MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmieden, V.
Right arrow Articles by Betz, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmieden, V.
Right arrow Articles by Betz, H.

Vol. 56, Issue 3, 464-472, September 1999

A Novel Domain of the Inhibitory Glycine Receptor Determining Antagonist Efficacies: Further Evidence for Partial Agonism Resulting from Self-Inhibition

Volker Schmieden,1 Jochen Kuhse,2 and Heinrich Betz

Department of Neurochemistry, Max-Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt/Main, Federal Republic of Germany

    Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Different amino side chains in the N-terminal extracellular region of the inhibitory glycine receptor (GlyR) have been shown to be crucial for ligand recognition. Here we describe a novel domain of the GlyRalpha 1 subunit that constitutes an important determinant of antagonist activity. The antagonists strychnine, nipecotic acid, and isobutyric acid displayed reduced potencies at recombinant GlyRs formed from alpha 1 subunits, in which lysine 104, phenylalanine 108, or threonine 112 were replaced by alanine. Agonist affinities, in contrast, were slightly increased at these mutant receptors. Taurine and beta -aminoisobutyric acid, which are partial agonists at the wild-type GlyR, behaved as full agonists at the mutant GlyRs and failed to inhibit glycine-induced currents. This is consistent with apolar residues at positions 104, 108, and 112 of the alpha 1 subunit reducing the antagonistic, but not the agonistic, binding of beta -amino acids. Our data support a model in which the partial agonism of beta -amino acids results from their self-inhibitory activity.

    Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The inhibitory glycine receptor (GlyR) is a member of the ligand-gated ion channel family that mediates synaptic inhibition by increasing the chloride permeability of the postsynaptic membrane. Biochemical and molecular studies indicate that the GlyR is a pentameric membrane protein composed of ligand-binding alpha  and structural beta  subunits. The alpha  subunit exists in various isoforms (alpha 1-alpha 4), which all form functional homo-oligomeric receptor channels upon heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes or mammalian cell lines (reviewed in Kuhse et al., 1995).

Site-directed mutagenesis indicates that different domains within the extracellular amino-terminal region of the GlyR alpha 1 subunit contribute to ligand binding. These include amino acid residues at positions 52 (Ryan et al., 1994; Saul et al., 1994), 159 to 161 (Vandenberg et al., 1992a; Schmieden et al., 1993), and 200 to 206 (Vandenberg et al., 1992b), respectively. Substitution of these positions has been shown to alter the apparent affinities of agonists and/or competitive antagonists. Interestingly, the homologous positions of type A gamma -aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAARs) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors also have been found to be crucial for ligand binding (Galzi and Changeux, 1995). In addition, mutations causing hereditary hyperekplexia have been located in the short loop connecting transmembrane segments 2 and 3 and shown to drastically alter both agonist affinity and channel gating (Langosch et al., 1994; Rajendra et al., 1995; Lewis et al., 1998).

Previous comparisons of the agonist response properties of alpha 1 and alpha 2 GlyRs have identified residue 111 of the alpha 1 subunit as a crucial determinant of activation by the partial agonist taurine (Schmieden et al., 1992). Taurine displays a highly variable efficacy of GlyR gating in different preparations and has been proposed to act as a GlyR subtype- or cell type-specific ligand (Lewis et al., 1991). However, some of the reported differences in agonist efficacy may result from the antagonistic properties of beta -amino acids (Horikoshi et al., 1988; Schmieden and Betz, 1995). Here, we mutated residues around position 111 of the GlyR alpha 1 subunit and found that substitution of aromatic, polar, and charged side chains at positions 104, 108, and 112 decreases antagonist but increases agonist potencies. Our data are consistent with the low efficacy of beta -amino acid partial agonists resulting from self-inhibition.

    Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In Vitro Mutagenesis and RNA Synthesis. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was performed on single-stranded cDNA of the human GlyR alpha 1 subunit cloned into pBluescript (Grenningloh et al., 1990) using an in vitro mutagenesis kit (In Vitro Mutagenesis System II; Amersham, Amersham, UK). All mutants were identified and verified by dideoxy sequencing of the mutated regions. EcoRV linearized plasmid DNAs were used for synthesis of RNA (mRNA Capping Kit; Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA) with T3 RNA polymerase as described (Schmieden et al., 1992).

Oocyte Expression and Electrophysiology. The methods used for analyzing the pharmacology of recombinant GlyRs have been described previously (Schmieden et al., 1989). Briefly, Xenopus laevis oocytes were removed from frogs anesthetized with urethane (Sigma, Munich, Germany), dissected after collagenase (Sigma) treatment, and injected with cRNAs (10-20 ng per oocyte) of the human GlyR alpha 1 subunit and mutants thereof. Voltage-clamp recording of whole-cell currents was performed 24 to 48 h after injection at a holding potential of -70 mV. Experimental values are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. of peak current responses. For the evaluation of half-maximal effective agonist concentrations (EC50) and Hill coefficients (h) from dose-response curves, data from several oocytes were fitted by the logistic equation:
<UP>I</UP>=<FR><NU><UP>I<SUB>max</SUB></UP></NU><DE><FENCE><FR><NU><UP>EC</UP><SUB><UP>50</UP></SUB></NU><DE><UP>L</UP></DE></FR></FENCE><SUP><UP>h</UP></SUP>+1</DE></FR> (1)
where I corresponds to the current obtained, Imax to the maximal agonist-induced current, and L to the concentration of the ligand used. Inhibition curves were obtained by coapplying glycine at a concentration corresponding to its EC50 value with increasing concentrations of antagonist. Wash-out times between each application were 3 to 5 min.

Data Analysis. Analysis of the pharmacological data was performed on a MacIntosh computer using a fitting program written by V. Schmieden. The algorithm used calculates the differences between the measured data (Yx) and the values (Y) obtained by equation fitting. By reiterating the parameters EC50 from eq. 1, and Ka, Kb, and h, respectively, from eq. 3, an optimal fit was established by minimizing the sum of the square of residuals (SS; Bowen and Jerman, 1995) according to:
<UP>SS</UP>=<LIM><OP>∑</OP></LIM>(<UP>Y</UP>−<UP>Y<SUB>x</SUB></UP>)<SUP>2</SUP> (2)
Partial agonist dose-response curves were fractionated into their agonistic and antagonistic contributions by assuming a mole fraction factor of F = 1 (see below). This results in:
<UP>I</UP>=<FR><NU><UP>I</UP><SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>[<UP>L</UP>]<SUP><UP>h</UP></SUP></NU><DE><FENCE><IT>K</IT><SUB><UP>a</UP></SUB>+F<FR><NU><IT>K</IT><SUB><UP>a</UP></SUB>[<UP>L</UP>]</NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUB><UP>b</UP></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE><SUP><UP>h</UP></SUP>+[<UP>L</UP>]<SUP><UP>h</UP></SUP></DE></FR> (3)
where Ka and Kb represent the binding constants for the respective agonistic and antagonistic conformers of beta -amino acids. [L] denotes the total concentration of beta -amino acid, h is the Hill coefficient, and Imax represents the maximal current evoked by the full agonist glycine.

    Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Characterization of Agonist Responses. We first analyzed oocytes injected with the GlyR alpha 1 subunit mutants K104A, F108A, and T112A for their responses to several alpha -amino acids. This revealed significant changes in agonist pharmacology resulting from these substitutions.

Superfusion of glycine at a concentration of 1 mM evoked inward current responses of up to several µA from all three mutants (Fig. 1A). The onset and desensitization of agonist-induced currents were similar to those obtained for the wild-type (wt) alpha 1 subunit GlyR. This indicates that the amino acid substitutions introduced had no major effects on expression efficiency or gating properties. The glycine concentrations generating half-maximal responses (EC50) calculated from dose-effect curves were 0.15 ± 0.01 and 0.11 ± 0.02 mM for the K104A and T112A mutants, respectively (Fig. 1B). These values resemble that found for the wt alpha 1 subunit (EC50 = 0.20 ± 0.03 mM). Substitution of phenylalanine at position 108 by alanine in mutant F108A generated receptor channels displaying a 3-fold higher affinity for glycine (EC50 = 0.06 ± 0.01 mM). Hill coefficients ranged between 2.1 and 2.3 for all these homo-oligomeric GlyRs.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Current responses elicited by GlyR agonists (A) in oocytes expressing wt GlyR and the mutants alpha 1K104A, alpha 1F108A, and alpha 1T112A, respectively. Bars above the traces indicate duration of agonist application, and numbers indicate agonist concentration in mM. Dose-response curves of glycine (B), taurine (C), and beta -aminobutyric acid (beta -ABA; D) are shown for the respective mutants as indicated by the inset. Fractional current values normalized to the maximal response obtained for each agonist (I/Imax) are given. For comparison, the dose-response curves for glycine, taurine, and beta -ABA, respectively, obtained at the wt alpha 1 GlyR are shown (dotted line; see Schmieden and Betz, 1995).

As reported previously (Tokutomi et al., 1989; Schmieden and Betz, 1995), alpha -amino acid derivatives with Calpha substitutions displayed stereospecific agonist activity. L-alanine and L-serine behaved as full agonists at all mutants tested (data not shown), with EC50 values between 0.73 to 1.64 and 0.97 to 5.9 mM, respectively (see Table 1). This represents a 2- to 4-fold increase in the agonistic potency of these amino acids as compared with the wt alpha 1 GlyR. In contrast, a strong increase in the relative current response was obtained for the stereoisomers D-alanine and D-serine. Whereas D-serine does not gate the wt alpha 1 GlyR channel (Schmieden and Betz, 1995), it elicited strong currents in oocytes expressing the mutants K104A, F108A, and T112A. Compared to saturating concentrations of glycine, D-serine exhibited maximal responses of 64 ± 13% at K104A and of 90% at F108A and T112A, respectively (data not shown), with EC50 values ranging between 6 and 22 mM (Table 1). Remarkably, the EC50 values of D-alanine were found to be 6- to 13-fold lower with the different mutants than that determined for the wt alpha 1 subunit (Table 1). These data show that substitutions at positions 104, 108, or 112 alter the stereoselective binding of D-amino acids to the inhibitory GlyR.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Agonist pharmacology of the GlyR alpha 1 subunit mutants K104A, F108A, and T112A

Amino acid responses were recorded from oocytes injected with the different mutant alpha 1 cRNAs as described. The agonist concentrations eliciting a half-maximal response (EC50; mean ± S.E.M.) of n experiments were calculated from least-square fits of the corresponding dose-effect curves. Imax values of taurine, beta -AIBA, and beta -ABA are given as a fraction of the maximal glycine current.

beta -Amino acids are known to behave as partial agonists at the alpha 1 GlyR, with a rank order of beta -alanine > taurine > beta -aminobutyric acid (beta -ABA) when maximal current responses were compared to that of glycine (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). Whereas application of 10 mM taurine produced relative responses of about 0.32 at the wt alpha 1 GlyR, the mutants K104A, F108A, and T112A were very efficiently gated by taurine, with relative responses of 0.74, 0.90, and 0.86, respectively (Fig. 1A, Table 1). Figure 1C indicates that this increased efficacy was not the result of a change in affinity, because the EC50 values of taurine were very similar for the wt alpha 1 subunit and the various mutants. Another important difference from oocytes injected with wt alpha 1 cRNA became apparent when the mutant receptors were exposed to beta -ABA. This beta -amino acid analog generated maximal currents of 63 to 77% of the glycine Imax at all three mutants (Table 1); this represents an increase in gating efficacy of about 10-fold. The respective dose-effect curves differed much more from the wt alpha 1 GlyR than those obtained for taurine. Although concentrations of 4.3 ± 0.7 mM beta -ABA were sufficient to evoke a half-maximal response at K104A, the mutants F108A and T112A exhibited EC50 values of 1.9 ± 0.5 and 9.7 ± 1.7 mM, respectively (Fig. 1D and Table 1). The Hill coefficient for beta -ABA of about 1.3 at all mutants was significantly lower than that obtained for glycine.

The third known partial agonist of the GlyR is beta -aminoisobutyric acid (beta -AIBA), whose maximal responses at the wt alpha 1 GlyR correspond to only about 5% of the glycine Imax (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). Interestingly, even 50 mM beta -AIBA failed to evoke saturating responses at K104A-expressing oocytes. At 6 out of 10 oocytes, no current response to beta -AIBA was detectable, whereas the respective glycine current was >1 µA. A least-squares fit of the resulting data indicated a relative efficacy of 0.11 and an EC50 value of 21 mM (Table 1). Thus, beta -AIBA was significantly less potent at the mutant receptors than the related molecule beta -ABA.

Antagonist Pharmacology. To investigate whether the substitutions described above also affect antagonist efficacy, we examined several antagonists for their potency to inhibit glycine responses.

Nanomolar concentrations of strychnine are known to potently suppress glycine-induced currents at the wt alpha 1 GlyR (Sontheimer et al., 1989; Grenningloh et al., 1990). Here, strychnine was tested using glycine at a concentration corresponding to its EC50 value. Figure 2A shows that the mutants K104A and F108A were about 6- to 10-fold less sensitive to the alkaloid (IC50 values of 172 ± 9 and 293 ± 6 nM, respectively) than the alpha 1 subunit receptor (IC50 of about 15 nM). A much stronger shift of the inhibition curve to low affinity was obtained for T112A (IC50 of 1.6 ± 0.1 µM; Table 2).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Inhibition of glycine responses of the mutants alpha 1K104A (black-square), alpha 1F108A (), and alpha 1T112A () by strychnine (A) and nipecotic acid (nip; B). Glycine at half-saturating concentration was coapplied with increasing concentrations of the indicated antagonists. Current values were normalized to the glycine response obtained in the absence of antagonist and were fitted by a single sigmoidal curve. Error bars often were smaller than the symbols used, and are not indicated. For comparison, the inhibition curves for strychnine and nipecotic acid obtained at the wt alpha 1 GlyR are shown (dotted line; see Schmieden and Betz, 1995).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Antagonist pharmacology

Inhibition of glycine currents by antagonists was analyzed in oocytes injected with the mutant alpha 1 cRNAs. IC50 values were determined using a glycine concentration corresponding to the respective EC50 value (see Table 1). Data represent mean ± S.E.M. of n experiments and are given for strychnine in nM, 5,7CIQA in µM, and nipecotic acid, isonipecotic acid, isobutyric acid, and beta -AIBA in mM, respectively.

Piperidin-3-carboxylic acid (nipecotic acid) has been described as a competitive antagonist of the GlyR, with an IC50 value of 0.8 ± 0.1 mM (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). At all mutants, the potency of this heterocycle was significantly reduced (Fig. 2B), resulting in IC50 values of about 3 mM for K104A and F108A, and of about 7 mM for T112A (Table 2). The piperidine derivative isonipecotic acid was also analyzed on K104A and showed a significant reduction in affinity (Table 2). Finally, inhibition of glycine currents by the alpha -amino acid isobutyric acid (IC50 = 20.4 ± 1.3 mM; n = 3) was strongly reduced (Table 2).

A new class of GlyR antagonists is represented by the kynurenic acid analog 5,7-dichloro-4-hydroxy-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid (5,7ClQA). This compound inhibits in a mixed competitive/noncompetitive fashion, which originates from the chloride substitution at the aromatic ring system (Schmieden et al., 1996). On K104A and wt alpha 1 GlyR expressing oocytes, IC50 values for 5,7ClQA were similar (Table 2).

To examine whether the effects described above might be potentiated upon multiple substitution, we designed a triple (K104A, F108A, T112A) alpha 1 mutant. The resulting receptor was potently gated by agonists, but showed a pharmacological profile related to that of the mutant F108A. Briefly, the EC50 value for glycine was 0.063 ± 0.01 mM (n = 4); taurine and beta -ABA exhibited EC50 values of 0.61 ± 0.09 mM (n = 3) and 3.17 ± 0.78 mM (n = 4), respectively. Maximal responses for taurine were 100%, and for beta -ABA 60% of the glycine Imax. Furthermore, nipecotic acid and strychnine antagonized current responses with IC50 values of 3.18 ± 0.9 mM (n = 3) and 0.32 ± 0.1 µM (n = 3), respectively.

In conclusion, substitution of lysine 104, phenylalanine 108, or threonine 112 by alanine reduced the potency of antagonists in a rank order of strychnine > isobutyric acid > nipecotic acid, whereas the apparent affinities of agonists were inversely increased (Fig. 3). This indicates a critical role for these amino acid side chains and/or the region defined by these mutations in determining the consequences of ligand binding.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Histogram of the relative affinities of agonists and antagonists at the alpha 1 subunit mutants. The EC50 values of glycine (gly), taurine (tau), and beta -ABA and the IC50 values of the antagonists strychnine (stry) and nipecotic acid (nip) are plotted as a fraction ± S.D. of that found for the wt alpha 1 GlyR (see Schmieden and Betz, 1995). Note that downward deflection indicates a decrease in affinity.

Modeling of Partial Agonist Function. We have previously shown that the beta -amino acids taurine and in particular beta -ABA and beta -AIBA exhibit antagonistic activity when coapplied with glycine (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). To test whether a similar behavior is found for the mutants described above, we performed inhibition experiments with taurine on oocytes expressing mutant K104A. As shown in Fig. 4A, increasing concentrations of taurine generated strong currents when applied alone. In the presence of 100 µM glycine, both ligands acted synergistically as agonists. Similar results were found for beta -ABA; again the dose-effect curve of glycine was not shifted when 2 mM beta -ABA was added (Fig. 4B). These data indicate a loss of the antagonistic properties of these beta -amino acids upon mutation of lysine 104. In contrast, beta -AIBA still potently inhibited glycine responses (Fig. 4C). The current elicited by 0.1 mM glycine was drastically reduced when increasing concentrations of beta -AIBA were coapplied. Analysis of the data indicated an IC50 value for beta -AIBA of 2.4 mM (Table 2).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Competition of glycine responses by partial agonists. A, representative dose-response curve of taurine from an individual alpha 1K104A cRNA-injected oocyte in the absence () and presence () of 0.1 mM glycine. B, representative dose-response curve of glycine from a second alpha 1K104A cRNA-injected oocyte in the absence () and presence () of 0.2 mM beta -ABA. C, mean dose-effect curves of beta -AIBA in the absence () and presence (open circle ) of 0.1 mM glycine (n = 4). Note the high potency of beta -AIBA to inhibit glycine-induced currents. Peak amplitudes of glycine responses were plotted as current relative to that obtained with saturating glycine concentrations (I/Imax).

It is worth noting that the current responses elicited by the partial agonists taurine and beta -ABA were strongly enhanced upon mutation, whereas those of beta -AIBA were not. To unravel the basis of this observation, we plotted the determined Imax values against the respective EC50 values for each mutant (Fig. 5A). Neither taurine nor beta -ABA or beta -AIBA showed a good correlation between agonist efficacy and apparent affinity. For example, the relative Imax value of beta -ABA found at the T112A mutant was much larger (75%) than that (7%) obtained with the wt alpha 1 subunit. The EC50 value for this ligand, however, was lower at wt alpha 1 than at T112A GlyRs. This analysis indicates that the different binding affinities of beta -amino acids as defined by their EC50 values are not sufficient to explain their vastly different gating efficacies.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, correlation of the maximal currents (Imax) induced by the partial agonists taurine (+), beta -ABA (-), and beta -AIBA (*), and their respective EC50 values determined in oocytes expressing wt alpha 1 subunit GlyR (open circle ) and the mutants alpha 1K104A (black-square), alpha 1F108A (), and alpha 1T112A (black-triangle), respectively. Imax values were plotted as current relative to that induced by a saturating glycine concentration. Bars represent the mean ± S.E.M. of three to six experiments. B, dose response curves of taurine (black-square), beta -ABA (), and beta -AIBA () at mutant K104A. For comparison, data points were fitted by eq. 1 (broken line) and eq. 3 (solid line) as described in the text. EC50 and slope (h) values calculated for ligand-induced currents using eq. 1 were for taurine 0.8 mM (h = 1.7), beta -ABA 4.14 mM (h = 1.4), and beta -AIBA 22 mM (h = 1.5). Ka and Kb values (Ka:Kb) calculated according to eq. 3 were for taurine 0.5:0.8 mM, for beta -ABA 2.9:4.1 mM, and for beta -AIBA 17:9.6 mM. The Hill coefficients were about 2.6. Note that Imax values for all curves were set to 1. C, the maximal induced current of the beta -amino acids shown in (A) are plotted against the ratio of the binding equivalents Ka and Kb. Both parameters are the results of the least square fitting procedure of eq. 3 as shown in Table 3. The slope of the sigmoidal curve resulting was -2.

In a previously published model of partial agonist action, we speculated that the low current responses of beta -amino acids might be due to a dual action as both activators and competitive inhibitors (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). This was proposed to reflect different molecular conformations of the ligand. The dose-response profiles of partial agonists may thus be considered as the sum of both an agonist and an antagonist concentration-effect curve. Under conditions of full binding site saturation, the relative maximal current (Irel) obtained with a partial agonist should be proportional to the ratio of Ka/Kb, i.e., the binding constants for the activating and inhibiting conformers, as follows:
<UP>I<SUB>rel</SUB></UP>=<FR><NU><UP>I<SUB>max</SUB></UP></NU><DE><FENCE><FR><NU><IT>K</IT><SUB><UP>a</UP></SUB></NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUB><UP>b</UP></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE><SUP><UP>h</UP></SUP>+1</DE></FR> (4)
We therefore examined whether the concentration-effect curves of taurine, beta -ABA, and beta -AIBA could be described as a fraction of two components (eq. 3; see Materials and Methods). Figure 5B shows a least-squares fit for the partial agonists tested, in which Imax was normalized to the maximal glycine current. For taurine, a ratio of Ka/Kb of 0.63 (Ka = 0.51; Kb = 0.8) and a Hill coefficient of 2.6 were calculated. Whereas this Ka value is comparable to the determined EC50 value (Table.1), the resulting Hill coefficient was significantly higher than the slope obtained by a simple fit (eq. 1) and very similar to that found for glycine. Correspondingly, for beta -ABA and beta -AIBA, ratios of 0.707 (Ka = 2.9; Kb = 4.1) and 1.88 (Ka = 17.2; Kb = 9,13), respectively, were found. Again, for both ligands the calculated Hill coefficients were 2.1 and 2.6. This result strengthens the view that the reduced agonist efficacies of these partial agonists are due to competitive self-inhibition.

This approach was also used to model the low current responses of partial agonists at the alpha 1 wt GlyR and the high current responses obtained for mutants F108A and T112A. To this end, the individual dose-response relations of taurine, beta -ABA, and beta -AIBA were fitted by eq. 3. The parameters calculated from this analysis are summarized in Table 3. It is obvious that the calculated Ka values and the experimentally determined EC50 values were rather similar. A high current response is thus the consequence of a low Kb value. In other words, the mutations described minimize the antagonistic binding of partial agonists and increase the efficacy of agonistic interaction. In Fig. 5C, the maximal currents evoked by saturating concentrations of the beta -amino acids were plotted versus the logarithm of the calculated Ka/Kb ratios. All determined maximal currents showed a good correlation with the affinity ratios Ka/Kb. The sigmoidal shape of the data fit is consistent with eq. 4 and exhibits a slope of -2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Parameters of fitting procedures

The data of the concentration-effect relations of the partial agonists taurine, beta -ABA, and beta -AIBA were fitted by eq. 3 (see text) using a least squares procedure. The equivalents of agonistic and antagonistic binding are described by Ka and Kb, respectively (mean ± S.E.M.); n is the Hill coefficient. The numbers of experiments are given in brackets. The quality of fits was determined by the sum of squares (SS1). In addition, fits were designed by the logistic function 1 (see Materials and Methods); their quality is represented by SS2. All values of SS1 and SS2 are multiplied by hundred. Values for the wt alpha 1 subunit GlyR were calculated from the data given in Schmieden and Betz, 1996.

In conclusion, mutations at positions 104, 108, and 112 of the alpha 1 subunit generate GlyRs displaying increased agonist and reduced antagonist affinities. Notably, the efficacies of partial agonists were significantly higher than at the wt alpha 1 GlyR. This is consistent with an impairment of beta -amino acid antagonism.

    Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we describe the pharmacology of three GlyR alpha 1 subunit mutants, in which lysine 104, phenylalanine 108, and threonine 112, respectively, were replaced by alanine. Like the wt alpha 1 subunit, these mutants generated fully functional receptor proteins that displayed moderate increases in agonist affinity. The largest reductions in EC50 values were seen for D-alanine and D-serine, whereas glycine, L-alanine, L-serine, and taurine affinities were detectably affected only upon substitution of phenylalanine 108. Notably, beta -ABA and beta -AIBA displayed rather low apparent affinities at mutants T112A and K104A. This might be due to the exposed methyl groups at their Calpha and Cbeta atoms, which may restrict interactions with the mutated binding pocket.

The most interesting result obtained with our GlyR mutants is that the apparent changes in antagonist affinities were opposite to those found for the alpha -amino acid agonists. Similar observations have recently been reported for the GABAAR (Ebert et al., 1997). Strychnine, isobutyric acid, nipecotic acid, and isonipecotic acid all inhibited the glycine response only with high IC50 values. This decrease in antagonist affinity was most pronounced with mutant T112A. Interestingly, the partial agonist beta -AIBA inhibited glycine responses at mutant K104A to >90%; however, its IC50 value was 3-fold higher than that obtained at the wt alpha 1 subunit. A similarly reduced antagonistic affinity was also found for nipecotic and isonipecotic acid. From this data one may speculate that beta -AIBA and the other GlyR antagonists use similar subsites within the binding pocket.

Our results imply that aromatic, polar, and charged amino acid residues in the mutated region contribute to antagonist efficacy in a rank order of threonine 112 > phenylalanine 108 > lysine 104. Agonist affinities, in contrast, increased when introducing apolar side chains at these positions. Interestingly, the pharmacological profile of the triple mutant (K104A, F108A, T112A) resembled that of the single mutant F108A. This suggests that the domain harboring positions 104 to 112 contributes only to a limited extent to antagonist/receptor interaction. Consequently, multiple substitutions in this region may not cause further reductions in antagonist affinities. Similarly, substitution of histidine 107 and glutamate 110 had no significant effect on antagonist recognition (Schmieden et al., 1992).

An important role of aromatic residues in ligand recognition by neurotransmitter receptors has been demonstrated in various studies. For the GlyR, photoaffinity labeling by strychnine has been proposed to involve energy transfer from aromatic side chains, such as tyrosine (Graham et al., 1983). Mutational analysis identified tyrosines 161 and 202 as crucial determinants of strychnine binding (Vandenberg et al., 1992a; Rajendra et al., 1995). Furthermore, the exchange of phenylalanine 159 and tyrosine 161 has been found to increase agonist but not antagonist affinity (Schmieden et al., 1993). In addition, charged amino acid residues like lysine 200 (Rajendra et al., 1995) promote both strychnine and glycine recognition, whereas mutations of the polar residue threonine 204 selectively reduces agonist binding (Rajendra et al., 1995). These findings lead us to propose that the agonist and antagonist recognition site of the GlyR contains two domains (positions 159-161 and 200-204), where agonists bind to hydroxyl moieties, whereas antagonists interact directly with aromatic ring systems (see also Rajendra et al., 1995). The domain harboring positions 104 to 112 includes both hydroxylated and aromatic side chains; however, it appears crucial primarily for antagonist efficacy.

The question whether the amino acid residues mutated here are directly involved in ligand binding cannot be answered presently. Homologous positions of the GABAAR have been implicated in benzodiazepine recognition (Siegel and Buhr, 1997). Threonine 142 of the gamma  subunit and histidine 101 of the alpha 1 subunit of the GABAAR are thought to contribute to the interface between both subunits (Galzi and Changeux, 1995). Mutation of position 100 in the GABAAR alpha 6 subunit (corresponding to H101 of the alpha 1 GABAAR subunit) caused a complete loss of diazepam binding, whereas the affinity for GABA was not altered (Korpi et al., 1993) Furthermore, tyrosine 93 in the alpha -subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, involved in acetylcholine binding, is equivalent to histidine 101 of the GABAAR alpha 1 subunit. Although benzodiazepines are allosteric modulators rather than agonists or antagonists of the GABAARs, it is interesting to speculate that this binding domain of GABAARs may be equivalent to one for GlyR competitive antagonists. Notably, quinolinic acid compounds behave differently from the other GlyR antagonists. The IC50 value of 5,7ClQA was similar for both mutant and wt GlyRs. 5,7ClQA has been described previously as a mixed competitive/noncompetitive antagonist (Schmieden et al., 1996). Neither the competitive binding nor the allosteric interaction of 5,7ClQA were found to be affected by the mutations analyzed in this study (V.S., unpublished data). Consequently, a separate subsite for quinolines may exist.

The maximal current responses elicited by taurine and beta -ABA were significantly higher with the mutant receptors (70-90% of the maximal glycine response) than with the wt alpha 1 GlyR (30 and 7%, respectively). In contrast, beta -AIBA appeared similarly effective at both the mutants and the wt alpha 1 subunit. To examine whether this change in ligand efficacy reflected differences in agonist affinity, we compared the EC50 values obtained for taurine, beta -ABA, and beta -AIBA to the respective maximal current responses and found no correlation. This may reflect a nonequivalence of measured EC50 value and true binding affinities. For recombinant GlyRs, glycine affinities determined by displacement of bound [3H]strychnine and EC50 values calculated from dose-effect curves have been found to be similar (Rajendra et al., 1995). We therefore conclude that the low efficacy of beta -amino acids must be due to other properties of these ligands.

In an previous report we speculated that the low gating efficacy of partial agonists originates from their simultaneous agonistic and antagonistic binding within the pharmacophore of the GlyR (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). This assumption is based on the fact that beta -amino acids can exist in different conformations. The trans configuration is structurally related to nipecotic acid, which is a full antagonist, whereas the cis configuration has been proposed to represent the agonistic conformation (Schmieden and Betz, 1995). Accepting these predictions and assuming that the binding site of the GlyR can be occupied by both the trans- and cis-conformers, a simple competitive interaction may occur between the latter. Here, we examined this proposal by fitting the current responses of partial agonists with the logistic function 3, which considers the respective affinities of both conformers. Based on visual inspection of the resulting fits it can be concluded that this procedure results in a good description of the observed current responses. Accordingly, the efficacy (Irel) of the respective ligand is proportional to its Ka/Kb ratio. It is worth noting that the Kb, but not the Ka, value depends critically on the mole fractions of agonistic and antagonistic conformers (F) within the agonist solution. Here, we assumed the mole fraction ratio to be 1, because this value is close to the mole ratios obtained for beta -alanine and taurine in NMR studies (Ham, 1974). As shown in Fig. 5, this resulted in excellent fits of the predicted and our experimentally determined relative current values.

According to the proposal made above, the high current responses of taurine and beta -ABA found at our mutants reflect an increase in agonistic binding (low Ka value) with a simultaneous loss of GlyR antagonism (high Kb value). Indeed, our competition experiments clearly show that both ligands failed to inhibit glycine-evoked currents. In contrast, beta -AIBA was still capable of antagonizing glycine responses at mutant K104A. Although the determined EC50 and IC50 values for this ligand changed (both about 2.5-fold), the calculated Ka/Kb ratios and the evoked current responses appeared similar for both the mutants and the wt alpha 1 GlyR.

Our model also gives a reasonable explanation for the differences in Hill coefficients reported between full and partial agonists. When using a uniform cooperativity for all agonists of about h = 2.5, our model calculations generated dose-response curves for taurine and beta -ABA with a slope <2. Similar results were observed in experiments with adrenergic alpha 2 autoreceptors (Feuerstein et al., 1994) and the alpha 1 GlyR (Schmieden and Betz, 1995), in which partial agonist function was mimicked by applying mixtures of a full agonist and an antagonist at various concentration ratios.

Allosterical two-state receptor models (Monod et al., 1965; Leff, 1995) have also been used to explain partial agonist activity. In these models, ligands are thought to bind to active (R) or inactive (R') receptor conformations with corresponding Ka and Kb values. The affinities of a particular ligand for R' and/or R then define its full agonistic, partial agonistic, or antagonistic activities, respectively. Consequently, receptors in which the R:R' ratios were changed ("L-phenotype" according to Galzi et al., 1996) may yield different gating efficiencies. Using this approach, the low glycine responses of GlyR alpha 1 mutants causing hyperekplexia (Rajendra et al., 1994; Langosch et al., 1994) have been explained theoretically (Galzi et al., 1996). However, these models consistently correlated low current responses with low affinities for agonists. Assuming that our mutations solely changed the allosteric R/R' ratio of the resulting GlyRs by favoring a high open probability as required for increased current responses, the resulting EC50 values should be significantly lower than for the wt GlyR. This prediction contradicts our findings. We therefore conclude that the amino acid exchanges at positions 104, 108, and 112 had no major effect on allosteric transitions. Rather, these amino acids appear crucial for the recognition of antagonists and the trans-conformation of beta -amino acids. All presently available data are compatible with the interpretation that the altered gating efficiencies of partial agonists seen upon substitution of residues 104, 108, and 112 reflect a loss of self-inhibition resulting from an increased Ka/Kb ratio.

    Footnotes

Received March 8, 1999; Accepted June 16, 1999

1 Present address: Department of Physiology, Campus Charité, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Tucholskystrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany. Phone: +49(30)28026183, Fax +49(30)28026669, e-mail: volker.schmieden{at}charite.de

2 Present address: Department of Anatomy and Cellular Neurobiology, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081 Ulm, Federal Republic of Germany.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Volker Schmieden, Department of Physiology, Campus Charité, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Tucholskystrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: volker.schmieden{at}charite.de

    Abbreviations

beta -ABA, beta -aminobutyric acid; GABA, gamma -aminobutyric acid; beta -AIBA, beta -aminoisobutyric acid; GABAAR, type A gamma -aminobutyric acid receptor; GlyR, inhibitory glycine receptor; wt, wild-type; 5,7ClQA, 5,7-dichloro-4-hydroxy-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid.

    References
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0026-895X/99/030464-09$3.00/0
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 56:464-472 (1999).
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. Gameiro, F. Reimann, A. M. Habib, D. O'Malley, L. Williams, A. K. Simpson, and F. M. Gribble
The neurotransmitters glycine and GABA stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 release from the GLUTag cell line
J. Physiol., December 15, 2005; 569(3): 761 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. S Miller, M. Beato, R. J Harvey, and T. G Smart
Molecular determinants of glycine receptor {alpha}{beta} subunit sensitivities to Zn2+-mediated inhibition
J. Physiol., August 1, 2005; 566(3): 657 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. B.P. van Kuilenburg, R. Meinsma, E. Beke, B. Assmann, A. Ribes, I. Lorente, R. Busch, E. Mayatepek, N. G.G.M. Abeling, A. van Cruchten, et al.
{beta}-Ureidopropionase deficiency: an inborn error of pyrimidine degradation associated with neurological abnormalities
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2004; 13(22): 2793 - 2801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. W. Lynch
Molecular Structure and Function of the Glycine Receptor Chloride Channel
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1051 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Castaldo, P. Stefanoni, F. Miceli, G. Coppola, E. M. del Giudice, G. Bellini, A. Pascotto, J. R. Trudell, N. L. Harrison, L. Annunziato, et al.
A Novel Hyperekplexia-causing Mutation in the Pre-transmembrane Segment 1 of the Human Glycine Receptor {alpha}1 Subunit Reduces Membrane Expression and Impairs Gating by Agonists
J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25598 - 25604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Chen, G. H. Dillon, and R. Huang
Molecular Determinants of Proton Modulation of Glycine Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 876 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Thio, A. Shanmugam, K. Isenberg, and K. Yamada
Benzodiazepines Block {alpha}2-Containing Inhibitory Glycine Receptors in Embryonic Mouse Hippocampal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow