MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellett, E.
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kellett, E.
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, G.

Vol. 56, Issue 4, 684-692, October 1999


Regulation of G Protein Activation and Effector Modulation by Fusion Proteins between the Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A Receptor and the alpha  Subunit of Gi1alpha : Differences in Receptor-Constitutive Activity Imparted by Single Amino Acid Substitutions in Gi1alpha

Elaine Kellett, I. Craig Carr, and Graeme Milligan

Molecular Pharmacology Group, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

    Summary
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Fusion proteins were generated between the human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor and both wild-type (Cys351) and pertussis toxin-resistant (Gly351 and Ile351) forms of Gi1. These were expressed stably. Pertussis toxin treatment substantially reduced basal high-affinity GTPase activity in clones expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha construct but not in clones expressing 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)Gi1alpha or (Ile351)Gi1alpha . Spiperone functioned as an inverse agonist in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein and in those expressing 5-HT1A receptor (Ile351)Gi1alpha but not the 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein. The effect of spiperone at the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha construct but not the 5-HT1A receptor (Ile351)Gi1alpha construct was blocked by pertussis toxin treatment. By contrast, agonists functioned with equal effectiveness at the three fusion proteins and were unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of the (Ile351)Gi1alpha - and (Gly351)Gi1alpha -containing constructs. 5-HT resulted in strong inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase in intact cells expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor. In fusion protein-expressing cells, 5-HT-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was also observed. Pertussis toxin treatment obliterated 5-HT-mediated inhibition in cells expressing the isolated receptor and the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein but not in those expressing the 5-HT1A receptor (Ile351) or (Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion proteins. These studies demonstrate that alteration of a single amino acid in Gi1alpha located at a key contact site between the G protein and a G protein-coupled receptor can regulate agonist-independent constitutive activity of the G protein-coupled receptor and that fusion proteins can directly regulate adenylyl cyclase.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) mediates a wide range of physiological actions via activation of a large family of receptors. With the exception of the 5-HT3 receptor, which is an intrinsic cation channel, all of the receptors for 5-HT are members of the superfamily of seven transmembrane element, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A highly studied member of this family is the 5-HT1A receptor, which is expressed both presynaptically on serotinergic nerve bodies, where it functions as an autoreceptor to dampen neuronal activity, and postsynaptically in many locations in the central nervous system to which serotinergic neurones project. Signal transduction from this GPCR is mediated predominantly via activation of members of the pertussis toxin-sensitive family of Gi-like G proteins and involves inhibitory regulation of adenylyl cyclase as well as modulation of the activity of a series of ion channels (Julius, 1998). Considerable interest has been accorded pharmacological studies indicating a likely role for this GPCR in the regulation of anxiety states, and the recent production of mice lacking expression of this GPCR has confirmed these ideas (Heisler et al., 1998; Ramboz et al., 1998).

In a series of studies designed to address details of the interactions of GPCRs and G proteins, we have recently constructed a number of fusion proteins in which the N terminus of a G protein alpha  subunit was linked directly to the C-terminal tail of a GPCR (Wise and Milligan, 1997; Wise et al., 1997a,b, 1999). Some of the constructs we have examined in detail have utilized the alpha 2A adrenoceptor (Wise and Milligan, 1997; Wise et al. 1997a,b). This GPCR is well established to function predominantly via members of the Gi family of G proteins. After stable expression of an alpha 2A adrenoceptor-Gi1alpha fusion protein in which the G protein was altered by conversion of cysteine351 to glycine to render it insensitive to the actions of pertussis toxin, we noted that although inhibition of adenylyl cyclase could be produced by alpha 2A adrenoceptor agonists in untreated cells, this was abolished after pertussis toxin treatment and thus could not have been mediated via the G protein linked to the GPCR (Burt et al., 1998).

In the present study, we have generated fusion proteins between the human 5-HT1A receptor and both wild-type (Cys351) and pertussis toxin-insensitive (Gly351 and Ile351) forms of Gi1alpha . After stable expression of these constructs in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells, ligand-mediated modulation of their GTPase activity and regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity were examined. As point mutation of residue351 of Gi1alpha can alter both the maximal effectiveness of agonist ligands (Bahia et al., 1998; Carr et al., 1998) and the relative intrinsic activity of different agonists (Jackson et al., 1999) we wished to assess how agonist-independent, constitutive activity might be modified by mutation of this residue, which lies within a key GPCR-G protein contact domain. We note marked constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein and the 5-HT1A receptor (Ile351)-Gi1alpha fusion protein, but not the 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)-Gi1alpha fusion protein, which could be inhibited by the inverse agonist spiperone. Confirmation that the constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor (Ile351) Gi1alpha fusion protein was inherently derived from intramolecular interactions of the two elements of the fusion protein was provided by the inability of pertussis toxin treatment to prevent spiperone-mediated inhibition of GTPase activity at this construct. These studies provide the first demonstration that single amino acid alterations in a G protein can significantly alter agonist-independent constitutive activity of a GPCR. Furthermore, we also record clear agonist-induced inhibitory regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, which proceeds via the G protein of the fusion constructs.

    Experimental Procedures
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials. All materials for tissue culture were supplied by Life Technologies Inc. (Paisley, Strathclyde, UK). Both the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist [3H]4(2'-methoxy)-phenyl-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-fluorobenzamido]ethyl-piperazine (MPPF; 78.3 Ci/mmol) and [gamma -32P]GTP (30 Ci/mmol) were obtained from DuPont-NEN (Boston, MA). Cholera toxin and pertussis toxin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Oligonucleotides were purchased from Cruachem (Glasgow, Strathclyde, UK). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma and Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany).

Construction of Plasmids Encoding 5HT1A, 5HT1A-Gi1alpha Fusion Proteins. The human 5HT1A receptor clone in pSP64 (a gift from Glaxo-Wellcome, Stevenage, UK) was digested with XbaI/BamHI and the resulting 1.5-kb fragment ligated to pcDNA3. To obtain the open reading frame of 1.3 kb, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using the following primers to introduce a HindIII restriction site at the 5' end and to remove the stop codon and introduce a BamHI restriction site at the 3' end, respectively: 5'-CTGAAGCTTATGGATGTGCTCAGCCCTGGTC-3'; 5'-CTGGGA TCCCTGGCGGCAGAAGTTACACTTAATG-3' (restriction enzyme sites underlined). The PCR fragment was digested with HindIII and BamHI and ligated into pcDNA3 to make the plasmid p5HT. To link the Gi1alpha wild-type (Cys351) cDNA to the 5HT1A receptor sequence, PCR was carried out on Gi1alpha to produce compatible restriction sites. The oligonucleotides used to do this were 5'-CTGGGATCCGGCTGCACACTGAGCGCTGAG-3' at the 5' end and 5'-GAGAATTCTTAGAAAGAGACCACAGTC-3' for the 3' end. The plasmid p5HT was digested with BamHI/EcoRI as was the Gi1alpha PCR fragment and the two were ligated to give the plasmid p5HTGi1. To construct the 5HT1A-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion plasmid (Gly351)Gi1alpha in PBS was digested with SacII/EcoRI and the 730-bp fragment was used to replace the corresponding fragment in p5HTGi1. An equivalent strategy was used to produce 5HT1A-(Ile351)Gi1alpha . The constructs were then sequenced to verify the DNA sequence.

Cell Culture and Stable Expression. HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) newborn calf serum, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were seeded into 100-mm culture dishes and grown to 60 to 80% confluence (18-24 h) before transfection with 5 µg of appropriate cDNAs using N-[1-(2,3-dideoxyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium methyl sulphate reagent (Boehringer Mannheim). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were split 1:4 into 800 µg/ml G418 sulfate (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) containing medium. A 100-mm dish of untransfected HEK293 cells was also split into the same medium as a control dish. About 1 week later, after all the cells in the control dish had died, G418-resistant cells in the transfected dishes were picked and transferred into 24-well plates using autoclaved pipette tips. About 20 clones of each cDNA were picked and grown in 1 ml/well of G418 medium (400 µg/ml). Clones were amplified, membrane preparations made, and their binding of [3H]MPPF determined.

Preparation of Membranes. Plasma membrane-containing P2 particulate fractions were prepared from cell pastes that had been stored at -80°C after harvesting. Cell pellets were resuspended in TE buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)/0.1 mM EDTA], and rupture of the cells was achieved with 25 strokes of a hand-held Teflon-on-glass homogenizer. Unbroken cells and nuclei were removed by centrifugation at low speed (2000 rpm) in a refrigerated microcentrifuge. The supernatant fraction was then centrifuged at 75,000 rpm for 30 min in a Beckman Optima TLX Ultracentrifuge with a TLA100.2 rotor. The pellets were resuspended in TE buffer to a final protein concentration of 1 to 3 mg/ml and stored at -80°C until required.

[3H]MPPF Binding Studies. Binding assays were performed by adding 5 to 10 µg of membrane protein to an assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% ascorbic acid, 10 µM pargyline, pH 7.4) containing [3H]MPPF (0.25-20 nM). Nonspecific binding was determined in parallel in the presence of 100 µM 5-HT. Samples were incubated at 30°C for 40 min and then terminated by rapid filtration through GF/C filters. The filters were washed 3 times with 5 ml of ice-cold wash buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% ascorbic acid, pH 7.4) and then counted.

High-Affinity GTPase Assays. The assays were performed as described by McKenzie and Milligan (1990) with modifications as described by Wise et al. (1997a,b) to allow measurement of Vmax in a number of cases. In such studies concentrations of GTP used as substrate ranged from 22 nM to 2 µM.

Intact Cell Adenylyl Cyclase Assays. Intact cell adenylyl cyclase assays were performed essentially as described by Wong (1994) and Merkouris et al. (1997). Cells were split into wells of a 24-well plate and incubated in medium containing [3H]adenine at 0.5 µCi/well for 16 to 24 h. The generation of [3H]cAMP in response to ligands was then assessed in the presence of the nonselective cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine (1 mM).

Miscellaneous. All experiments were performed on a minimum of three occasions using cells or membrane preparations derived from different cell passages. Where appropriate data are presented as means ± S.E.M.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

PCR was used to amplify a cDNA encoding the human 5-HT1A receptor and in the process both remove the stop codon and introduce a BamHI restriction site in this region. This amplified cDNA was ligated to cDNAs encoding full-length forms of either wild-type (Cys351)Gi1alpha or either Gly351 or Ile351, pertussis toxin-resistant, forms of this G protein, which we have described previously (Wise et al., 1997c; Bahia et al., 1998). These had been amplified to remove the initiator codon and introduce a BamHI restriction site at the 5' end (Fig. 1). The ligated products were fully sequenced and were predicted to encode single open reading frames of 776 amino acids. Both these fusion constructs and the isolated 5-HT1A receptor were expressed stably in HEK293 cells and a number of individual clones isolated based on their capacity to specifically bind the selective antagonist ligand [3H]MPPF. Membrane preparations from cells either untreated or pretreated with pertussis toxin (25 ng/ml, 16 h) and expressing the isolated receptor or either wild-type- or Gly351 Gi1alpha -containing fusion proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and immunoblotted with an antiserum, I1C (Green et al., 1990), which identifies an epitope between amino acids 159 and 168 of Gi1alpha . All of these membranes expressed a 41-kDa polypeptide that comigrated with an I1C-reactive polypeptide from rat brain cortex, a particularly rich source of Gi1alpha (Fig. 2, bottom). Prior pertussis toxin treatment slightly slowed the mobility of this polypeptide through SDS-PAGE, as demonstrated for other systems (Wise et al., 1997a,c), a feature associated with the ADP-ribosylation of this and other pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (Fig. 2, bottom). Membranes expressing either of these 5-HT1A receptor-containing fusion proteins, but not the isolated receptor, also contained I1C-reactive polypeptides of apparent Mr of 85 to 90 kDa, consistent with expression of the fusion proteins (Fig. 2, top). Alterations in mobility of the fusion protein containing the wild-type form of the G protein in response to pertussis toxin treatment could not be observed. We believe this to reflect the large size of the fusion construct and thus its mobility through SDS-PAGE rather than its inability to be modified by pertussis toxin (see below).


View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Construction of human 5-HT1A receptor-Gi1alpha fusion proteins. Fusion protein cDNAs were constructed between the human 5HT1A-receptor and either wild-type (Cys351) (C) or pertussis toxin-resistant (Gly351)(G) and (Ile351)(I) form of Gi1alpha as described in Experimental Procedures. For convenience of construction this resulted in the addition of two amino acids (in bold) as a linker which are not present in either the isolated receptor or G protein.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunodetection of 5-HT1A receptor-Gi1alpha fusion proteins. Membranes from rat brain cortex (1), untreated (3,5,7), or pertussis toxin-treated (2,4,6) cells stably expressing 5HT1A-receptor wild-type Gi1alpha (2-3), 5HT1A-receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha (4-5) or the isolated 5HT1A-receptor (6-7) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antiserum I1C (Green et al., 1990), which identifies amino acids 159 to 168 of Gi1alpha . Top, detection of the fusion proteins. Bottom, detection of endogenous Gi1alpha .

Membranes from clones expressing each of the three fusion proteins were used to perform saturation binding studies with [3H]MPPF (Fig. 3 and data not shown). These indicated that each clone selected for detailed study expressed high levels of an apparently single population of [3H]MPPF binding sites with Bmax in the region of 10 pmol/mg membrane protein and a Kd for [3H]MPPF of 2.7 ± 0.2 nM. Prior treatment with pertussis toxin did not modify these parameters substantially (Fig. 3).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Binding studies with [3H]MPPF. The specific binding of varying concentration of [3H]MPPF was assessed, as described in Experimental Procedures, in membranes of untreated (open symbols) and pertussis toxin-treated (filled symbols) cells expressing the fusion protein between the human 5HT1A-receptor and (Gly351)Gi1alpha . Similar experiments were performed in membranes of each of the clonal cell lines used in these studies to assess levels of expression of the recombinant proteins.

Addition of 100 µM 5-HT to membranes of cells expressing each of the fusion proteins allowed stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity. To explore these processes in detail, 5-HT stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity was examined at a range of GTP concentrations. In membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein the agonist produced stimulation of high GTPase activity over a range of nucleotide concentrations (20 nM-2 µM) and transformation of such data to Eadie-Hofstee plots demonstrated the agonist to produce a large increase in Vmax without alteration in Km for GTP (Fig. 4A). Prior pertussis toxin treatment of these cells did not significantly reduce basal high-affinity GTPase activity and had little effect on 5-HT stimulation of activity (Fig. 4A). By contrast, pertussis toxin pretreatment greatly reduced basal high-affinity GTPase activity in the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein-expressing membranes (Fig. 4B) and substantially inhibited, but did not fully block, the capacity of 5-HT to stimulate this activity (Fig. 4B). Such data infer that the signal observed after pertussis toxin treatment in cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein must represent activation of the linked (Gly351)Gi1alpha of the fusion protein and imply little or no activation of the endogenously expressed forms of Gi by this fusion protein. By contrast, the effects of pertussis toxin in membranes derived from cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor fusion protein containing the wild-type G protein suggest both constitutive activity of this construct and the maintenance of a level of 5-HT-mediated functional activation of the linked G protein even when ADP-ribose has been attached to Cys351.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   5-HT stimulation of GTPase activity. Effects of pertussis toxin. Membranes of either untreated (, diamond ) or pertussis toxin-pretreated (, black-triangle) cells expressing fusion proteins between the human 5HT1A receptor and either (Gly351) Gi1alpha (4A) or wild-type (Cys351) Gi1alpha (4B) were analyzed for basal high-affinity GTPase activity (, ) and its regulation by 100 µM 5-HT (diamond , triangle ) at varying concentrations of GTP. Data so generated were converted to Eadie-Hofstee plots to analyze effects on Km for GTP hydrolysis and Vmax.

To explore both these differences in greater detail, membranes were prepared from cells expressing each of the fusion proteins, both with and without prior pertussis toxin treatment. The effects of toxin treatment on basal and ligand regulation of high-affinity GTPase activity were then explored using the agonists 5-HT, 7-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (7-OH DPAT) and 8-OH DPAT. Each of the agonists stimulated high-affinity GTPase activity to similar extents at maximally effective concentrations in untreated cells (Fig. 5 and data not shown). As anticipated from the data of Fig. 4, the effects of each of the agonists were unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha (Fig. 5) and -(Ile351)Gi1alpha (data not shown) fusion proteins and were blunted but not eliminated in cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein (Fig. 5).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Pharmacology of regulation of GTPase activity. Basal high-affinity GTPase activity in membranes of untreated (filled columns) or pertussis toxin treated (hatched columns) cells and its regulation by a range of ligands (all at 100 µM) was assessed for fusion proteins between the human 5HT1A receptor and either wild-type Gi1alpha (dark and bold hatched columns) or (Gly351)Gi1alpha (light and light hatched columns).

The ligand spiperone has been described as an inverse agonist at the human 5-HT1A receptor (Barr and Manning, 1997; Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a). At high concentrations spiperone clearly functioned as an inverse agonist in untreated membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein (Fig. 6A). No further effect of spiperone could be recorded, however, after pertussis toxin treatment of these cells (Fig. 6A), which as noted also in Fig. 4B reduced basal GTPase activity significantly. By contrast, no effect of spiperone as an inverse agonist could be measured in either in untreated or pertussis toxin-treated membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein (Fig. 6A), a feature consistent with the inability of pertussis toxin treatment to reduce basal high-affinity GTPase in membranes of these cells (Fig. 4A). In untreated membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion protein spiperone again displayed marked inverse agonism (Fig. 6A). As the basal GTPase activity of these membranes was unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 6A), spiperone still functioned as an inverse agonist after toxin treatment (Fig. 6A). These results confirmed that the constitutive GTPase activity in the 5-HT1A receptor-(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion protein expressing membranes, which was suppressed by spiperone, directly reflected activity derived from intramolecular interactions between the GPCR and G protein elements of the fusion protein. As with the stimulatory effects of 5-HT on the fusion proteins described above, the inhibitory effect of spiperone on the basal GTPase activity of the 5-HT1A receptor-(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion protein reflected a decrease in Vmax (Fig. 6B). Further analysis of these effects were produced by use of a range of concentrations of these ligands in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein (Fig. 7). 5-HT (EC50 = 1.0 ± 0.4 × 10-8 M, nH = 0.60) and 8-OH DPAT (EC50 = 3.3 ± 1.1 × 10-8 M, nH = 0.57) displayed similar potencies to activate the high-affinity GTPase activity of this construct, whereas 7-OH DPAT displayed a significantly lower potency (EC50 = 1.8 ± 0.8 × 10-6 M, nH = 0.47). The inverse agonist effects of spiperone were produced with EC50 of 7.1 ± 2.4 × 10-8 M and nH = 1.09. After pertussis toxin treatment not only were the maximal effects of the agonists blunted but required substantially higher ligand concentrations (Fig. 7). Because of the differences in effects of both pertussis toxin treatment and spiperone on the high-affinity GTPase activity of membranes expressing the various GPCR-G protein fusion proteins, equivalent experiments were performed on separate clones expressing each construct. Equivalent results to those described above were recorded in each case (data not shown).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Differential regulation of basal GTPase activity by pertussis toxin and spiperone in membranes expressing various 5-HT1A-Gi1alpha fusion proteins. A, membranes were prepared from untreated (filled columns) and pertussis toxin-pretreated (25 ng/ml, 24 h) (open columns) cells expressing 5-HT1A-Gi1alpha fusion proteins in which residue351 of the G protein was Cys, Gly, or Ile. Basal GTPase activity and its regulation by 10 µM spiperone was measured. Basal activity in untreated membranes expressing each construct is displayed as 100% (dark filled columns). The effects of spiperone (light filled columns) and pertussis toxin treatment (hatched columns) on basal activity are presented as a percentage of the activity remaining. The effects of spiperone after pertussis toxin treatment (open columns) are presented as a percentage of the basal activity after pertussis toxin treatment, i.e., of the data in cross hatched columns. There was no significant effect of spiperone in membranes expressing the Gly-containing fusion, whereas the inverse agonist effect of spiperone was still observed after pertussis toxin treatment of cells expressing the Ile containing fusion. By contrast the effect of spiperone was abolished by pertussis toxin treatment in membranes expressing the Cys-containing fusion. Data represent means ± S.E. from three individual experiments. In a representative experiment basal high-affinity GTPase activity (measured at 0.5 µM GTP) was 27.8 ± 0.6 pmol/min/mg protein in the (Cys351)Gi1alpha fusion protein expressing membranes, 10.3 ± 0.6 pmol/min/mg protein in those expressing the (Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein, and 20.6 ± 0.6 pmol/min/mg protein in those expressing the (Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion protein. Equivalent results were observed in membranes from either two (Cys, Gly) or three (Ile) individual clones expressing each construct. B, basal high-affinity GTPase activity () in untreated membranes expressing the 5-HT1A-(Ile351)-Gi1alpha fusion protein and its regulation by 10 µM spiperone (black-diamond ) were measured at varying concentrations of GTP as in Fig. 4. Data were converted to Eadie-Hofstee plots. Three additional experiments produced similar results.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Concentration-response curves for ligand regulation of GTPase activity of a 5-HT1A wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein. The capacity of varying concentrations of 5-HT (circles), spiperone (squares), 7-OH DPAT (triangles), and 8-OH DPAT (diamonds) to regulate basal high-affinity GTPase activity was assessed in membranes of untreated (open symbols) and pertussis toxin-treated (filled symbols) cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein.

Comparison of the effects of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase activity via the isolated 5-HT1A receptor and each of the fusion proteins demonstrated highly similar potencies (EC50 = 6 × 10-8- 2 × 10-7 M) and slope coefficients (nH = 0.52-0.64) of the agonist (Fig. 8). Although there was no detectable ability of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase activity via the isolated receptor after pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 8), and no alteration in function of 5-HT was recorded at the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein (EC50 = 6.5 ± 2.0 × 10-8 M, nH = 0.62), a clear reduction in effectiveness and potency (EC50 = 1.2 ± 0.2 × 10-6 M) was recorded for 5-HT at the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein (Fig. 8).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Potency of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase in the various constructs. The potency of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase activity was assessed in membranes of untreated (open symbols) and pertussis toxin-treated (filled symbols) cells stably expressing the isolated 5-HT1A-receptor (circles) and fusion proteins with either wild-type (squares) or pertussis toxin-resistant (Gly351) (triangles) Gi1alpha . Data are presented as the percentage of the effect produced by 100 µM 5-HT in untreated cells expressing each form of the receptor.

The 5-HT1A receptor is well established as a member of the family of GPCRs able to cause inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. In intact cells expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor, forskolin (50 µM)-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner with EC50 of 1.2 ± 0.6 × 10-9 M. This was obliterated after pertussis toxin treatment of the cells (Fig. 9). In cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein, 5-HT produced a profound, virtually complete, inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity with EC50 = 6.4 ± 0.4 × 10-9 M, which again was fully prevented by pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 10A). 5-HT displayed similar potency (EC50 = 3.7 ± 0.2 × 10-9 M) to mediate inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity via the 5-HT1A receptor-(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion protein. However, now prior pertussis toxin treatment did not modify the effect of the agonist (Fig. 10B). Similar results were produced in cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein except that the potency of 5-HT was some 10-fold lower (EC50 = 5.5 ± 0.6 × 10-8 M) but again pertussis toxin treatment did not substantially modify the inhibition (Fig. 10C). A surprising feature of adenylyl cyclase inhibition in cells expressing the fusion proteins containing both (Ile351)Gi1alpha and (Cys351)Gi1alpha was the apparent cooperativity of the effects of 5-HT. In both cases the concentration-effect curves had pseudo Hill coefficients between 1.5 and 2.0. 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity by the isolated 5-HT1A receptor. The capacity of varying concentrations of 5-HT to modulate intact cell adenylyl cyclase activity amplified with 50 µM forskolin (100%) was assessed in untreated (open circle ) and pertussis toxin-pretreated () cells stably expressing the isolated human 5-HT1A receptor. In the experiment displayed, 100% represented 56,575 ± 18,555 disintegrations per min in the untreated cells and 24,498 ± 4,255 disintegrations per min in the pertussis toxin-pretreated cells.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Adenylyl cyclase regulation in cells expressing the fusion proteins: effects of pertussis toxin. The regulation of 50 µM forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity was measured in untreated (open circle ) and pertussis toxin-pretreated () intact cells expressing fusion proteins between the human 5-HT1A receptor and either wild-type (A), Ile351 (B), or Gly351 (C) Gi1alpha .

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In the current study, we have used the strategy of constructing and stably expressing fusion proteins between a GPCR and a G protein alpha  subunit to promote and explore interactions between the human 5-HT1A receptor and forms of the G protein Gi1alpha . To do so we used both wild-type Gi1alpha and mutationally modified (Gly351, Ile351) forms of the G protein, which have previously been characterized extensively (Wise et al., 1997a; Bahia et al., 1998; Jackson et al., 1999), and are resistant to ADP ribosylation catalyzed by pertussis toxin. Each of these three fusion proteins, as well as the isolated 5-HT1A receptor, were expressed stably in HEK293 cells before functional analysis. In part, these studies were designed to build on our recent analyses of a stably expressed alpha 2A adrenoceptor-(Gly351) Gi1alpha fusion protein (Burt et al., 1998). However, the current studies have produced a significant range of differences from, as well as some similarities with, the previous studies. The most important of these is the clear demonstration that alteration of a single amino acid in the G protein can result in substantial differences in the constitutive activity of the GPCR-G protein fusion protein.

Identification of expression of the 5-HT1A receptor-Gi1alpha fusion proteins was achieved in two ways, first in ligand-binding studies using the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist [3H]MPPF. Such studies allowed selection for detailed analysis of clones expressing good levels of the fusion proteins and clones expressing similar levels of the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha and 5-HT1A receptor-pertussis toxin-resistant Gi1alpha forms. Second, immunoblots of membrane fractions of these clones using an antiserum with an epitope between amino acids 159 and 168 of Gi1alpha identified polypeptides of apparent Mr between 85 and 90 kDa, whereas a clone expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor did not, although it too specifically bound [3H]MPPF.

One attraction of the fusion protein strategy has been to allow detailed analysis of the receptor constructs as agonist-regulated high-affinity GTPases (Wise et al., 1997b; Carr et al., 1998). At a maximally effective concentration of 5-HT, each of the 5-HT1A receptor Gi1alpha fusion proteins caused a large stimulation of membrane high-affinity GTPase activity. In previous studies of an alpha 2A adrenoceptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein stably expressed in Rat-1 fibroblasts (Burt et al., 1998), analysis of agonist function in membranes of untreated and pertussis toxin-pretreated cells indicated that a large fraction of the agonist-stimulated signal derived from activation of the endogenously expressed forms of Gi. As such, pertussis toxin pretreatment was required to isolate and analyze GPCR interaction with the linked G protein. However, in the current studies, pertussis toxin pretreatment, under conditions which clearly caused ADP ribosylation of essentially the entire pool of endogenous Gi as measured by the reduced mobility of the modified protein through SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2), had essentially no effect on agonist-stimulated GTPase activity in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha or -(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion proteins (Fig. 4). These results indicate a lack of functional access of the expressed 5-HT1A receptor pertussis toxin-resistant Gi1alpha fusion proteins to a significant pool of endogenous Gi. Pertussis toxin treatment of these cells also had little effect on basal high-affinity GTPase activity, an observation that could be interpreted to suggest little constitutive activity (Samama et al., 1993; Lefkowitz et al., 1993) of these fusion proteins. However, because these fusion proteins cannot act as substrates for pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation these are not clear-cut experiments. To address this issue we made use of previous reports that spiperone acts as an inverse agonist at the human 5-HT1A receptor, able to reduce basal, agonist-independent, signal transduction (Barr and Manning, 1997; Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a,b). This ligand had little or no effect on the basal GTPase activity of membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha (Fig. 6A). However, in membranes expressing 5-HT1A receptor-(Ile351)Gi1alpha spiperone functioned as an effective inverse agonist. This effect of spiperone was not prevented by prior treatment of these cells with pertussis toxin (Fig. 6A), demonstrating convincingly that the effect of spiperone could not have been produced by interaction of the fusion construct with endogenously expressed Gi family proteins. This confirmed that the constitutive GTPase activity must result from intramolecular interactions between the GPCR and G protein of the fusion protein. Furthermore, the effect of spiperone was shown to represent a decrease in Vmax of the intrinsic constitutive activity of this fusion protein (Fig. 6B). Unlike the situation described above, pertussis toxin pretreatment produced a substantial reduction in basal high-affinity GTPase activity in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein, a feature at least consistent with constitutive activity of this construct. Addition of spiperone to membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of basal high-affinity GTPase activity with EC50 entirely in accord with that reported previously for the isolated 5-HT1A receptor (Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a). These observations, in parallel with those of the other fusion proteins, confirmed the constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein. Furthermore, as the inverse agonist activity of spiperone was completely lacking in membranes after pertussis toxin pretreatment, this indicates that the effectiveness of agonist-independent (as well as agonist-induced) interactions between the GPCR and G protein elements of the fusion protein had been substantially reduced or ablated by attachment of ADP-ribose to Cys351.

The current studies also bear comparison with the demonstration that a fusion protein between the beta 2 adrenoceptor and the long splice variant of Gsalpha displayed greater constitutive activity than an equivalent fusion protein containing the short splice variant of this G protein (Seifert et al., 1998). However, in the current case this alteration in measurable constitutive activity is even more dramatic, resulting from a single amino acid alteration in the G protein sequence. This provides a unique example of regulation of GPCR constitutive activity.

Previous studies have shown that the 5-HT1A receptor is able to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity. In cells expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor inhibition of forskolin-amplified activity by 80 to 90% could be achieved with low concentrations of 5-HT. Pertussis toxin treatment essentially attenuated this effect. It has previously been noted that after stable expression of an alpha 2A adrenoceptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein agonists could mediate highly effective inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity in intact, untreated cells. However, after pertussis toxin treatment this effect was completely attenuated (Burt et al., 1998). Such results argued that the fusion protein-linked G protein was unable to produce the effect and that regulation of effector function reflected activation of the endogenous Gi protein. In cells expressing both the 5-HT1A receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha and -(Ile351)Gi1alpha fusion proteins, 5-HT was able to produce robust and concentration-dependent inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity. However, and in agreement with the lack of effect of pertussis toxin on the capacity of 5-HT to activate high-affinity GTPase in membranes from these cells, pertussis toxin had little effect on agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, the ability of 5-HT to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity in cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein was fully attenuated by pertussis toxin treatment.

Pertussis toxin-treatment was not able to fully attenuate agonist stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity in cells expressing the fusion protein containing the wild-type G protein (Fig. 4B). Although this may initially appear surprising, these observations are entirely in accord with previous studies on an alpha 2A adrenoceptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion protein (Carr et al., 1998). Although the extreme C terminus of G protein alpha  subunits is a key GPCR contact site it is clearly not the only one (Bourne, 1997; Hamm, 1998). Therefore, although pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of Gi-like proteins appears to fully uncouple GPCRs from coexpressed but resolved G proteins, now for two separate receptor systems, it is not sufficient to fully eliminate agonist-mediated information transfer between the two proteins given their enforced proximity in the fusion construction. With this in mind it might then also be considered surprising that pertussis toxin treatment resulted in a complete attenuation of agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. However, the lack of signal amplification defined by the 1:1 molar ratio of GPCR and G protein in the fusion protein means that high levels of fusion protein expression are required to produce downstream signaling. Indeed in the case of an A1 adenosine receptor-(Gly351)Gi1alpha fusion protein, agonist activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity can be observed with high level of expression of the construct but this is rapidly lost with diminishing levels of the fusion protein (N. Bevan, A. Wise, G.M. and S. Rees, in preparation). Furthermore, based on our analysis of the interactions between point mutants of Gi1alpha at Cys351 and the alpha 2A adrenoceptor, where greater hydrophilicity both limited functional activation by agonist and moved the response curve for agonist to higher concentrations (Bahia et al., 1998; Jackson et al., 1999), it is not surprising that ADP-ribosylation of the fusion protein at this position should have been observed to reduce the potency of 5-HT to stimulate GTPase activity (Fig. 8). However, it should also be noted that 5-HT displayed equivalent potency to stimulate the GTPase activity of the 5-HT1A receptor(Gly351)Gi1alpha and the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1alpha fusion proteins (Fig. 8) and thus substitution of Cys351 by Gly in Gi1alpha does not appear to be as deleterious to agonist function at the 5-HT1A receptor as for the alpha 2A adrenoceptor (Bahia et al., 1998; Jackson et al., 1999).

These studies have provided a wealth of information on the details of interactions between the 5-HT1A receptor and Gi1alpha , not least relating to the appearance and detection of constitutive activity and inverse agonism. We predict that further analysis of the pharmacology of regulation of these and related fusion constructs will provide additional novel insights.

    Footnotes

Received April 1, 1999; Accepted June 24, 1999

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the European Union Biomed II program: Inverse agonism: Implications for drug design.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Graeme Milligan, Davidson Bldg., University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, United Kingdom. E-mail: g.milligan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk

    Abbreviations

5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; MPPF, 4(2'-methoxy)-phenyl-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-fluorobenzamido]ethyl-piperazine; OH-DPAT, hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HEK, human embryonic kidney; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References


0026-895X/99/040684-09$3.00/0
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 56:684-692 (1999).
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. D. Hildebrandt
Bring Your Own G Protein
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1079 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
S. Takeda, T. Okada, M. Okamura, T. Haga, J. Isoyama-Tanaka, H. Kuwahara, and N. Minamino
The Receptor-G{alpha} Fusion Protein as a Tool for Ligand Screening: a Model Study Using a Nociceptin Receptor-G{alpha}i2 Fusion Protein
J. Biochem., May 1, 2004; 135(5): 597 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Hiol, P. C. Davey, J. L. Osterhout, A. A. Waheed, E. R. Fischer, C.-K. Chen, G. Milligan, K. M. Druey, and T. L. Z. Jones
Palmitoylation Regulates Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) 16 Function: I. MUTATION OF AMINO-TERMINAL CYSTEINE RESIDUES ON RGS16 PREVENTS ITS TARGETING TO LIPID RAFTS AND PALMITOYLATION OF AN INTERNAL CYSTEINE RESIDUE
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19301 - 19308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Osterhout, A. A. Waheed, A. Hiol, R. J. Ward, P. C. Davey, L. Nini, J. Wang, G. Milligan, T. L. Z. Jones, and K. M. Druey
Palmitoylation Regulates Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) 16 Function: II. PALMITOYLATION OF A CYSTEINE RESIDUE IN THE RGS BOX IS CRITICAL FOR RGS16 GTPase ACCELERATING ACTIVITY AND REGULATION OF Gi-COUPLED SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19309 - 19316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Molinari, C. Ambrosio, D. Riitano, M. Sbraccia, M. C. Gro, and T. Costa
Promiscuous Coupling at Receptor-Galpha Fusion Proteins. THE RECEPTOR OF ONE COVALENT COMPLEX INTERACTS WITH THE alpha -SUBUNIT OF ANOTHER
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 15778 - 15788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Derrien, B. Zheng, J. L. Osterhout, Y.-C. Ma, G. Milligan, M. G. Farquhar, and K. M. Druey
Src-mediated RGS16 Tyrosine Phosphorylation Promotes RGS16 Stability
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 16107 - 16116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Newman-Tancredi, D. Cussac, L. Marini, and M. J. Millan
Antibody Capture Assay Reveals Bell-Shaped Concentration-Response Isotherms for h5-HT1A Receptor-Mediated Galpha i3 Activation: Conformational Selection by High-Efficacy Agonists, and Relationship to Trafficking of Receptor Signaling
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2002; 62(3): 590 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.