatography on 0.6 ml Dowex AG 1X-8 columns. Inositol, glycerophosphoinositol, and IP were separated as described previously (Nanoff et al., 1990); IP1, which accounted for more than ~90% of the radiolabeled IPs, was eluted using 0.18 M ammoniumformiate in 0.1 M formic acid.

Reconstitution of Mel1a Receptor with Purified Gi To probe the interaction of the Mel1a receptor with exogenous G protein of the Gi class, membranes were washed with 6 M urea. Two milligrams of membrane protein was taken up in 10 ml 6 M urea/50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), and after 15 min at 4°C the suspension was centrifuged at 50,000g. The resulting pellet was washed and resuspended in HME. In urea-washed membranes that were stripped off peripheral membrane proteins, ~80% of the iodomelatonin binding was lost. Interaction of the Mel1a receptor with Gi was tested by measuring iodomelatonin binding and the receptor catalyzed G protein activation. To restore high-affinity iodomelatonin binding, recombinant Galpha i-3 and purified porcine beta gamma -dimer at the indicated concentrations were preincubated with urea-washed membranes (~3 µg membrane protein) in the presence of 0.2% OG for 20 min on ice. The binding assay was initiated by adding radioligand and by diluting the preincubation mix about 4-fold. To determine G protein activation by [35S]GTPgamma S binding, preincubation of membranes with Gi-1 in the presence of 0.2% OG on ice was followed by adding receptor ligands in reaction buffer. Ligands were allowed to bind for 15 min at 25°C before the reaction was carried out as described above. To control for the loss of receptor due to urea treatment we also subjected membranes carrying the A1-adenosine receptor to urea treatment.

ADP ribosylation of alpha i (10 µg) was performed with preactivated PTX (50 ng, see below) and an equimolar amount of purified brain beta gamma as described by Carty (1994). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 1 h at 25°C in a volume of 5 µl including 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1% Lubrol (Boehringer-Ingelheim, Heidelberg, Germany), 10 mM thymidine, 10 µM GDP, 0.4 mg N-(2-chloropropyl)-N,N-dimethyl-ammoniumchloride, and 0.1 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). The reaction was followed by sequential dilution with HME plus 8 mM CHAPS and by concentration over a YM 30 membrane (Amicon, Beverly, MA), resulting in a 100-fold dilution of the reaction buffer ingredients. To control for protein loss, an equal amount of alpha i was processed in the same manner without PTX (sham treatment). Urea-washed membranes (10 µg) were reconstituted with a final concentration of ~0.1 µM PTX- or sham-treated alpha i, and binding of [125I]iodomelatonin (300 pM) was performed at a final concentration of 1 mM CHAPS.

[32P]ADP Ribosylation of Gi and subsequent Immunoprecipitation Using a Galpha i-Selective Antibody. Membranes (2 mg membrane protein) from native and PTX-pretreated HEK293 cells were solubilized with 10 mM CHAPS in Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH 8.0, and EDTA 1 mM (protein/detergent ratio = 1:4) by stirring on ice for 1 h. The soluble supernatant was collected by centrifugation (75,000g for 15 min) and the volume was reduced over a YM 30 membrane (Amicon) to a protein concentration of ~2.0 mg/ml. PTX was dissolved in preactivation buffer (100 mM DTT, 0.8 M urea, 5 mM CHAPS, and 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0) and was activated for 25 min at 30°C. One milligram of the soluble membrane extract was subjected to ADP ribosylation by preactivated PTX (5 µg). The reaction was carried out for 1 h at 25°C in a volume of 0.8 ml including 37.5 mM Tris-HCl, 45 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 10 µM GDP, 0.4 mg N-(2-chloropropyl)-N,N-dimethyl-ammoniumcholoride, 10 mM thymidine, 0.1 mM NAD, and 450 nCi [32P]NAD at a specific activity 5.6 pCi/nmol. Proteins were precipitated by adding TCA to a concentration of 10%. The protein pellet was rinsed with acetone, dried under a stream of nitrogen, and resuspended in 250 µl RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 1% Nonidet P-40, 5 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl). The resuspended protein pellet was incubated with 2.5 µg of an antibody directed against the carboxy terminus of Galpha i1-3 for 6 h at 4°C. Antibodies were precipitated by the addition of a 1:1 mixture of protein A/protein G-Sepharose (10% of the final volume) for 2 h at 4°C. After centrifugation, the Sepharose was washed four times with RIPA at 0.15% Nonidet P-40. Bound proteins were dissolved by boiling in 60 µl SDS-sample buffer and the entire volume was subjected to gel electrophoresis.

Immunoprecipitation of Mel1a Receptor. HEK293 membranes expressing the Mel1a receptor were solubilized using 1% digitonin in 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 12 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM EDTA and protease inhibitors (5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 mg/ml leupeptin, and 10 mg/ml benzamidine). The detergent/protein ratio was 1:1; the mixture was stirred for 3 h at 4°C and centrifuged at 50,000g. For immune precipitation, the digitonin concentration was adjusted to 0.2% and antiserum-536 was added so that the serum made up 1/40 of the reaction volume. Immune complex formation was allowed to proceed for 18 h at 4°C with gentle agitation and during the last 6 h protein A-agarose (10%) was included. The agarose beads were sedimented by centrifugation at 5000g and washed five times with ice-cold buffer including 0.2% digitonin. Bound proteins were resuspended in 0.2% digitonin buffer and incubated with 50 µM guanosine-5'-(beta ,gamma -imido)triphosphate [Gpp(NH)p] for 1 h at 37°C. The supernatant was added to SDS-sample buffer, boiled, and separated by gel electrophoresis.

Immunoblots. Membrane proteins (25 µg/lane) were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (12% acrylamide and 0.16% bisacrylamide) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes that were probed with antisera recognizing Galpha i or a purified antibody recognizing Galpha q (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The immunostained bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using an anti-rabbit-IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

High-Affinity [125I]Iodomelatonin Binding to Mel1a Receptor on Intact Cells. When the human Mel1a receptor was stably expressed in HEK293 cells and intact cells were subjected to equilibrium binding, the agonist radioligand iodomelatonin bound in a saturable manner and with high affinity (Fig. 1A); in nontransfected cells no specific binding (or cellular uptake) of iodomelatonin was detected. In membranes prepared from Mel1a receptor-expressing cells (Mel1a membranes), iodomelatonin bound with similar affinity (Fig. 1B). The total number of Mel1a receptors detected on the surface of intact cells was about twice the number of receptors retained in isolated membranes. This is presumably due to losses during membrane preparation; furthermore, the data show that the density of receptors in the high-affinity conformation on intact cells was not less than their density in membranes. In addition, Fig. 1A depicts a saturation isotherm obtained on intact cells and in the presence of suramin (0.3 mM); suramin acts as a G protein antagonist (see Freissmuth et al., 1999), but because of its six negative charges, it is virtually membrane impermeable. Iodomelatonin binding to intact cells was not affected by suramin, indicating that the compound did not block the ligand binding site of the Mel1a receptor. Thus, suramin could be used to inhibit R/G coupling in cell membrane preparations (see below; Fig. 2).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Iodomelatonin binding to isolated membranes from HEK293 cells stably expressing the Mel1a receptor and binding to intact cells. A, iodomelatonin binding was performed to intact cells in suspension in DMEM in the absence () and presence (black-square) of 0.3 mM suramin for 1 h at 25°C. The KD value was estimated to be 89 ± 11 pM (n = 3). B, specific iodomelatonin binding to membranes from control () and PTX-treated (black-square) cells. Bmax and KD estimates were 732 ± 38 fmol/mg and 56 ± 9 pM for untreated and 526 ± 112 fmol/mg and 93 ± 17 pM for PTX-treated cells (n = 5).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Destabilization of iodomelatonin binding to the Mel1a receptor by guanine nucleotides and by the G protein antagonist suramin. A, binding of iodomelatonin (300 pM) to Mel1a membranes was carried out at 30°C for 60 min in the presence of GTPgamma S at the indicated concentrations with (black-square) or without () the addition of detergent (OG, 0.1%). B, inhibition of iodomelatonin binding to the Mel1a receptor by increasing concentrations of suramin was evaluated at various degrees of receptor occupancy (75 and 99%) attained at different iodomelatonin concentrations (open circle , , 100 pM; black-square, , 500 pM). Binding data were obtained in the presence (open symbols) or absence (closed symbols) of 0.1% OG and are given in percentage of the binding in the absence of suramin. IC50 values were estimated by nonlinear curve fitting. C, IC50 estimates were obtained from individual suramin concentration-response curves as in B and were replotted versus the relative receptor occupancy. Curves were generated in native membranes (), in native membranes resuspended in 0.1% OG (black-square) and in PTX-treated membranes (black-triangle). Membranes were labeled with different concentrations of iodomelatonin (range, ~50-700 pM) in the presence of increasing concentrations of suramin, and from the inhibition curve, IC50 values were estimated.

Because the Mel1a receptor is known to transduce signals via G proteins of the Gi/o class, we incubated cells with PTX; membranes derived from PTX-treated cells still displayed high- affinity binding and the number of receptors amounted to about two thirds of that determined in untreated cells (Fig. 1B). These findings do not fit the widely accepted model of how receptors and G proteins interact; the high-affinity conformation of the receptor is thought to be transient in the presence of guanine nucleotides, and PTX typically eliminates the ability of Gi-coupled receptors to bind an agonist with high affinity. Thus, on intact cells and in PTX-treated membranes, iodomelatonin binding is not expected to occur.

Affinity of Mel1a Receptor for Its G Protein. It is, alternatively, conceivable that the uncoupled, G protein-free form of the receptor can per se bind iodomelatonin with high affinity. Therefore, we probed the R/G interaction. Guanine nucleotide-dependent modulation of agonist binding is a sensitive index for functional R/G coupling. In membranes, guanine nucleotides apparently failed to destabilize iodomelatonin binding. However, the inclusion of detergent in the binding assay unmasked the effect of guanine nucleotides (Fig. 2A). In the presence of detergent (at "lubricant" concentrations below the critical micellar concentration <=  4 mM CHAPS or 0.1% OG), about 60% of the receptor population was destabilized by guanine nucleotides; GTPgamma S and GTP were as potent and effective as GDP in inhibiting the formation of the high-affinity complex (data not shown). The presence of low detergent concentrations did not significantly affect iodomelatonin binding affinity nor the number of labeled receptors; at higher detergent concentrations the binding was almost completely suppressed by guanine nucleotides, but the number of labeled receptors decreased (not shown). Similarly, in membranes from PTX-treated cells, guanine nucleotides suppressed iodomelatonin binding if detergent was present at low concentrations (data not shown).

The G protein antagonist suramin has been employed as an alternative to guanine nucleotides to uncouple R/G complexes in isolated membranes. Suramin blocks binding of the activated receptor to the G protein interface and has been demonstrated to be very effective in uncoupling Gi-coupled receptors (Beindl et al., 1996; Waldhoer et al. 1998). Figure 2B shows that suramin inhibited iodomelatonin binding in a dose-dependent fashion but the concentrations required (IC50 >10 µM) were higher when compared with those necessary for uncoupling the D2-dopamine receptor, another Gi-coupled receptor (IC50 ~0.2 µM; Waldhoer et al., 1998). The low potency of suramin suggested that the activated receptor had a high affinity for Gi. The affinity of the Mel1a receptor for the G protein in the membranes can be estimated by determining the potency of suramin at different levels of receptor occupancy (Fig. 2B). The inhibition curves shifted to higher values as the iodomelatonin concentration increased. This was not due to suramin interfering with the ligand binding site on the receptor, because suramin did not reduce iodomelatonin binding to intact cells (see Fig. 1A); rather, the shift in suramin dose-response relationships was caused by an increase in receptor occupancy, because the concentration of active receptor in the membrane antagonized the effect of suramin. Figure 2C illustrates that the relationship between receptor occupancy and the suramin IC50 value is linear (within the range of experimental error). In this plot, the slope of the regression line allows an estimate of the coupling affinity as discussed in detail elsewhere (Freissmuth et al., 1999). The affinity estimate derived for the Mel1a receptor was about 10 nM, thus it was in the same range as that observed for the human A1-adenosine receptor (Waldhoer et al., 1998). If detergent was included, uncoupling by suramin occurred at lower concentrations and the slope became smaller (Fig. 2C). This confirmed that the stability of the ternary complex of the Mel1a receptor is high and that the addition of detergent reduces the stability. When PTX- treated membranes were used, suramin inhibited iodomelatonin binding with higher potency than in untreated membranes; this gave a smaller slope of the suramin-regression line (Fig. 2C). The apparent potency of suramin depends on the concentration of the reaction partners that form the ternary complex, i.e., agonist, activated receptor, and G protein heterotrimer (see Freissmuth et al., 1999). The increased potency of suramin in PTX-treated membranes can therefore be accounted for by the drastic decrease in the number of available G protein moieties, which becomes limiting to the rate of complex formation, hence to complex stability. An alternative explanation is that the Mel1a receptor may also combine, albeit with lower affinity, with PTX-resistant G protein subtypes and that this interaction is also inhibited by suramin.

Signaling via Mel1a Receptor Is PTX Sensitive. The ability of guanine nucleotides and of suramin to decrease iodomelatonin binding indicated that high-affinity agonist binding was indeed due to the formation of a ternary complex with the Mel1a receptor; this ability was retained in membranes pretreated with PTX. We therefore tested whether the Mel1a receptor would interact with G protein subtypes other than Gi. Figure 3A demonstrates that melatonin accelerated the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction (association of [35S]GTPgamma S) in isolated Mel1a-membranes, and that addition of detergent enhanced the receptor-dependent association rate (Fig. 3A). PTX abolished agonist-induced G protein activation. To detect a receptor-mediated increase in G protein activation, PTX-treated membranes had to be reconstituted with Gi (not shown).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   G protein activation and effector regulation by the Mel1a receptor stably expressed in HEK293 cells. A, G protein activation in Mel1a membranes before (circles and squares) and after PTX treatment (triangles). The [35S]GTPgamma S association rate was assessed in the presence (open symbols) and absence (full symbols) of 0.1 µM melatonin; y-axis values were obtained by normalizing GTPgamma S binding data to the Bmax values from iodomelatonin saturation isotherms in PTX-treated and untreated membranes. In native membranes [35S]GTPgamma S binding was determined with (black-square) and without () the addition of 0.1% OG; the inset shows the agonist promoted increment in [35S]GTPgamma S binding over basal. The experiment shown is representative of three performed. B, [3H]cAMP accumulation was measured in native and PTX-treated cells incubated with rolipram in the presence of the indicated agents (forsk, forskolin 10 µM; mel, melatonin 0.1 µM) for 10 min. [3H]cAMP accumulation is expressed as percentage of basal accumulation, which amounted to 1300 ± 176 cpm. C, accumulation of [3H]IP1 was determined in the presence of LiCl (10 mM) in native and PTX-treated cells; the indicated substances (melatonin 0.1 µM, ATP 30 µM) were added for 30 min. [3H]IP1 accumulation is given in percentage of basal [3H]IP1 accumulation in untreated cells (923 ± 239 cpm). In B and C data are means ± S.E. of at least five individual experiments.

In intact cells, PTX reduced the melatonin-dependent regulation of second messenger production. Figure 3B shows that melatonin (100 nM) largely inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation and that in unstimulated cells melatonin induced a modest increase in cAMP formation. The latter effect may be due to beta gamma -mediated activation of type II/IV adenylyl cyclase, which can occur even in the absence of activated Galpha s (Zimmermann and Taussig, 1996). Melatonin also increased the accumulation of IPs if phospholipase C was coactivated via the P2Y receptor endogenously expressed in HEK293 cells (Schachter et al., 1997). All these actions of melatonin were eliminated after treating the cells with PTX. This effect is consistent with coupling of the Mel1a receptor to Gi but goes against the alternative hypothesis that the Mel1a receptor couples to PTX-resistant members of the Gq/11 or of the Gi/o family (Gz), as has been suggested (Yung et al., 1995).

Specificity of G Protein Subtypes Forming a Ternary Complex with Mel1a Receptor. We then tested whether the Mel1a receptor engages exclusively Gi when it binds agonists with high affinity and whether it does so even after PTX treatment. We used antibodies selective for the carboxy termini of G protein alpha  subunits to destabilize high-affinity iodomelatonin binding in membranes from untreated and PTX-treated cells (Fig. 4, A and B). The carboxy terminus of the alpha  subunit is a site contacted by the receptor and is, in part, responsible for the selective recognition of G proteins by individual receptors (Conklin et al., 1996). The antibodies employed were directed against the carboxy terminal dekapeptides of alpha i1-3, alpha q, and alpha o. Uncoupling of the Mel1a receptor required that the antibody be preincubated with membranes in the presence of detergent; if the antibody was added in the absence of detergent a specific inhibitory effect on iodomelatonin binding was not found (data not shown). This observation is consistent with the interpretation that the interaction between receptor and G protein is tight. Figure 4, A and B show the concentration-dependent decrease in iodomelatonin binding by the antibody selective for the carboxy terminus Galpha i (1-3), which inhibited agonist binding with equivalent potency and efficacy in native and in PTX-treated membranes; the effects of other antibodies were not significant except for the Galpha q antibody if applied to membranes prepared from cells over-expressing Galpha q (~5- to 10-fold higher alpha q level than in vector-transfected controls; not shown); here, the Galpha q-selective antibody was as effective as the Galpha i-antibody in reducing iodomelatonin binding. Whereas overexpression of alpha q led to the interaction of Gq with the Mel1a receptor, it did not cause an increment in the number of receptors labeled by iodomelatonin. This suggests that there are no spare receptors but that all of the receptors on the cell surface are capable of recruiting G proteins.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Uncoupling of the Mel1a receptor by G protein alpha  subunit-specific antibodies. Membranes were prepared from HEK293 cells stably expressing the Mel1a receptor before (A) and after (B) PTX treatment, and after transient transfection with the cDNA encoding for the alpha  subunit of Gq (C). Membranes were preincubated with the indicated amounts of antibodies raised against the C terminus of Galpha i1-3 (), Galpha o (black-square), and Galpha q/11 (black-triangle). Binding is expressed in percentage of the binding observed when instead of the specific antibodies, nonimmune IgG was included in the assay at the same amount. After a preincubation of membranes with the antibody in the presence of 0.2% OG for 15 min on ice, the binding reaction was performed at 30°C for 1 h at a final detergent concentration of less than 0.05%. Mean values ± S.E. are given from three to five binding experiments.

Precoupling of Unliganded Receptor. Although the Mel1a receptor can interact with other G protein subtypes like Gq, this coupling is of minor importance in the formation of a high-affinity ternary complex, because the bulk of ternary complexes is sensitive to disruption by the alpha i-selective antibody both in control membranes and in membranes prepared from PTX-treated cells. This finding favors the interpretation that the Mel1a receptor coupled to ADP-ribosylated Gi; however, this is rather unlikely. The alternative interpretation is based on previous observations that indicated that the interaction of an activated receptor with a G protein of the Gi/o class renders the alpha  subunit unavailable to modification by PTX (Tsai et al., 1984). If the unliganded Mel1a receptor was spontaneously active, this would result in precoupling of the receptor to Gi (in the absence of a receptor agonist) and hence give rise to a sustained Mel1a R/G complex in which Gi is unavailable to PTX-mediated ADP ribosylation.

To search for evidence for constitutive activity of the Mel1a receptor, we first assessed the effect of the receptor antagonist luzindole on cAMP accumulation in Mel1a receptor-expressing HEK293 cells. In the presence of forskolin, luzindole increased cAMP levels by 50% (from 4944 ± 1490 to 6786 ± 1950 cpm, means ± S.D., n = 3 and p < .05 by paired Student's t test) during a 20-min accumulation period. In control cells that were not transfected with the Mel1a receptor, luzindole had no effect on basal or forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. The luzindole effect might have resulted from displacing prebound melatonin or from restraining the constitutive activity of the Mel1a receptor. Therefore, plasma membranes were prepared and washed thoroughly and the effect of luzindole was assessed on the basal association rate of GTPgamma S. Luzindole inhibited GTPgamma S binding to Mel1a membranes (but not in control membranes), indicating that G protein activation is driven by the unoccupied Mel1a receptor (Fig. 5A).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Constitutive activity of the Mel1a receptor in membranes of HEK293 cells. A, time course of [35S]GTPgamma S binding to Mel1a membranes in the absence () and presence (open circle ) of the Mel1a receptor antagonist luzindole (100 µM). The binding assay was performed at 0.175% OG in the presence of 0.3 µM GDP for the indicated intervals at 25°C. B, [35S]GTPgamma S binding to urea-washed Mel1a membranes after reconstitution with increasing concentrations of Gi-1. [35S]GTPgamma S binding was determined in the absence (black-square) and presence () of melatonin (0.1 µM) and in membranes that had been heat inactivated (black-triangle). The binding assay was initiated after preincubation of the membranes with Gi-1 plus 0.2% OG. C, time course of [35S]GTPgamma S binding on reconstitution of Gi-1 with urea-washed Mel1a membranes that had been (black-square) or had not been (black-triangle) heat inactivated. Each figure shows a typical experiment of three performed.

Constitutive activity was also demonstrated by reconstituting purified Gi with the Mel1a receptor in membranes that had been stripped off peripheral membrane proteins (including heterotrimeric G proteins) by repeated washes in urea. Addition of increasing amounts of Gi-1 to urea stripped membranes increased binding of [35S]GTPgamma S (Fig. 5B). Both in the absence and presence of melatonin dose-response curves for Gi-1 were not linear but hyperbolic and saturable. The apparent affinity of Gi-1 for the unoccupied Mel1a receptor was estimated to be ~50 nM and the affinity did not increase in the presence of melatonin. A linear relationship between the amount of Gi-1 added and the binding of GTPgamma S was observed only after the urea-stripped membranes had first been denatured at 80°C. Accordingly, the time course shown in Fig. 5C revealed that the association rate for binding of GTPgamma S was accelerated in urea-stripped membranes when compared with boiled membranes. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the Mel1a receptor is spontaneously active.

Mel1a Receptor Forms a Stable R/G Complex. Because the Mel1a receptor displayed basal activity, we conjectured that the resistance of iodomelatonin binding to PTX resulted from the formation of a tightly associated complex of the unoccupied Mel1a receptor with Gi. Direct evidence to prove this hypothesis was obtained by two experimental approaches.

First, the R/G association was explored with an antiserum (antiserum-536) raised against a peptide corresponding to the 19 C-terminal amino acids of the human Mel1a receptor; the antiserum-536 immunoprecipitates the Mel1a receptor from digitonin-solubilized membrane extracts (L.B., F.R., L. Petit, P. de Coppet, M. Tissot, P. Barrett, P. J. Morgan, C.N., A.D.S., and R.J., submitted for publication). For immunoprecipitation experiments membranes were prepared from naive cells or cells pretreated with PTX; the membranes were incubated with or without melatonin (100 nM) and solubilized with digitonin. The soluble extracts were incubated with antiserum-536 (dilution 1/40) and sedimented with protein A-agarose. G proteins that had been dissociated from immune complexes by treatment with Gpp(NH)p were resolved on an SDS gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and the blots were developed with a Gi-selective antiserum. Figure 6 shows that antiserum-536 indeed coprecipitated Gi; preincubation with melatonin markedly increased the yield of Gi, indicating that the agonist ligand stabilizes the complex and that the coprecipitation reflects the result of a specific R/G interaction. Similarly, if membranes from Galpha q-transfected cells were employed, alpha q was recovered from receptor precipitates, consistent with interpretation that the receptor can also bind to Gq (data not shown). Figure 6 also shows that immunoprecipitates from PTX-treated membranes also contained Galpha i. The result was similar to that in untreated membranes, except that the yield was smaller; even after PTX, melatonin increased the amount of precipitated Gi , although the agonist-induced increment was less than in the controls. This experiment indicates that the Mel1a receptor has the ability to combine with Gi in the absence of an agonist, and that the spontaneous association is preserved on PTX exposure. This association is tight enough to be retained after detergent solubilization, although the addition of detergents lowers the affinity of the interaction (see Fig. 2). Conversely, it is not unexpected that the addition of the agonist stabilizes the R/G complex and thereby increases the yield of coimmunoprecipitated Galpha i.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Recovery of Galpha i by immunoprecipitation of the Mel1a receptor. Membranes from native and PTX-treated HEK293 cells expressing the Mel1a receptor were incubated with or without melatonin (0.1 µM) for 1 h at 25°C. After solubilization with 1% digitonin, extracts were subjected to immune precipitation using antiserum-536 and protein A-agarose; the precipitates were resuspended and G proteins were dissociated with Gpp(NH)p. The supernatants were subjected to gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted using an antiserum specific for Gi protein alpha  subunits. Membranes prepared from rat brain cortex (20 µg/lane) were applied as a source of G protein standards.

We confirmed this result by subjecting a soluble membrane extract to PTX-mediated "back ADP ribosylation" with radioactive substrate [alpha -32P]NAD. Cells were treated with PTX and soluble membrane extracts were prepared and re-exposed to PTX in the presence of [alpha -32P]NAD. After the reaction, Gi was immunoprecipitated, separated by gel electrophoresis, and exposed to X-ray film. The following controls were performed. First, A1-adenosine receptor-expressing cells were treated in an identical manner and detergent extracts were subjected to back ADP ribosylation with [alpha -32P]NAD. Second, membrane extracts from non-PTX-exposed Me11a- and A1-adenosine receptor-expressing cells were also subjected to in vitro ADP ribosylation. The results shown in Fig. 7A demonstrate that in the Mel1a cells a radioactive Gi band was detected after the cells had been pretreated with PTX. This band was not present in PTX-treated cells expressing the A1-adenosine receptor. The radioactivity incorporated into the alpha i band is quite modest compared with precipitates from untreated controls. Matched amounts of membrane protein were applied to the in vitro ADP ribosylation procedure. We therefore obtained a semiquantitative estimate for the detected radioactivity as follows. The densities of the alpha i bands in lane 2 [Fig. 7, Mel1a, 1/50 representing the 50th part of the sample in lane 1 (Mel1a)] and lane 3 (from PTX-treated Mel1a cells (PTX)] were comparable. Because about 0.2% (or 50 pmol/mg) of the membrane-bound protein in the HEK293 cells we used is Gi (Waldhoer et al., 1998), the 50th part being ~1 pmol/mg, the amount of labeled Gi is roughly equivalent to the amount of receptor. To complement this finding, we tested the alternative hypothesis, namely that the Mel1a receptor coupled to Gi in the ADP-ribosylated form. To this end, purified Gi-3 was subjected to PTX treatment in vitro and, after buffer exchange, was reconstituted with urea-stripped membranes. Figure 7B shows that in urea-stripped membranes reconstitution of iodomelatonin binding with Gi-3 was saturable (KA ~ 40 nM) but only a few receptors were shifted into the high-affinity conformation. Figure 7C shows the result of reconstitution of urea-stripped Mel1a membranes and control membranes carrying the human A1-adenosine receptor with PTX- and sham-treated Gi-3 (~100 nM). The efficiency of reconstitution with Gi-3 was similar for the Mel1a and the A1-adenosine receptor. Neither the Mel1a nor the A1-adenosine receptor coupled to PTX-treated Gi-3.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   [32P]ADP ribosylation by PTX of G proteins extracted from HEK293 cell membranes. A, soluble extracts from native and PTX-treated HEK293 cells expressing either the human Mel1a or the A1-adenosine receptor were incubated with preactivated PTX using [32P]NAD as a substrate. From the soluble extracts (~1 mg protein), G proteins were quantitatively immunoprecipitated with a Galpha i-selective antibody and resolved by gel electrophoresis. Half of the immune precipitates, obtained from PTX-exposed (PTX+) or from nonexposed (PTX-) cells, were loaded onto the gel, except in the second lane, where only the 50th part of the sample to the left was applied. Shown is a representative autoradiography of three experiments performed. B, reconstitution of the Mel1a receptor with Gi-3. Iodomelatonin binding to urea-washed Mel1a membranes was performed after reconstitution with increasing amounts of rGalpha i-3 in the presence of a 4-fold molar excess of beta gamma -dimer purified from porcine brain. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results. C, reconstitution of the Mel1a and A1-adenosine receptor with PTX- and sham-treated Gi-3 (100 nM).

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The mode of G protein coupling of the Mel1a receptor is at variance with the predictions of the classical ternary complex model (Hepler and Gilman, 1992), because agonist high-affinity binding is stable in the presence of guanine nucleotides both in intact cells and in cell membranes. High-affinity binding of iodomelatonin to intact cells has previously been observed in various cell types, hence is not due to an artifact arising from clonal selection of a stable cell line (Witt-Enderby and Dubocovich, 1996). Even following pretreatment of HEK293 cells with PTX, which completely abolishes agonist high-affinity binding to typical Gi/o-coupled receptors, a major proportion of the Mel1a receptor population retains the ability to bind iodomelatonin with unaltered affinity. In the present work, we show that these unusual features arise from a highly stable association of the Mel1a receptor with Gi.

This conclusion is based on several findings. First, high-affinity agonist binding to the Mel1a receptor is strictly dependent on G protein coupling; uncoupling (by guanine nucleotides, suramin or G protein-directed antisera) results in a loss of high-affinity agonist binding. In membranes, guanine nucleotides destabilize this R/G complex only on the addition of detergent, which reduces the G protein affinity of the receptor (by about 20-fold at the detergent concentration employed) and enhances receptor-mediated G protein activation. Secondly, in HEK293 cells the Mel1a receptor interacts preferentially with Gi; this is true even after treatment with PTX, because an antiserum directed against the carboxy terminus of Galpha i eliminates high-affinity binding in membranes from PTX-treated cells. Thirdly, the receptor is spontaneously active, a property, which, by definition, gives rise to a precoupled state. In the precoupled state, the association of the unliganded receptor with Gi is also tight and this makes the cysteine residue in the alpha i C terminus unavailable to PTX-mediated ADP ribosylation. The formation of the complex between unliganded Mel1a receptor and Gi is governed by an affinity of 50 nM. This estimate represents the lower limit of the affinity because it was obtained in reconstitution experiments in the presence of detergent. Nevertheless, the complex between unliganded receptor and G protein is sufficiently stable such that it can be recovered by immunoprecipitation with an antiserum directed against the receptor.

There is an apparent discrepancy in the effects of PTX; whereas pretreatment with the toxin does not abolish high-affinity agonist binding, it completely suppresses agonist-promoted GTPgamma S binding and effector regulation. However, the sensitivity of agonist-promoted GTPgamma S binding is limited by the basal rate of ligand binding to the panoply of other GTP binding proteins that are present in cell membranes. This basal rate of binding is typically reduced by the addition of excess GDP. Under these assay conditions, agonist-promoted binding can, however, only be detected if the receptor acts catalytically (to activate several G proteins) or if the expression level of the receptor is very high. Pretreatment with PTX renders the bulk of Gi unavailable to the receptor leaving only stoichiometric amounts (which escape detection). More importantly, these observations also indicate that (unmodified) Gi has to be present in excess over the receptor to support efficient signaling from the Mel1a receptor to an effector (e.g., to adenylyl cyclase inhibition).

It has long been known that an activated receptor prevents ADP ribosylation of G protein alpha  subunits by PTX (Tsai et al., 1984). To the best of our knowledge, it has, however, not yet been documented that an unliganded receptor can effectively prevent access of PTX to Galpha i. The stoichiometric levels of unmodified Galpha i that persist after PTX treatment suffice to support high-affinity agonist binding to the Mel1a receptor. In contrast, an abundant pool of G proteins is indispensable for productive signaling of the receptor because regulation of adenylyl cyclase or phospholipase C is abolished by PTX treatment. We stress that the marked avidity with which the Mel1a receptor binds to Gi is not a consequence of a very high receptor expression level in HEK293 cells. First, the levels of Mel1a receptor in our HEK293 cell clone (~0.7 pmol/mg) is not substantially higher than that observed in membranes prepared from brain nuclei (~0.3 pmol/mg; Barrett et al., 1996) if the cellular heterogeneity in these preparations is taken into account. Secondly, a similar resistance of the Mel1a receptor to guanine nucleotide modulation has been observed in membranes prepared from various brain regions (Rivkees et al., 1989; Morgan et al., 1996), as well as in membranes from NIH3T3 cells expressing the cloned receptor (Nonno et al., 1998). Thirdly, we have previously examined the A1-adenosine and the D2-dopamine (Gi/o-coupled) receptors in HEK293 cells that were expressed to levels that were either lower or higher (between 0.2 and 4.0 pmol/mg) than that obtained with the Mel1a receptor cell clone. High-affinity agonist binding to these receptors was readily suppressed at low guanine nucleotide concentrations and was completely abolished by PTX (Waldhoer et al., 1998). Finally, even a fusion protein composed of the human A1-adenosine receptor and Galpha i in which the receptor is forced into close contact with the alpha  subunit does not reproduce the features of Mel1a receptor/G protein coupling (Waldhoer et al., 1999). We therefore conclude that the tight association of the Mel1a receptor and Galpha i is caused by intrinsic properties of the receptor and that it is independent of the expression level.

Several receptors endowed with constitutive activity (e.g., the alpha 2-adrenergic receptor, the 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptor, and a mutated form of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor) form ternary complexes that display limited sensitivity to guanine nucleotides (Neubig et al., 1988; Jagadeesh et al.,1990; Westphal and Sanders-Bush, 1994, Kjelsberg et al., 1992) However, a guanine nucleotide-resistant ternary complex does not necessarily result in constitutive activity of the receptor. In the avian beta -adrenergic receptor, for example, a stretch of the extended carboxy terminus confers guanine nucleotide resistance and restrains the spontaneous activity of the receptor; a truncated form of this receptor is constitutively active and becomes sensitive to guanine nucleotide modulation (Hertel et al., 1990; Parker and Ross, 1991). Similarly, guanine nucleotide modulation of the brain A2A-adenosine receptor is restored by partial proteolysis of the receptor protein (Nanoff et al., 1991). Like these receptors, the Mel1a receptor possesses an extended carboxy terminus; based on this analogy, it is attractive to speculate that the carboxy terminus is the candidate domain mediating the high stability of the R/G complex.

The level of Mel1a receptor stably expressed in HEK293 cells is reasonably similar to the density that is expected to occur in individual hypothalamic nerve cells; hence, it is highly probable that the constitutive activity of the receptor is physiologically relevant because the neuronal activity will vary with the fluctuations in the receptor level, independently of the ambient melatonin concentration. Because the receptor expression follows a circadian rhythm (Tenn and Niles, 1993; Neu and Niles, 1997), the effect of melatonin receptor ligands in adjusting the internal clock will be different with the time of the day; in rodents, for example, melatonin or melatonin agonists advance the phase of the circadian clock only when administered during a time window preceding the onset of locomotor activity (Van Reeth et al., 1997). Based on our observations, we postulate that melatonin antagonists rather than agonists will alter the circadian rhythm at other time points, e.g., at noon, when the Mel1a receptor density in target cells increases, and during the night, when the hormone levels rise. We also propose that inverse agonists will be effective in adjusting the circadian clock because they not only block the actions of melatonin but also eliminate signaling resulting from the spontaneous receptor activity.

    Acknowledgments

We appreciate the expert technical assistance of Anton Karel.

    Footnotes

Received April 28, 1999; Accepted August 11, 1999

This work was supported by grants from the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) to C.N. (P-12125) and to M.F. (P-12079), by a grant from the Institut de Recherches Internationales de Servier, and by the European Union-sponsored concerted action European Network for Biological Signal Transduction.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Christian Nanoff, Institute of Pharmacology, Vienna University, Wahringer Str. 13A, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: christian.nanoff{at}univie.ac.at

    Abbreviations

PTX, pertussis toxin; OG, octylglucoside; iodomelatonin, 2-[125I]iodomelatonin; HEK, human embryonic kidney; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; PCA, perchloroacetic acid; IP, inositol phosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; R/G, receptor/G protein.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References