|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 2, 419-428, August 1999
Institut für Biochemie und Molekulare Zellbiologie (F.N.-R., U.M., U.B., G.P.P.); and Abteilung Immunologie (M.O.), Göttingen, Germany
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostaglandin E2 receptors (EP-Rs) belong to the
family of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled ectoreceptors with seven
transmembrane domains. They can be subdivided into four subtypes
according to their ligand-binding and G protein-coupling specificity:
EP1 couple to Gq, EP2 and EP4 to Gs, and EP3 to
Gi. The EP4-R, in contrast to the EP3
-R, shows rapid
agonist-induced desensitization. The agonist-induced desensitization
depends on the presence of the EP4-R carboxyl-terminal domain, which
also confers desensitization in a Gi-coupled rEP3hEP4
carboxyl-terminal domain receptor hybrid (rEP3hEP4-Ct-R). To elucidate
the possible mechanism of this desensitization, in vivo phosphorylation
stimulated by activators of second messenger kinases, by prostaglandin
E2, or by the EP3-R agonist M&B28767 was investigated in
COS-7 cells expressing FLAG-epitope-tagged rat EP3
-R (rEP3
-R),
hEP4-R, or rEP3hEP4-Ct-R. Stimulation of protein kinase C with
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate led to a slight phosphorylation
of the FLAG-rEP3
-R but to a strong phosphorylation of the
FLAG-hEP4-R and the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, which was suppressed by the
protein kinase A and protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine. Prostaglandin E2 stimulated phosphorylation of the
FLAG-hEP4-R in its carboxyl-terminal receptor domain. The EP3-R agonist
M&B28767 induced a time- and dose-dependent phosphorylation of the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R but not of the FLAG-rEP3
-R. Agonist-induced
phosphorylation of the FLAG-hEP4-R and the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R were not
inhibited by staurosporine, which implies a role of G protein-coupled
receptor kinases (GRKs) in agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation.
Overexpression of GRKs in FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R-expressing COS-7 cells
augmented the M&B28767-induced receptor phosphorylation and receptor
sequestration. These findings indicate that phosphorylation of the
carboxyl-terminal hEP4-R domain possibly by GRKs but not by second
messenger kinases may be involved in rapid agonist-induced
desensitization of the hEP4-R and the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostaglandin
E2 receptors (EP-Rs), like most prostanoid
receptors, belong to the class of G protein-coupled ectoreceptors (GPCR) with seven transmembrane domains (Negishi, 1994
). There are four
subtypes of E-prostaglandin receptors (EP-Rs) that differ in their
affinity to synthetic ligands and their G protein coupling specificity.
EP1-Rs are linked to Gq and increase inositol
trisphosphate (InsP3) and, hence, cytosolic
Ca2+ concentration. EP2-Rs and EP4-Rs are coupled
to Gs and increase intracellular cAMP. EP3-Rs are
coupled to Gi and decrease hormone-stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation (Fig. 1)
(Coleman, 1994
). These receptors display an overall sequence homology
of about 50%; the putative transmembrane domains are the most
conserved (Coleman, 1994
). Analysis of naturally occurring
variants (Negishi, 1993a
,b
; Hasegawa, 1996
), of receptor hybrids
between different prostanoid receptors (Dorn, 1997
; Kobayashi, 1997
;
Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
,b
), and of receptors in which single amino
acids or groups of amino acids have been replaced or removed (Funk,
1993
; Irie, 1994
; Audoly and Breyer, 1997
; Bastepe and Ashby, 1997
;
Chang, 1997
) provided insight into the structure-function relationship
of prostanoid receptors. The transmembrane domains (Funk, 1993
; Chang,
1997
) and some parts of the extracellular loops (Audoly and Breyer, 1997
; Dorn, 1997
) of the prostanoid receptors seem to be responsible for ligand binding and binding specificity, the carboxyl-terminal domains have been implicated in control of signal transduction (Irie,
1994
), G protein-coupling specificity (Negishi, 1993a
), and
agonist-induced receptor desensitization (Negishi, 1993b
; Nishigaki,
1996
). Splice variants of the mouse or the bovine EP3-Rs that differ
only in their carboxyl-terminal portions couple to different G proteins
(Negishi, 1993a
). Truncation of the murine EP3-R carboxyl-terminal
domain leads to constitutive activation (Irie, 1994
). Only one of the
mouse EP3-R carboxyl-terminal splice variants, the EP3
-R, showed
agonist-dependent desensitization (Negishi, 1993b
). Similarly, of the
two Gs-linked EP-Rs (EP2-R and EP4-R), only the
EP4-R, which has a long serine- and threonine-rich carboxyl-terminal
domain, shows rapid agonist-induced desensitization (Nishigaki, 1996
).
Agonist-induced desensitization but not G protein coupling was lost by
truncation of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the human EP4-R (Bastepe
and Ashby, 1997
).
|
In a previous study, to elucidate the role of the EP-R
carboxyl-terminal domain in G protein coupling and agonist-induced receptor desensitization, a receptor hybrid was generated consisting of
the amino-terminal main portion of the
Gi-coupled, nondesensitizable rat EP3
-R
(rEP3
-R) up to the end of the seventh transmembrane domain and the
carboxyl-terminal portion of the Gs-coupled,
desensitizable human EP4-R (hEP4-R) (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
,b
).
This receptor hybrid retained the binding specificity of the EP3-R
(i.e., it bound the EP3-R-specific agonist M&B28767 with higher
affinity than prostaglandin (PG) E2
(PGE2). When stably expressed in HepG2 cells, the
hybrid receptor exclusively coupled to Gi
(Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
). The carboxyl-terminal domain of the
EP4-R in the receptor hybrid was necessary and sufficient to confer
agonist-induced receptor desensitization (Fig. 1)
(Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997b
). The molecular events responsible for
this effect are currently unknown. Rapid termination of signaling by
GPCRs is typically initiated by receptor phosphorylation events
catalyzed either by second messenger-activated kinases [such as
cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or
Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent protein kinase
(PKC)] or by GPCR kinases (GRK) (Lohse, 1993
; Premont, 1995
).
Currently, GRKs form a family of six such kinases (GRK1-6) that can
phosphorylate serine and/or threonine residues in the carboxyl-terminal
domains of ligand-occupied GPCRs (Premont, 1995
).
To test the hypothesis that GRK-mediated phosphorylation of the hEP4-R
carboxyl-terminal domain is responsible for receptor desensitization,
hEP4-R (which may activate PKA), rEP3
-R, and the chimeric
rEP3hEP4-Ct-R (Ct indicates the carboxyl-terminal domain), which do not
activate second messenger-dependent kinases, were tagged with a
FLAG-epitope and expressed in COS-7 cells. Receptor
phosphorylation and sequestration promoted by specific agonists or
second messenger kinase activators, such as
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or forskolin, were then investigated.
The FLAG-hEP4-R and the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R but not the FLAG-rEP3
-R
were phosphorylated by agonist stimulation. The FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R phosphorylation was augmented by GRK overexpression. In addition, GRK
overexpression enhanced agonist-induced FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R sequestration. These results indicate that GRK-mediated phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the hEP4-R in the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R is possibly involved in the sequestration of this receptor.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. All materials were of analytical grade and from commercial sources. M&B28767 was a generous gift from Rhone-Poulenc Rorer (Dagenham, United Kingdom). [3H]PGE2 was obtained from Amersham (Braunschweig, Germany); unlabeled PGE2, forskolin, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), and PMA were purchased from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (Bad Soden, Germany). Cell culture media were obtained from Gibco-BRL (Eggenstein, Germany) and 32Pi from ICN (Meckenheim, Germany). Primers (Table 1) were synthesized by NAPS (Göttingen, Germany). Sepharose Cl-4B, protein-G Sepharose FF, glutathione agarose, and BrCN-activated Sepharose were purchased from Pharmacia (Freiburg, Germany). Trypsin (10,800 U/mg) and monoclonal antibody (mAb) factor FLAG-M2 were from Sigma Chemical Co. (Heidelberg, Germany). The sources of other materials are given in the text.
|
FLAG-Epitope Tagging of the rEP3
-R, hEP4-R, and Chimeric
rEP3hEP4-Ct-R.
Cloning of the rEP3
-R (Neuschäfer-Rube,
1994
) and hEP4-R (Blaschke, 1996
) cDNAs was carried out as described
previously. The cDNA for the chimeric rEP3hEP4-Ct-R was constructed by
recombinant polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology. The protocol
for the construction of the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R cDNA has been described in
detail elsewhere (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
). A FLAG-octapeptide
sequence (N-Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys-C) recognized by the mAb
FLAG-M2 was inserted after the initiator methionine of the rEP3
-R,
hEP4-R, and the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R by PCR using Silver Star
Taq-polymerase (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium). The forward
primers were FLAG-EP4 for the hEP4-R cDNA and FLAG-EP3 for the two
other cDNAs (Table 1) The reverse primers were P2 for the rEP3
-R, P3
for the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, and P4 for the hEP4-R (Table 1). All PCRs were
performed with 10-ng template (pcDNAI/rEP3
-R, pcDNAI/rEP3hEP4-Ct-R,
and pcDNA/AMP hEP4-R) and 35 cycles of the following temperature
profile: 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 2 min at 72°C. The
resultant cDNA fragments for the FLAG-rEP3
-R and the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R were cloned with the T/A cloning method into
PUC57/T (MBI-Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) and verified by DNA
sequencing. The 1100-base-pair (bp) NotI/XbaI
FLAG-rEP3
-R fragment and the 1600-bp NotI
FLAG-rEP3hEP-Ct-R fragment were further subcloned in the eukaryotic
expression vector pcDNAI (Invitrogen, de Schelp, The Netherlands). The
cDNA fragment for the FLAG-hEP4-R was cleaved with HindIII
and XbaI and cloned into pcDNAI/AMP.
Cell Culture and Transfection.
COS-7 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal
calf serum (FCS) and penicillin (100 units/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) as antibiotics. COS-7 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/10-cm-diameter plate and transiently
transfected after 24 h using the DEAE-dextran method (Levesque,
1991
) with pcDNAI/FLAG-rRP3
-R, pcDNA/AMP/FLAG-hEP4-R, or
pcDNAI/FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R (5 µg/plate) alone or together with pcDNAI
or pcDNAI expression vectors for GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, or GRK6 (5 µg/plate) (Oppermann, 1996a
). Twelve hours after transfection, cells
were split into 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and assays were performed 72 h after transfection.
Membrane Isolation and PGE2 Binding Assay.
For
membrane preparations, transfected cells were scraped into a
homogenization buffer containing 25 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5) 250 mM
sucrose, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA and 0.2 mM
Pefabloc SC (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany), 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin-inhibitor as protease inhibitors. After
homogenization of the cells in a Dounce homogenizer, a crude membrane
fraction was prepared by centrifugation of the homogenate at
100,000g. The resulting pellet was suspended in binding
buffer containing 25 mM 4-morpholine-ethanesulfonic acid/NaOH (MES/OH)
(pH 6.2), 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EDTA and stored
at
70°C. For PGE2 binding, membranes (20-50
µg of protein) were incubated with 5 nM
[3H]PGE2 in 100 µl of
binding buffer for 1 h at 20°C. Nonspecific binding was
determined in the presence of 25 µM PGE2. Bound
and unbound ligands were separated by rapid vacuum filtration through GF 52 filters (Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel, Germany). Filters were washed five times with 4 ml of ice-cold binding buffer.
Radioactivity retained on the filter was counted in 5 ml of Hydroluma
(Baker, Deventer, Netherlands). Binding constants were calculated by
nonlinear regression analysis (LIGAND; Rovati, 1988
).
Generation of a glutathione S-transferase
(GST)/hEP4-R-Ct Fusion Protein.
A cDNA fragment
encoding the carboxyl-terminal domain of the hEP4-R from the end of the
seventh transmembrane domain was amplified by PCR using Silver Star
Taq-polymerase. The forward primer was EP4-Ct F (Table 1)
and the reverse primer was P3. PCR was performed with 10-ng template
(pcDNA/AMP/FLAG-hEP4-R) and 35 cycles of the following temperature
profile: 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 2 min at 72°C. The
resultant 521-bp cDNA fragment was cloned blunt-end into PUC18
(Pharmacia) and sequenced. The cDNA fragment was further subcloned into
the BamHI/EcoRI site of the prokaryotic
expression vector pGEX-5X-3 (Pharmacia) to fuse the hEP4-R
carboxyl-terminal domain to the carboxyl terminus of the
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible GST that was encoded by the vector. Escherichia coli strain BL-21 was transformed with this fusion-plasmid.
Synthesis of the fusion protein was induced by 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 5 h. The fusion protein was enriched from crude cell extracts by
glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography according to the manufacturer's instructions and purified to apparent homogeneity by
preparative SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using the
PrepCell 491 (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). The purified
GST-hEP4-R-Ct fusion protein was concentrated using
centricon 10 (Amicon, Beverly, MA), dialyzed against PBS, and used as
antigen to raise polyclonal antibodies in rabbits.
Purification of Polyclonal Anti-hEP4-R-Ct IgG. Four weeks after the last immunization, the rabbit was bled. IgG was purified on protein G Sepharose FF-beads. IgGs were eluted with 50 mM glycine/HCl (pH 2.7) neutralized and dialyzed against PBS. Antibodies against GST were absorbed on GST-Sepharose, which was prepared by coupling recombinant GST to BrCN-activated Sepharose (10 mg of GST/ml of Sepharose).
Western Blotting. Membrane proteins (20-50 µg) of transfected or control cells were solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing or nonreducing conditions for 60 min at 37°C and 10 min at 60°C with vigorous shaking, separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by semidry blotting. The PVDF membrane was first blocked in 5% (w/v) skim milk in PBS, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (PBS-T), and FLAG-tagged receptor proteins were detected by treating immunoblots overnight with 0.3 µg/ml mAb FLAG-M2 in 1% (w/v) skim milk in PBS-T at 4°C followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse IgG (1:20,000 dilution; Bio-Rad). FLAG-hEP4-R was also detected by overnight incubation with 0.5 µg/ml rabbit anti-hEP4-R-Ct IgG in 1% (w/v) skim milk in PBS-T at 4°C followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution; Amersham) for 60 min at room temperature. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham) according to the instructions of the company.
Intact Cell Phosphorylation. Transfected COS-7 cells in 6-well plates were washed two times with phosphate-free DMEM and prelabeled for 60 min with 150 µCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate in 500 µl of the same medium containing 10% (v/v) FCS that had been dialyzed extensively against 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM sodium chloride. After cell-labeling, various agents, in a volume of 500 µl in phosphate-free, 10% (v/v) dialyzed FCS containing DMEM, were added for 10 min at 37°C unless otherwise indicated. Where indicated, cells were treated with 400 nM staurosporine 20 min before stimulation. After stimulation, the medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS before immunoprecipitation.
Tryptic Receptor Cleavage in Intact Cells. Intact naive or PGE2-stimulated cells expressing FLAG-hEP4-R were treated for 5 min at 37°C with 400 µl of 0.25% (w/v) trypsin in PBS to cleave trypsin cleavage sites in the extracellular domains. Digestion was stopped by the addition of 400 µl of FCS. Cells were transferred to microfuge tubes and collected by centrifugation (5 min at 160g) to remove tryptic activity before receptor solubilization.
Immunoprecipitation.
For immunoprecipitation, cells
expressing FLAG-rEP3
-R or the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R were scraped into
lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium fluoride and
10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, with 0.2 mM Pefabloc SC), 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin-inhibitor as protease
inhibitors, transferred to microfuge tubes, and lysed by vigorous
vortexing. Membranes were collected by centrifugation (10 min at
14,000g) and solubilized in 40 µl of lysis buffer
containing 1% (w/v) SDS for 15 min at 65°C. After chilling to 4°C,
760 µl of concentrated detergent/salt solution was added to yield a
final concentration of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.05% (w/v) SDS and 150 mM sodium chloride in lysis buffer (IP buffer). Cells expressing
FLAG-hEP4-R were directly scraped in 800 µl of IP buffer and lysed by
vigorous vortexing. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation
(30 min at 20,000g), and the supernatant was precleared with
100 µl of 10% (v/v) Sepharose 4B in IP buffer containing 0.1% (w/v)
bovine serum albumin for 60 min at 4°C. The precleared supernatant
was incubated for 2 h at 4°C with an immune complex of 15 µg
of mAb FLAG-M2 or anti-hEP4-R-Ct IgG and 100 µl of 10%
(v/v) protein-G Sepharose FF in IP buffer containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine
serum albumin, which was preformed by incubation for 60 min at 4°C.
Immune complexes were collected by centrifugation and washed five times
with ice-cold IP buffer. Samples were suspended in Laemmli sample
buffer and prepared for SDS-PAGE as outlined above.
Sequestration Assay. For receptor sequestration studies, transfected cells were washed three times with 5 ml of HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 140 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 11 mM glucose, and 15 mM HEPES (incubation buffer) and then preincubated for 10 min in the same buffer with or without 100 nM M&B28767. The agonist was removed by two washes with incubation buffer, an acid wash with 3 ml of 50 mM glycine and 150 mM NaCl (pH 3) for 1 min, and an additional two washes with incubation buffer. Cells were then detached from the tissue culture plates with 250 µl of ice-cold Ca2+-free incubation buffer containing 1 mM EDTA. Of this cell suspension, 50 µl were incubated in a total volume of 100 µl with 5 nM [3H]PGE2 for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped and cell-bound radioactivity was measured as outlined above in Membrane Isolation and PGE2 Binding Assay.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of FLAG-rEP3
-R, FLAG-hEP4-R, and FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
in COS-7 cells.
COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with the
cDNAs for the FLAG-rEP3
-R, FLAG-hEP4-R, and FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
cloned in the eukaryotic expression vectors pcDNAI or pcDNA/AMP.
Competition binding studies with membrane preparations of transfected
cells showed that all receptors had a similar affinity for
PGE2 (FLAG-rEP3
-R, Kd = 11 ± 1 nM; FLAG-hEP4-R,
Kd = 5.9 ± 3 nM; FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, Kd = 12 ± 4 nM; not shown). The
Kd values were in the same range as those
of the untagged wild-type receptors (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1994
,
1997a
), which indicates that the amino-terminal FLAG-tag did not alter
the receptor binding properties. FLAG-rEP3
-R and FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
were expressed to a comparable very high level (FLAG-rEP3
-R,
Bmax = 7.2 ± 0.3 pmol/mg of protein;
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, Bmax = 5 ± 1 pmol/mg of protein) whereas FLAG-hEP4-R expression was somewhat lower
(Bmax 0.9 ± 0.2 pmol/mg of protein).
-R appeared as four distinct bands
with molecular masses of 80 kDa, 43 kDa, 41 kDa, and 39 kDa (Fig.
2A). No staining was observed in
membranes of untransfected control cells. The molecular weight of the
rEP3
-R protein predicted from the cDNA is 39.6 kDa. It contains two
potential N-linked glycosylation sites located in the
amino-terminal domain and the second extracellular loop. The 43-kDa,
41-kDa, and 39-kDa band may represent di-, mono-, and nonglycosylated
forms of the receptor. This is supported by the observation that after
receptor treatment with N-glycosidase F, only the 39-kDa
band was visible (Böer, 1998
-R. The
30-kDa band was supposed to represent an amino-terminal receptor fragment; this protein was only detected with the FLAG-M2 antibody but
not with the anti-hEP4-R-Ct IgG (Fig. 2B).
|
-R and FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R under
nonreducing conditions differed from electrophoresis under reducing
conditions. Both receptors migrated as broad complexes with apparent
molecular masses ranging from 100 to 150 kDa, which was not observed in
nontransfected COS-7 cells and may represent receptor aggregates (Fig.
2A). By contrast, there was no difference in the migration profile of
the FLAG-hEP4-R under reducing- or nonreducing conditions. Identical
results for all three receptors were obtained by immunoprecipitation
followed by detection of receptor proteins with a biotinylated FLAG-M2
antibody and peroxidase conjugated avidin (not shown). In most
experiments, the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R was difficult to detect after
immunoprecipitation and separation under reducing conditions because it
comigrated with the heavy-chain of the FLAG-M2 antibody, which masked
the receptor protein during detection. Therefore, immunocomplexes with
the FLAG-M2 antibody were routinely resolved under nonreducing
conditions after in vivo phosphorylation and receptor immunoprecipitation.
Agonist-Induced Phosphorylation of the FLAG-hEP4-R and the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R.
To study agonist-induced phosphorylation of
the FLAG-rEP3
-R, FLAG-hEP4-R, and FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, COS-7 cells
expressing FLAG-tagged receptors were labeled with
32Pi and stimulated either
with the EP3-R agonist M&B28767 (100 nM; FLAG-rEP3
-R and
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R) or PGE2 (1 µM; FLAG-hEP4-R) for 10 min. A phosphoprotein was immunoprecipitated with the FLAG-M2 antibody from solubilized proteins of cells transfected with the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R (Fig. 3C) and
FLAG-hEP4-R (Fig. 3E). These proteins comigrated with the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and the FLAG-hEP4-R detected by Western blotting.
Phosphorylation of the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and the FLAG-hEP4-R were
significantly enhanced upon agonist-stimulation (i.e., after
pretreatment with M&B28767 or PGE2). In contrast, no phosphoprotein was immunoprecipitated from cells transfected with
FLAG-rEP3
-R either with or without agonist-stimulation (Fig. 3A).
|
|
|
|
Inhibition by Staurosporine of Second Messenger Kinase but Not
Agonist-Induced Phosphorylation of the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and
FLAG-hEP4-R.
To investigate which kinases effect agonist-induced
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and FLAG-hEP4-R phosphorylation or are capable of
phosphorylating the FLAG-rEP3
-R, cells were treated with agonist or
with both specific activators and inhibitors of the second
messenger-dependent kinases PKC or PKA. Forskolin, an activator that
increases intracellular cAMP concentration and activates PKA, had no
significant effect on either FLAG-rEP3
-R, FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, or
FLAG-hEP4-R phosphorylation (Fig. 3, A, C, and E). In contrast, the
phorbol ester PMA, a potent PKC activator, led to a slight increase in
FLAG-rEP3
-R phosphorylation (Fig. 3A) and induced a strong
phosphorylation of the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and the FLAG-hEP4-R (Fig. 3,
C and E). PMA induced FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and FLAG-hEP4-R
phosphorylation to a comparable extent as the agonists M&B28767 and
PGE2.
-R, FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R, and
FLAG-hEP4-R phosphorylation and decreased basal receptor
phosphorylation (Fig. 3, B, D, and F). In contrast, staurosporine had
no effect on M&B28767- or PGE2-induced
phosphorylation, which indicates that neither PKC nor PKA are involved
in agonist-induced FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and FLAG-hEP4-R phosphorylation
(Fig. 3, D and F).
Enhanced Agonist-Promoted Phosphorylation of the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
by GRK Overexpression.
As second messenger-activated kinases
seemed not to be involved in agonist-induced FLAG-hEP4-R and
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R phosphorylation, it was assumed that the activated
receptor serves as a substrate for GRK. To test this hypothesis, GRKs
2, 3, 5, and 6 were co-overexpressed with the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R and
agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation was determined.
Western-blotting with antibodies specific for GRKs 2 or 3, or GRKs 5 or
6 (Oppermann, 1996a
) revealed that COS-7 cells contained little
intrinsic GRKs and that all GRKs were over-expressed to a comparably
high level (not shown). GRK over-expression did not influence maximal
[3H]PGE2 binding by the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R (not shown). Overexpression of GRKs 2, 3, and 5 augmented basal and agonist-stimulated FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R phosphorylation by about 2-fold, whereas the ratio between basal and
agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation remained constant (Fig.
7). GRK 6 was less effective. There was no significant
difference in the capacity of GRKs 2, 3, and 5 to phosphorylate the
receptor. These results show that under the conditions used in this
cellular assay, the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R seemed susceptible to
agonist-promoted phosphorylation mediated by GRKs.
|
Enhanced Sequestration of the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R by GRK
Overexpression.
To correlate GRK-mediated FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
phosphorylation with agonist-induced desensitization of the receptor
previously observed in HepG2/rEP3hEP4-Ct-R cells
(Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997b
), GRK2 was coexpressed with the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R or the nondesensitizable FLAG-EP3
-R as an
internal control and sequestration of receptors as a response to
agonist-exposure was examined. Receptor sequestration was measured as a
loss of [3H]PGE2 binding
sites on the plasma membrane of transfected COS-7 cells after a 10-min
preincubation period with 100 nM M&B28767. In cells transfected with
the FLAG-rEP3
-R, agonist exposure did not cause significant receptor
sequestration either in the absence or in the presence of overexpressed
GRK2 (Fig. 8). In contrast, preincubation of
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R-expressing cells with the agonist M&B28767
significantly decreased the number of
[3H]PGE2 binding sites on
the cell surface by about 15%. This agonist-induced receptor
sequestration was augmented to about 30% when GRK2 was co-overexpressed with the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R (Fig.
8). These results indicate that there may be a
direct link between GRK-mediated phosphorylation and sequestration of
the FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R induced by the EP3-R agonist M&B28767.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The biological effects elicited by prostanoid receptors, like
those of many other GPCRs, are regulated by an attenuation of their
intracellular signal transduction in response to short- or long-term
ligand exposure (Nordstedt, 1988
; Sakai, 1996
). Recent studies showed
that the carboxyl-terminal domain of prostanoid receptors plays an
important role in this desensitization process. Variation of the EP3-R
carboxyl-terminal domain created by alternative splicing resulted in
different rapid agonist-induced receptor desensitization (Negishi,
1993b
). The role of the carboxyl-terminal domain in desensitization is
also underscored by the recent finding of a loss of desensitization in
a carboxyl-terminally truncated EP4-R (Bastepe and Ashby, 1997
). As
previously shown, the carboxyl-terminal domain of the EP4-R is not only
necessary but also sufficient to confer rapid agonist-induced
desensitization in a hybrid receptor with the nondesensitizable
rEP3
-R (Fig. 1) (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
). By contrast, the
third intracellular loop of the EP4-R was neither necessary nor
sufficient to mediate agonist-induced desensitization
(Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997a
).
Desensitization by Phosphorylation.
Agonist-induced receptor
desensitization of GPCRs may be mediated by receptor phosphorylation.
Several lines of evidence support this postulated link between
agonist-stimulated desensitization and phosphorylation also for the
hEP4-R and the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R. First, PGE2 induced
both the desensitization of the hEP4-R (Bastepe, 1997
) and
phosphorylation of the FLAG-hEP4-R expressed in COS-7 cells (Fig. 3E).
The EP3-R agonist M&B28767 did not induce desensitization of the
rEP3
-R, stably expressed in HepG2 cells (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997b
), and was also inefficient in the induction of FLAG-rEP3
-R phosphorylation (Fig. 3A). By contrast, the agonist stimulated both the
desensitization of the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R in HepG2 cells
(Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997b
) and phosphorylation of the
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R transiently expressed in COS-7 cells (Fig. 3C).
Second, the time course of the M&B28767-induced FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
phosphorylation (Fig. 5) fit well with the kinetics of agonist-induced
rEP3hEP4-Ct-R desensitization, measured as a reduced inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (Neuschäfer-Rube, 1997b
).
Both effects were rapid, with an onset after 1 min and a maximum at 10 to 30 min.
3/
2-adrenergic receptor desensitization and phosphorylation after
exposure to agonist was induced by the
2-adrenergic receptor carboxyl-terminal domain (Liggett, 1993Phosphorylation Sites.
Because the only structural difference
between the rEP3
-R and the rEP3hEP4-Ct-R is the carboxyl-terminal
domain, agonist-induced phosphorylation in the latter receptor most
likely occurred in the hEP4-R carboxyl-terminal domain. This assumption
was supported by the finding that a tryptic fragment of the hEP4-R,
which had an apparent molecular weight that corresponded to the
predicted molecular mass of a tryptic fragment ranging from the third
extracellular loop to the end of the carboxyl-terminal domain, was
phosphorylated by PGE2-stimulation (Fig. 6).
However, additional phosphorylation, which depends on the presence of
the hEP4-R carboxyl-terminal domain, of other parts of the receptor
(i.e., Ser or Thr residues in the first, second, or third intracellular
loops), cannot be ruled out. rEP3
-R and hEP4-R carboxyl-terminal
domains contain different numbers of target sequences for protein
kinases. The rEP3
-R carboxyl-terminal domain contains only five
serines, two of which are potential PKC-phosphorylation sites
[consensus sequence S/TXR (Pearson and Kemp, 1991
)] and no threonine.
By contrast, the carboxyl-terminal domain of the hEP4-R contains 27 serine and 10 threonine residues, five of which are potential
PKC-phosphorylation sites and nine of which might be defined as
potential phosphorylation sites for GRKs; however, GRKs have no strict
recognition sequence, but they seem to prefer Ser or Thr that are
preceded by an Asp or Glu at a distance of three amino acids
(Onorato, 1991
; Fig. 1).
Phosphorylation by GRKs.
Agonist-dependent receptor
phosphorylation could be mediated either through second
messenger-dependent kinases or GRKs. There are examples for both
mechanisms. The human prostacyclin receptor, which increases
cAMP-formation at low iloprost concentrations and
InsP3-formation at high iloprost concentrations,
was phosphorylated and desensitized by high iloprost concentrations
only (Smyth, 1996
). Phosphorylation and desensitization were inhibited
by staurosporine, which implies a PKC-dependent mechanism. Conversely,
GRK-dependent phosphorylation of Ser and Thr residues in the
carboxyl-terminal domain has been shown to mediate receptor
desensitization of the
1-adrenergic receptor (Freedman, 1995
), the
endothelin receptor (Freedman, 1997
), the
-opioid receptor (Pei,
1995
), the thrombin receptor (Ishii, 1994
), the type-1A angiotensin II
receptor (Oppermann, 1996b
), and the adenosine A3 receptor (Palmer,
1995
), to name but a few. Several lines of evidence support the
involvement of GRKs in agonist-stimulated hEP4-R and rEP3hEP4-Ct-R
phosphorylation and desensitization:
-R, FLAG-hEP4-R, or FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R phosphorylation. On
the other hand, activation of PKC by a high dose (2 mM) of the phorbol
ester PMA led to a slight (FLAG-rEP3
-R) or massive (FLAG-hEP4-R and
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R) receptor phosphorylation (Fig. 3). The
PMA-dependent receptor phosphorylations were suppressed by the
PKC-inhibitor staurosporine, which, however, had no effect on the
agonist-induced phosphorylation. Thus, in contrast to the regulation of
the human prostacyclin receptor, PKC was apparently not involved
in PGE2- or M&B28767-stimulated phosphorylation
and desensitization of the FLAG-hEP4-R or FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R.
Third, overexpression of GRKs 2, 3, and 5 augmented agonist-induced
FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R phosphorylation, which implies the central role of
GRKs in FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R regulation. GRK2 overexpression also
increased agonist-induced FLAG-rEP3hEP4-Ct-R sequestration. This is in
line with recent findings for the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor
showing that GRK2 overexpression enhanced the sequestration of the
receptor at low concentrations of the agonist carbamylcholine (Tsuga,
1996, 1998| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Prof. Jungermann for his invaluable contributions in many discussions throughout the preparation of this manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 28, 1998; Accepted April 26, 1999
The work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Sonderforschungsbereich 402, Teilprojekt B6, and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. F. Neuschäfer-Rube, Institut für Biochemie und Molekulare Zellbiologie, Humboldtallee 23, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany. E-mail: fneusch{at}gwdg.de
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
EP-R, E-prostaglandin receptor; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; InsP3, inositol trisphosphate; r, rat; h, human; PG, prostaglandin; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; PKC, Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent protein kinase; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; PMA, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; PBS-T, PBS/Tween 20.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and EP4.
Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
357:
15.
-opioid receptor: Involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinases but not protein kinase C.
Mol Pharmacol
48:
173-177[Abstract].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Gobeil Jr, I. Dumont, A. M. Marrache, A. Vazquez-Tello, S. G. Bernier, D. Abran, X. Hou, M. H. Beauchamp, C. Quiniou, A. Bouayad, et al. Regulation of eNOS Expression in Brain Endothelial Cells by Perinuclear EP3 Receptors Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 682 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Wright, D. Abran, M. Bhattacharya, X. Hou, S. G. Bernier, A. Bouayad, J.-C. Fouron, A. Vazquez-Tello, M. H. Beauchamp, R. I. Clyman, et al. Prostanoid receptors: ontogeny and implications in vascular physiology Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1343 - R1360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Smyth, S. C. Austin, M. P. Reilly, and G. A. FitzGerald Internalization and Sequestration of the Human Prostacyclin Receptor J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2000; 275(41): 32037 - 32045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Penn, R. M. Pascual, Y.-M. Kim, S. J. Mundell, V. P. Krymskaya, R. A. Panettieri Jr., and J. L. Benovic Arrestin Specificity for G Protein-coupled Receptors in Human Airway Smooth Muscle J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 32648 - 32656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|